Metal 3D Printing: Correlation Between Laser Power, Cooling Rates & Effects on Parts in LPBF Processes
US scientists are learning more about power, temperature, and the effects on metal 3D printing processes, with their findings outlined in the recently published ‘Subsurface Cooling Rates and Microstructural Response during Laser Based Metal Additive Manufacturing.’
LPBF is being used more commonly in additive manufacturing processes today due to a list of benefits offered to industrial users—whether they seek the ability to create prototypes quickly or create more complex geometries (one of the greatest advantages in 3D printing overall).
Scientists, manufacturers, and many different users are also able to engage in using a variety of metal powders that are more efficient for creating objects. Because of the process, however, involving the rapid melting of powder and then re-solidification, there are expansive thermal gradients to consider—along with cooling rates that can affect the outcome of structures. The researchers used this study to ‘quantify cooling rates’ and then compare them to the quality of the printed product, centered around Ti-6Al-4V (Ti-64, 90%Ti, 6% Al, 4%V – by weight) as their material system.
Titanium is used in manufacturing often today because it is strong, light in weight, and resistant to corrosion. This material has been the focus of many studies, testing its ability to lend stability to other 3D printed parts, make medical devices like implants, use with other techniques, and more.
Titanium, usually displayed in one of two allotropic forms (the room temperature hexagonal close-packed α-phase and the high temperature body-centered cubic β-phase) is often used in the following applications:
- Power generation
“As with other metallic components, the microstructure and phase in Ti-64 is intimately linked to the thermal histories during the manufacturing process and is well characterized for conventional manufacturing,” state the authors.
“For LPBF fabrications on the other hand, where Ti-64 is commonly used, the link between build parameters, such as the laser speed and power, and the resulting phase and microstructure is tenuous and mostly derived from trial and error methods.”
Previous research has shown to be ‘insensitive to subsurface effects,’ state the authors, leaving no previous methods for examining thermal exercises, an area which could be ‘critical’ to the understanding of AM metal printing.
Analysis in this study, however, resulting in a method for tracking crystalline titanium phases during LPBF. Each phase was tracked with fixed atomic coordinates and thermal parameters, along with multiple scale factors and lattice parameters added by the authors.
The level of cooling rates confirmed consistency ‘within statistical uncertainties,’ leading the authors to consider such activity during the melting transition to be negligible, along with any developing strain. Cooling rates caused the heated volume to increase, leaving decreased thermal gradients, and ‘less effectiveness of the surrounding material as a heat sink.’
Overall, the researchers proved that in this study, the cooling rate depended on laser power parameters—with the resultant β-phase component bearing most of residual material strain.
“We also observe a uniform redistribution of V in the resolidified region in contrast to the starting base material which correlates to a reduction in β-phase fraction,” concluded the researchers. “These insights are crucial to formulate a sound theoretical underpinning of the LPBF process in general, and to understand how the properties of AM manufactured Ti-64 components can be predicted.”
What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.[Source / Images: ‘Subsurface Cooling Rates and Microstructural Response during Laser Based Metal Additive Manufacturing’]
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Stay up-to-date on all the latest news from the 3D printing industry and receive information and offers from third party vendors.
You May Also Like
Axtra3D Brings Hybrid Laser-DLP 3D Printers to Market at Formnext 2022
At Formnext 2021, startup Axtra3D attracted attention for the launch of its Lumia 3D platform, which relies on the company’s patented hybrid photosynthesis (HPS) technology. Now, just in time for...
Operation Warp Speed Alum Joins Fortify as CEO
Fortify, an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and additive manufacturing (AM) materials company, has announced Lawrence Ganti as the company’s new CEO and Board Director. Having served most recently as president...
UnionTech to Showcase New 3D Printers, Material, and Software at Formnext 2022
Achieving a deeper presence in the industrial 3D printing market, UnionTech offers a broad range of 3D printing products ranging from industrial 3D printers to materials and software. For Formnext...
Bigger, Faster, Stronger: New Projector 3D Prints Powder Plastic Parts Better than SLS
Thanks to a new infrared (IR) projector from digital light processing (DLP) manufacturer Visitech, it’s now possible to 3D print polymer parts with results that exceed those of selective laser...