Additive Manufacturing Strategies

Improving Metrology in Additive Manufacturing

ST Medical Devices

Share this Article

International researchers explore the role of additive manufacturing for geometrical measurements, along with current requirements and the potential for future research. Their findings are outlined in ‘Geometrical Metrology for metal additive manufacturing,’ as the researchers explain what an impact 3D printing and AM processes will continue to have in the world of manufacturing, including everyone from the DIY user with a workshop in the garage, to those running enormous factories.

Geometric metrology benefits from 3D printing technology due to latitude in the creation of more complex geometries—with impressive impacts being seen already despite the relative youth of AM. While conventional techniques still rule the manufacturing world, AM continues to show greater promise.

“AM does not currently have the benefit of the over one hundred years of research into the production of components that is the hallmark of precision subtractive techniques,” state the researchers. “The following reasons to measure part geometry remind us why so much effort is devoted to measuring manufactured components – all of these also apply to AM, although in many cases, AM can avoid assembly processes.”

An embodiment of additive manufacturing dated 1972. Metal powder (2) delivery into an energy source/s (7/7a) to create a part (15) built from a baseplate (1)

Further benefits include:

  • Better control of manufacturing processes
  • Greater efficiency in production time
  • Less waste
  • Improved energy efficiency

Along with that, the researchers list the following identified ‘medium to high priority standardization gaps:’

  • Application-specific design rules and guidelines (high).
  • Design guide for surface finish capabilities (medium).
  • Technical data package addressing form/fit and qualification requirements (high).
  • Dimensioning and tolerancing requirements (high).
  • Measurement of AM features such as lattices (medium).
  • Protocols for image accuracy (medium).
  • Dimensional metrology of internal features (medium).

Geometric tolerancing is ‘critical,’ in terms of inspections, and the researchers present concerns regarding AM design content with existing standards and the presence of features like lattices and cellular materials—along with customized textures and graded parts. Other research efforts have focused on meeting some of the challenges presented in both pre- and post-processing, along with efforts to produce smoother surfaces and avoid systematic errors, occlusions, and other issues.

Standards framework agreed by ASTM and ISO for future development of additive manufacturing standards

Research is underway to both maximize object coverage whilst at the same time minimizing both measuring time and the amount of manual intervention in the measurement planning. Integrating methods from artificial intelligence into the measurement process is showing promise but requires much more research into measurement automation, versatility, and traceability,” concluded the researchers.

“There are evidently significant challenges ahead, but also room for growth, for the measurement technologies and systems dedicated to in-process metrology for AM.”

Example lattice structures in a range of lightweight part designs. (a) shows a cross-section through an AM part with an internal repeating cellular structure, (b) shows a tetrahedral lattice conforming to a complex shape (in this case a component for a commercial airliner), and (c) shows a lattice structure in a topology optimized part featuring internal routing channels for structural health monitoring

And although 3D printing and metrology may sound like a more complex mix than some research and development entails today, other companies are instilling additive manufacturing processes in their companies with great success, as well as consulting with others on critical projects like 3D scanning and preserving historical items, creating comprehensive metrology labs, and further examining effectiveness.

What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

[Source / Images: ‘Geometrical Metrology for metal additive manufacturing’]

 

 

Share this Article


Recent News

Electronics 3D Printing: Analysis of Rogers Corp’s New Dielectric Material for AM

MakerBot Adds 3D Printing Filaments from LEHVOSS to METHOD 3D Printers



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

Thought3D’s Inline Filament Dryer Could Save Your 3D Printing Filament

Many filaments are hygroscopic, absorbing moisture from the air. In a few days, your PLA filament will absorb enough air to become brittle. Nylon (polyamide) filaments will fill with air...

MakerBot METHOD X 3D Printer Receives GREENGUARD Certification for Clean Air System

This summer, MakerBot took a major step towards safety by introducing the smart Clean Air System for its METHOD and METHOD X 3D printers, which features a dual filtration system...

MakerBot Simplifies ABS 3D Printing with RapidRinse & ABS-R Materials

After working to make its METHOD and METHOD X 3D printers safer with the launch of its smart HEPA filtration system, Stratasys subsidiary MakerBot is now focused on making its...

Featured

Prusa Debuts Automated 3D Printing Farm: Implications & Analysis

Prusa Research announced that it is launching an automated print farm at Expo 2020 Dubai. Prusa Research is Josef Prusa’s firm, which has developed the most prevalent 3D printer line...


Shop

View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.