Clearing Hurdles for Metal AM

Share this Article

Riven’s James Page will be speaking at 3DPrint.com’s upcoming AMS online industry summit (Feb 9-10, 2021). Register here.

Metal AM has made incredible advances in recent years and global brands are contemplating series production AM parts for flagship products.  Yet a bottleneck remains – often unacknowledged – one that if left unaddressed will fundamentally limit the speed, reach and growth rate of the industry:  The black box that is the new product introduction (NPI) process.  It is not uncommon to spend weeks or even months iterating the complex, murky steps that lie between design and shipping of complex metal AM parts.

Heavy bets are being placed on advances in build simulation software as a primary remedy.  And this strategy has begun to pay off by increasing success rate – particularly for powder bed fusion which got a head start due to its highest-end applications.  Metal binder jetting, which is poised to take on new and larger markets, is also progressing but simulation has a way to go. And while we anticipate continued build sim/prep progress to be made for all AM processes, the many separate steps and potential sources of defects, including post-processing, secondary ops and finishing, means that checking the integrity of first articles, adjusting parameters and iterating all sub-processes remains a serious bottleneck.

Metal AM parts warp during sintering – without complete data they can take many iterations to perfect

The challenge is due largely to the difficulty in understanding the nuances of as-manufactured part shape – whether for green part defects, warping during sintering, assessing fixtures, machining or a host of other post-processing steps. Engineers are faced with either the limits of error-prone hand tools like calipers, or waiting days for technician time and programming of a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). Either way, they are still forced to make rough guesses based on sparse point measurements and so the iterations pile up and ship dates get pushed out.

But all is not lost – in true engineering spirit, this problem has spurred innovation and a new way is emerging that is far more efficient.  Accurate 3D capture has now become push-button simple and so cost-effective that it can be used at every engineer’s desk and coupled with every AM system.  Cloud-based software has become smart enough to automatically show at-a-glance exactly what needs to be adjusted.  3D visualization of deviation from the design tells the whole story so engineers can catch problems early, take decisive action and save iterations.

A metal binder-jet part (left), push-button 3D capture (center) and automatic CAD-compare (right)

While current practices for metal binder jetting (and similarly bound metal deposition) may require many attempts to produce a tricky part with tight specs, engineers with access to easy, accurate 3D scan data and cad-compare are often able to run just a single test print before getting to a build of shippable parts.

Complete 3D capture of as-manufactured shape enables automatic go/no-go decisions at-a-glance

Riven has worked hand-in-hand with leaders in metal AM, MIM and other advanced manufacturing methods for years to understand their specific NPI challenges and to hone an integrated system with cost-effective 3D capture sensors and easy software that makes the NPI process far simpler.  We believe that rapid visualization and team communication using complete as-manufactured 3D shape data is the key to accelerating NPI and scaling operations – especially for complex, multi-step metal AM products.

Riven Software (left) accepts data from any 3D scanner.  An integrated sensor (right) is available as part of the package.

New forms of data analytics and automation applying this 3D data will drive advancements in metal AM.  The next exciting chapter is now unfolding with APIs that enable shape and vector-displacement data to be automatically captured from every build and coupled with build-process software and additive manufacturing execution systems (AMES) including machine learning.  This will finally close process loops to achieve a new level of efficiency. Easy, cost-effective 3D capture and data collaboration will accelerate the NPI process.  And 3D data APIs supporting advanced applications will be a crucial tool for those building the future with metal AM.

Share this Article


Recent News

3D Printing Financials: voxeljet Posts Earnings Loss for Q1 2021, Revenue Up 4.5%

Daimler Buses Rolls out Mobile Facility for 3D Printing Spares



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Guns

3D Printer Reviews


You May Also Like

Kawasaki’s 3D Printed Spare Part Flown to Ship via Drone

One of the few businesses tackling the world of maritime 3D printing is Wilhelmsen, one of the largest businesses in the maritime sector, along with its partners, such as steel...

Featured

Saab Test Flies 3D Printed Replacement Part for Gripen Fighter Jet

While 3D printed spares are seeing increasing use in rail transport, it is now seeing deployment in an even more high-performance application: the repair of fighter jets. Swedish military firm...

Featured

SOLIZE Using HP to 3D Print Car Parts for Nissan’s NISMO

Japanese CAD and 3D printing company SOLIZE will be using HP 3D printers to make out-of-production spare parts for NISMO, the tuning and motorsport division of Nissan. SOLIZE is a...

Italian Trolleybusses Get 3D Printing Treatment with On-Demand Spares

3D printing is playing an increasing role in the production of spare parts for public transportation and mass transit, particularly in countries outside of the U.S., where those sectors are...


Shop

View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.