AMS X

Italy: Studying Properties & Geometry of Scaffold-Like Structures for Tissue Engineering

Formnext
IMTS

Share this Article

Italian authors Claudia Pagano, Lara Rebaioli, Francesco Baldi, and Irene Fassi explore the unique details of creating scaffold-like structures in the recently published ‘Mechanical behavior of scaffold-like structures: Research of relationships between properties and geometry.’ In this study, the focus is on scaffold geometry and stability, and how mechanical properties are affected.

Scaffolds today are used in a wide range of tissue regeneration and engineering applications, serving as porous structures based on networks promoting the growth of human tissue. The researchers realized for this study that it was critical to confirm the relationship between stiffness and strength and the size of samples in ‘polymeric parts’ structured like scaffolds. PLA ‘scaffold-like samples’ were printed and tested for tensile strength, slicing the 3D models in Simplify3D using a Sharebot NG 3D printer. Samples were printed to include ten replicates for each height of 6, 12, 18, and 24mm.

a) Model of the structure geometry b) specimen examples

Each of the specimens was evaluated regarding density, porosity, and mass.

Picture of the compression test set-up

Loading curves for each specimen demonstrated:

  • First region (R1) – load increases linearly
  • Second region (R2) – characterized by abrupt reduction of slope
  • Third region (R3) – just beyond the knee

“By analogy with the behavior of cellular materials, and by considering the compression direction and the specific 3D structure, it is likely that: in the linear elastic region R1, the load is mostly borne by the material in the filament junctions of the adjacent layers; at the knee (R2), the plastic collapse of the structure occurs, based on localized yielding phenomena of the constituent polymer; in R3, the porous structure undergoes a progressive accumulation of plastic deformation and the filaments crash together, resulting in an evident distortion of the specimen.”

a) relative stiffness b) relative strength

The authors also note that because of the polymer strength offering more influence, ‘with respect to stiffness,’ that element should be taken into account when selecting material to build a structure; in fact—and of course this makes sense in any construction project—a comprehensive knowledge is critical to the success of any design and consequent structure that is created later.

“In case the mechanical behavior of a typical scaffold structure could be described by referring to properties intrinsic to the system (independent on the geometry/size) the structure could be treated as an effective ‘3D material,’ and the scaffold design could be easily produced and its performance predicted,” concluded the researchers.

“Several parallelepiped-shaped specimens with different sizes have been fabricated and their mechanical stiffness and strength measured by compression tests. The results have showed that the porosity degree controls the stiffness and strength of the 3D structure. Only the strength, taken as the stress at failure, is intrinsic to the examined structure (thus behaving as a ‘3D material’ concerning the mechanical strength), whereas for the stiffness, a specimen size dependence has been observed. The polymer properties have a stronger influence on the 3D structure strength rather than on its elastic response.”

The successful fabrication of scaffolds is becoming more important to research today—and to patient-specific treatment in areas such as bone replacement, mesh reinforcements, and classic tissue engineering.

What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

[Source / Images: ‘Mechanical behavior of scaffold-like structures: Research of relationships between properties and geometry’]


Share this Article


Recent News

3D Printing News Briefs, August 13, 2026: 510(k) Clearance, Dental Resin, Project Call, & More

The Formlabs X1 Versus the HP 1200: Costing, Throughput & 30% Packing Density



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

Featured

Chinese 3D Printer OEM Targeting Market for Tiny Metal Parts Closes Pre-Series A Round

Earlier in the year, a consortium that includes China’s BLT announced a major breakthrough in using a high-precision, liquid metal UV 3D printing process to upgrade the hinge for Chinese...

Sinterit and DyeMansion Join Forces as Polymer LPBF Enters Its Next Competitive Phase

The entry-level laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) polymer space is heating up. Whereas in metals it’s Chinese vendors offering breakthrough low-cost products, in polymer it’s HP and Formlabs enabling easier,...

The SLS Market, Game of Trucks: Part 2

With the release of the new HP 1200 and the Formlabs X1, we can see real competition from very different segments. From several million dollars to just $20,000, the laser...

The SLS Market: Game of Trucks

This is truly an exciting moment in the SLS market. With HP‘s release of the 1200 and Formlabs‘ release of the X1, we can see the SLS market heating up....