NASA has made a wide range of forays into 3D printing—and for decades now. From 3D printed rocket engine parts that will pave the way for creating future components to continued efforts for developing 3D printed habitats on Mars, NASA has been and continues to be involved in advancing 3D printing technology.
Now, NASA engineers are getting involved in improving the 3D printing process itself, rather than just impressing us with what they are creating with the technology. Monitoring while printing has become a feature expected by savvy users today, especially from the desktop. But what about industrial processes—where often more is on the line in terms of material and product? Thanks to NASA, monitoring may soon be expanded further for additive manufacturing. This will allow for more opportunity to correct AM processes in real time, with the obvious benefits of less waste in materials and energy, and greater expediency overall. Users are able to pause the prints and make corrections as needed.
With the creation of a method for in situ dimensional inspection of AM parts, researchers at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center offer helpful technology for inspecting internal features like fluid channels and passages—areas that are difficult to check after printing. According to NASA, it also means the potential is there for including a closed-loop feedback system to make automatic corrections. The monitoring system employs cameras that are both visual and infrared, allowing the user to see the print in progress.
The IR cameras collect temperature data needed for validating thermal math models, and the visual cameras collect details for constructing precise models. This new technology will also reduce false positive readings.
Samples created through both laser-sintered plastic and metal processes have been tested by the NASA team:
“The technology detected errors due to stray powder sparking and material layer lifts. Furthermore, the technology has the potential to detect anomalies in the property profile that are caused by errors due to stress, power density issues, incomplete melting, voids, incomplete fill, and layer lift-up,” stated NASA. “Three-dimensional models of the printed parts were reconstructed using only the collected data, which demonstrates the success and potential of the technology to provide a deeper understanding of the laser-metal interactions.”
The monitoring system offers increased flexibility as it can be implemented in existing systems with reduction in time, energy, and waste for parts that are nonconforming. The IR and visual cameras allow for greater accuracy both thermally and spatially. NASA foresees the technology being useful in aerospace (for injectors, coolant components, heat exchangers), automotive (exhaust systems), and medical (orthopedic implants) applications. Discuss in the NASA forum at 3DPB.com.[Source / Images: NASA]
You May Also Like
Sustainable Cabin Built on 3D-Printed Concrete Stilts from Infested Ash Wood
Our house had several ash trees in the front and back yard while I was growing up, and we lost three of them due to various acts of nature. Ash...
UK Researchers: Single-Droplet Resolution for 3D Printed Functional Synthetic Tissues
Researchers from the UK have completed a unique study in 3D printed networks, releasing their findings in the recently published ‘Controlled packing and single-droplet resolution of 3D-printed functional synthetic tissues.’...
University of Auckland: Growth-Induced Bending of 3D Printed Samples Based on PET-RAFT Polymerization
4D printed objects are 3D printed objects made with smart materials that respond to environmental stimuli, like liquid and heat, or return to an original form after deformation. Researchers from...
G-ID: Identifying 3D Printed Parts Through Slicing Parameters
There are multiple ways to identify specific 3D prints, such as QR codes and bar codes, RFID tags and watermarks, and serial numbers. But a group of researchers from MIT...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.