Additive Manufacturing Strategies

Optimizing Multi-Head FDM 3D Printing

ST Medical Devices

Share this Article

International researchers are delving further into FDM 3D printing, investigating details that have an impact on prints, with their findings outlined in the recently published ‘Optimizing Design Patterns for Multi-Head Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Systems.’

In this study, the team made up of researchers from the National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure (NASENI) in Nigeria and Texas A&M University, experimented with numerous settings and patterns, such as:

  • Nozzle diameter
  • Extrusion width
  • Layer thickness

Patterns were then tested for:

  • Appearance/surface finish
  • Strength
  • Speed
  • Stiffness of composite materials

“The quality and mechanical properties of a FDM print are largely dependent on several print parameters and process variables,” state the researchers. “For a single head printer, the strength and stiffness of the print prototype is low. This led to the need to improve the strength and stiffness of print prototypes for improved quality and mechanical properties.”

Using a UprintPlus 3D printer, researchers created four test blocks in a range of shapes and sizes for both calibration and simulation. Upon investigating calibration, the team inspected both layer thickness and model interior type, whether solid or sparse fill.

“The ‘real improvements in quality’ in terms of Volume Fraction percentage fills were determined for all layer patterns. Volume Fraction is very important role in determining the quality of material parts,” stated the researchers. ‘Volume Fraction’ is a mathematical element that shows the percentage of bead volume that fills the entire volume of a 3D printed model. It may also be referred to as the ‘percentage volume fill.’

ABS material was used for testing, with the test samples created in SolidWorks and then imported into CatalystEX and Simplify3D.

“Of major importance in the calibrated results was the print quality as a function of the print time and print quality as a function of the volume fraction and time put together. The results obtained helps to get the real quality of prints on FDM processes,” explained the research team.

Sizes for each test block were carefully thought out—and while dimensions varied, thickness remained the same for each.

Dimensions of test blocks

Volume fraction ranged from 55 to 96 percent throughout the study, depending on the type of model interior. Solid interiors exhibited the highest volume fill—meaning few voids and greater strength and durability.

“Block 3 had the best volume fraction for both layer thicknesses at solid interior fill. The solid interior fill showed the highest volume fill available which means that there are little or no voids in the printing. Fewer voids mean better strengths and stiffness and more durable parts,” concluded the researchers. “This was confirmed by simulation of all blocks. It also showed the best surface finish for all types of fill. Printing with small layer thickness produced higher build times but stronger prints. This goes to prove that print quality of a 3D printed part is a function of the volume fraction and time put together.”

Possibly the most ubiquitous form of 3D printing, FDM techniques abound—and they are also continuing to be studied around the world, sometimes integrated with other technologies like SLA, compared with PolyJet, and experimented with regarding color, mechanical properties, and more.

What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts; join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

[Source / Images: ‘Optimizing Design Patterns for Multi-Head Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Systems’]

Share this Article


Recent News

3DPOD Episode 93: Bound Metal 3D Printing with Mantle CEO Ted Sorom

Eco-Friendly 3D Printing: Sustainable Luxury Handbags Enabled with AM



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: January 16, 2022

We’re back in business this week with plenty of webinars and events, both virtual and in-person, starting with the second edition of the all-female-speaker TIPE 3D Printing conference. There are...

3D Printing News Briefs, January 12, 2022: Rebranding, Bioprinting, & More

First up in today’s 3D Printing News Briefs, Particle3D has gone through a rebrand, and a team of researchers developed a way to 3D print and preserve tissues in below-freezing...

3D Printing News Briefs, January 5, 2022: Software, Research, & More

We’re kicking off today’s 3D Printing News Briefs with 3D software, as Materialise has integrated Siemens’ Parasolid with its own Magics software. Moving on, The Virtual Foundry launched a metal...

3D Printing News Briefs, January 1st, 2022: CES 2022, Standards, Business, & More

Happy New Year! We’re starting with this week’s CES 2022 in today’s 3D Printing News Briefs, then moving on to a new AM standard and business news from Roboze and...


Shop

View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.