In ‘Microfluidics as a Platform for the Analysis of 3D Printing Problems,’ authors Rui Mendes, Paola Fanzio, Laura Campo-Deaño, and Francisco J. Galindo-Rosales explore new ways to tackle ongoing issues with fluid flow in FFF 3D printing.
For this study, the authors decided to create several different types of printing conditions in microfluidics, defined as:
- The Deborah number
- The Reynolds number
- The Elasticity number
The microfluidic nozzle was created in 2D with CAD software, and up to four different scale ratios were shown:
Each microchannel possessed its own inlet and outlets, with a contraction in between acting as the cross-section of the nozzle. The authors used photolithography to create the master for cast moling, and UV light to transfer ‘the geometry of the channels’ from a photomask to photosensitive substrate. They noted that shear thinning was more noticeable when the concentration of polymers was larger. For the study, three samples were created.
Upon analyzing the four microfluidic nozzles, they noted three different flow patterns:
“… at lower [Math Processing Error] and [Math Processing Error], it was possible to observe a laminar profile, very similar to a Newtonian fluid-flow at low [Math Processing Error], where the fluid stayed attached to the walls of the microchannel without any disturbance; as the elastic effects increased, a second zone was visible, where the flow detached from the walls upstream of the contraction and the typical printing conditions were located; and, finally, if the [Math Processing Error] and [Math Processing Error] were further increased, large vortices promoted a preferential central flow path,” stated the researchers.
It was possible to see the formations of the vortices ‘upstream’ of the contraction, with the research team noting that the elastic efforts of the analog fluids led to lower velocity than the extruded one.
“Eventually, they could even lead to a formation of solid pieces, promoting clogging. Furthermore, the vortex creates a zone of under-extruded material, which can accumulate near the walls up to the point it escapes between the filament and liquefier, resulting in a back-flow effect that leads to a catastrophic failure in a 3D printing process,” concluded the researchers.
“This work constitutes a first microfluidics approach to elucidate the physics behind the main problems in a printing process when using viscoelastic polymers. In future works, a wider range of analog fluids should be studied, not only to further complete the flow pattern map, but also to replicate the exact conditions of the printer and to discover the critical [Math Processing Error] and [Math Processing Error] values that potentiate a laminar flow.”
Microfluidics and 3D printing accompany each other in many a research lab today as scientists create new designs, assess miniaturization also, and examine such structures in connection with bioprinting. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.[Source / Images: ‘Microfluidics as a Platform for the Analysis of 3D Printing Problems’]
You May Also Like
Luxinergy Using Biocompatible Resin & In-Vision’s HELIOS Light Engine to 3D Print Orthotics
Custom medical devices called orthotics are used to hep patients recover from injuries and correct body misalignments, and can also relieve pain. Unfortunately, it takes a long time to make...
Sindoh’s New Large-Scale S100 3D Printer First to Use Materialise Bluesint PA12
This week, Korean 3D printer manufacturer Sindoh announced the launch of its latest 3D printer. The new Sindoh S100 is the company’s first large-scale industrial polymer system, and is called a...
3D Printing Webinar and Virtual Event Roundup: March 13, 2021
From a new 3D printer and the future of industrial 3D printing to the hazards of AM fumes, a lot of different topics are being covered in the webinars and...
3D Printing Financials: Materialise Revenue Up 11% Since Last Earnings Report
A leader in additive manufacturing (AM) and medical software, Materialise (Nasdaq: MTLS) was optimistic after posting its earnings report for the fourth quarter and full-year 2020. Even though the last...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.