RAPID

ORNL Scientists Make Fake Fish with 3D Printing and Sensors to Research Environmental Impact of Hydropower Dams

AMS X

Share this Article

Hydropower – electricity generated with the energy of moving water – is the largest source of utility-scale energy storage and renewable energy in the US, making up 6% of the country’s total generation of electricity. But, developers need to research how the environmental impact to fish populations can be reduced when they renew a hydropower project or license a new one. Fish can get into all sorts of injury-causing trouble, such as turbulence, turbine blades, and pressure changes, when they swim through hydropower dams. Before changing or creating a new project, you need to consider how big each fish is and where its center of mass is, the thickness and angle of turbine blades, and how fast they’re spinning.

Researchers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in Tennessee have supported hydropower in the past, through improving regulatory processes and licensing, but they decided to dig a little deeper this time…or should I say swim? ORNL created a system to analyze the impact of turbine designs on high-value species, like certain types of fish, for its hydropower-related environmental assessment work.

There’s not much in the way of standardization when it comes to hydropower projects, as these dams are mostly built to meet the power needs of the customer and constructed according to the geography of the specific site.

“We want to produce hydropower in a way that’s not damaging to the fish passing through. There is a lot of pressure on power dam owners and operators to reduce their environmental impact. There are lots of challenges, and giving fish safer passage is one of them,” explained Mark Bevelhimer, a recent ORNL retiree who launched the project, which was funded by ORNL’s Laboratory Directed Research and Development program.

ORNL scientists are combining their expertise in environmental science, physics, sensors, and additive manufacturing to create model fish for use in testing of hydropower turbine designs. The project supports healthy ecosystems and hydropower—the nation’s largest renewable energy resource.

The scientists decided that their best bet would be to build an anthropomorphic test device (model fish, in layman’s terms). The fish models could generate multiple data points for analysis, and help the team better understand the forces of turbine blades.

“We want to understand the forces different fish species encounter and how those forces may result in injury or mortality. There may be tweaks that turbine designers and manufacturers could make that would conserve fish species while at the same time minimizing the impact on energy production,” explained Ryan Saylor, a Bredesen Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Education student working in ORNL’s Environmental Sciences Division.

They used 3D printing to build the fake fish models. We’ve seen 3D printed fish and fake fish with 3D printed parts used in research projects before, from studying fear and anxiety to saving the real thing. But rather than using the technology to create the actual fish models, they instead made 3D printed molds to make them, which is much faster and less expensive. The scientists brought real fish to the Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF), a US Department of Energy-designated user facility for 3D printing at ORNL, where they were laser-scanned. Then, a CAD design program used the contours to make 3D printed molds of the fish that would be tested.

“Each species has a different morphology, so making molds allows us to capture those differences. We can make a one-of-a-kind fish pretty easily,” said Brian Post, who led the MDF effort. “If you were to conventionally produce the molds, it would take longer to subtract the shape out of a block of material.”

3D printed molds let the researchers create a variety of fish models in a shorter time period. Ballistic gel, developed originally for the military, was used to make the fish bodies, as it can be controlled for multiple densities to simulate muscle tissue. Cinnamon oil, an inexpensive antimicrobial agent, was mixed with the gel, and the combination was poured into the molds and left to set.

In order to make them as close to the real thing as possible, the scientists tested how “squishy” each fake fish was. Once they were satisfied, the fish models were then coated in a plastic-like paint that mimics skin and scales and makes them more rigid.

“Mimicking biology is difficult. We’ve worked to get as close as we can to a good representation without the use of specialized equipment that could increase costs,” said Saylor.

The final step was embedding sensors in the fake fish, which measure acceleration and G-force in three dimensions in a turbine simulator. Additionally, strain gauges measured how the fish models would contract or stretch because of the simulated turbine blade strikes.

So far, the ORNL scientists have 3D printed molds for, created, and tested models for four different fish species so far – bass, bluegill, rainbow trout, and shad. But they’re not done with the model yet – they’re continuing to make improvements, such as increasing the response rate in order to achieve advances in data analysis and extraction, as well as a higher resolution of the data itself. This way they can make hydropower dams more fish-friendly, which supports a healthier ecosystem. They

Discuss this story and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts in the Facebook comments below.

(Source/Images: ORNL)



Share this Article


Recent News

Nikon AM Synergy Gets Defense Innovation Unit FORGE Contract

The AM Applications Game: Where Additive Manufacturing Is Actually Winning



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

Featured

Getting Down to Business at AMS 2026: Desktop Revolution, Dental Market & More

At the recent Additive Manufacturing Strategies (AMS) 2026 in blizzard-stricken New York City, those who were able to make it through the wind and snow got right down to business....

AM Applications Expected to Reach $110B in 2034, New Report Finds

Additive manufacturing may still be a relatively young industry, but the number of real parts being produced with 3D printing is growing quickly. According to a new report from Additive...

AMR Webinar to Reveal 2025 3D Printing Market Data and What 2026 Will Really Look Like

On March 24, 2026, Additive Manufacturing Research (AM Research) will host a free webinar that many in the industry won’t want to miss. Titled “3DP/AM Market Insights: 2025 Review and...

Melotte Partners with amsight and Additive Center to Reduce CT Scanning for 3D Printed Semicap Parts

The first report for Additive Manufacturing Research (AMR) that I wrote solo was about the AM market opportunity in semiconductor capital equipment (semicap) components. Published in early 2024, the report...