Soft Robotics: 3D Printable Synthetic Soft Muscle is 3X Stronger Than Natural Muscle

Share this Article

According to 3D printing guru Hod Lipson, who’s founded four companies, developed an innovative food 3D printer, co-authored two books and over 200 papers, and spoken at multiple industry events, robots will eventually be everywhere in our lives, thanks to new artificial intelligence algorithms and advanced manufacturing methods, like 3D printing. Lipson, a PhD who’s currently a professor of mechanical engineering at Columbia University Mechanical Engineering, has been working with a group of researchers in his Creative Machines Lab to develop a 3D printable synthetic soft muscle. Without the added help of external features, the self-contained soft actuator is three times stronger than natural muscle, which solves the issue in creating untethered soft robots that mimic natural biological systems in the way they move and act.

Until now, there hasn’t been a material that’s able to work as a soft muscle, because none have the desired high actuation stress and strain, and the soft actuator technologies that do exist are based on elastomer skins being pneumatically or hydraulically inflated through liquid or air; however, the necessary pressure-regulating equipment and external components have prevented researchers from creating independently moving, working robots.

Lipson said, “We’ve been making great strides toward making robots minds, but robot bodies are still primitive. This is a big piece of the puzzle and, like biology, the new actuator can be shaped and reshaped a thousand ways. We’ve overcome one of the final barriers to making lifelike robots.”

His research team developed a one-of-a-kind artificial active tissue that has an intrinsic expansion ability – without needing high voltage equipment or an external compressor like other artificial muscles. This new material is able to lift 1,000 times its own weight, and has a strain density, or expansion per gram, 15 times bigger than natural muscle. The researchers published their work in a study, titled “Soft material for soft actuators,” in the Nature Communications journal; in addition to Lipson, co-authors include Aslan Miriyev, a postdoctoral researcher in the Creative Machines Lab, and Kenneth Stack.

The artificial muscle in use as a bicep lifts a skeleton’s arm to a 90 degree position. [Image: Aslan Miriyev, Columbia Engineering]

According to the abstract, “Inspired by natural muscle, a key challenge in soft robotics is to develop self-contained electrically driven soft actuators with high strain density. Various characteristics of existing technologies, such as the high voltages required to trigger electroactive polymers ( > 1KV), low strain ( < 10%) of shape memory alloys and the need for external compressors and pressure-regulating components for hydraulic or pneumatic fluidicelastomer actuators, limit their practicality for untethered applications. Here we show a single self-contained soft robust composite material that combines the elastic properties of a polymeric matrix and the extreme volume change accompanying liquid–vapor transition. The material combines a high strain (up to 900%) and correspondingly high stress (up to 1.3 MPa) with low density (0.84 g cm−3). Along with its extremely low cost (about 3 cent per gram), simplicity of fabrication and environment-friendliness, these properties could enable new kinds of electrically driven entirely soft robots.”

Soft robotics are inspired by living organisms, and can replicate natural motion, like grasping, to pick up soft objects and perform other delicate tasks that rigid robots can’t handle. They have the potential to work well in fields where robots would often have to interact with humans, like healthcare and manufacturing.

L-R: The electrically actuated muscle with thin resistive wire in a rest position; the muscle is expanded using low power characteristics (8V). [Image: Aslan Miriyev, Columbia Engineering]

Miriyev, the lead author of the study, needed to find a way to replicate the extreme volume change and elastic properties of other materials systems – without costing the team too much money. So he used a silicone rubber matrix, with ethanol distributed through micro-bubbles, to make an actuator that combined low density with high strain and stress – not only did this keep costs down, it was easy to make, and used only environmentally safe materials.

(f) The sleigh robot and its locomotion powered at 8 W (8 V, 1 A). (g) Tetrahedral robot evolved and 3D printed in 200034 with embedded electrical motor. (h) The same robot with the soft composite material as an actuator embedded instead of the electrical motor.

The actuator was 3D printed on a lab-made desktop 3D printer, which uses a 14 gauge syringe tip for the best results and is able to print with two materials at once, while the robotic demonstrators were printed on commercially available FDM machines: the Ultimaker 2+ used PLA to print the sleigh robot, while the Stratasys uPrint fabricated the tetragonal evolved robot using ABS. Once the artificial muscle had been 3D printed into the correct shape, eight volts of power and a thin, resistive wire were used to electrically actuate the artificial McKibben muscle. Multiple robotic applications were used to test the 3D printed actuator and muscle, and it displayed a “significant expansion-contraction ability.”

When electrically heated to 80°C, it was able to expand up to 900%, and computer controls helped the autonomous unit perform many motion tasks. The team will keep working to improve upon their work, and the first order of business is to replace the embedded wire with conductive materials, to give the muscle a longer shelf life while also increasing its response time. A long-term goal will be to “involve artificial intelligence to learn to control the muscle, which may be a last milestone towards replicating natural motion.”

Miriyev said, “Our soft functional material may serve as robust soft muscle, possibly revolutionizing the way that soft robotic solutions are engineered today. It can push, pull, bend, twist, and lift weight. It’s the closest artificial material equivalent we have to a natural muscle.”

The study was funded through a grant awarded by the Israeli Ministry of Defense, and also through the university itself.

Discuss this story and other 3D printing topics at, or share your comments below.

[Source: Columbia Engineering]


Facebook Comments

Share this Article

Related Articles

RAPID 2019: BASF, Origin and ECCO Partner to Produce Footwear

University of Athens Researchers 3D Print Electrochemical Sensing Platform, Testing with Caffeine & Mercury


3D Design

3D Printed Architecture

3D Printed Art

3D printed chicken

You May Also Like

Bioprinting for Bone Regeneration with Nanofiber Coated Tubular Scaffolds

Researchers from both Mexico and Costa Rica have joined efforts to further research into bone regeneration via bioprinting, allowing doctors and surgeons to create patient-specific scaffolds for improved treatment. 3D...

Thesis Student Creates Business Case for Desktop 3D Printing E-Cigarette Cases

Thesis student Calvin Smith, at Minnesota State University, brings up a topic most 3D printing enthusiasts and users should be interested in as he explores the limits—and endless possibilities— of...

China: 3D Printing Customized Meshes for Separating Oil and Water

Researchers from China are trying to refine mesh fabrication for exercises such as separating oil from water, with their recent findings published in ‘3D Printing of an Oil/Water Mixture Separator...

Case Study: A 3D Printed Patient Specific Partial Finger Prosthesis

From the University of Nebraska at Omaha, researchers Keaton Young, James E. Pierce, and James M. Zuniga explore prosthetics made via 3D printing in ‘Assessment of body-powered 3D printed partial...



View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our

You have Successfully Subscribed!