Gómez points out that the field of CT metrology still faces challenges in trying to estimate measurement uncertainties, “mainly due to the plethora of influencing factors contributing to the CT measurement process.” His thesis attempts to further understand the role of variables affecting the precision and accuracy of CT dimensional measurements. The main CT variables he investigates are temperature in the X–ray CT enclosure, number of projections for a CT scan, workpiece tilt orientation, sample image magnification, material thickness influences, software post–filtration, threshold determination, and measurement strategies.In some experiments, Gómez contrasted the results against simulations performed in Matlab software and another simulation tool called Dreamcaster.
“For dimensions of geometric features ranging from 0.5 mm to 65 mm, a comparison between dimensional CT and CMM measurements, performed at optimized conditions, typically resulted in differences of approximately 5 µm or less for data associated with dimensional lengths(length, width, height, and diameters) and around 5 to 50 µm for data associated with measurements of form, while expanded uncertainties computed for the CT measurements ranged from 1 to over 50 µm,” he states.
He also assessed methods for estimating measurement uncertainty of CT scanning. He presents a thorough study of metrics used for proficiency testing, including tests of statistical consistency (null-hypothesis testing) performed with Monte Carlo simulation, and applies them to results from two recent CT interlaboratory comparisons.
Gómez’s study is important when applied to additive manufacturing because, particularly in fields such as aerospace, precision of parts is of the utmost importance. A flawless method of measurements must be established, and CT scanning has great potential, and is indeed already in widespread use. But it’s not perfect, as Gómez points out, and his thesis attempts to assess and better understand its limitations.
“In particular, it is shown that the use of the En-metric in the current state of CT interlaboratory comparisons could be difficult to interpret when used to evaluate performance and/or statistical consistency of CT measurement sets,” he continues.
One of the benefits of additive manufacturing is that it can create parts with complex geometries, both internal and external, and those can be difficult to measure, especially non-destructively. QA for 3D printing is still problematic for many parts. CT scanning is a largely reliable method for measuring the complicated internal channels and features that additive manufacturing is known for, and Gómez’s work is a big step toward making it even more reliable.
Discuss this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below.
You May Also Like
3D Printing Custom Hearing Device Parts at 2X Efficiency with Figure 4
3D printing has made significant impacts in nearly every industry, and on every scale too. This includes markets many may not have considered, unless they had a need for products...
3D Scanner Buying Guide 2020
3D scanning is now an engrained business process in industry, architecture, quality assurance and reverse engineering. It is, however, quite a difficult process to master. Many different 3D scanning technologies...
2021: 3D Delta Week Focused on 3D Printing in the Benelux Region
An international multi-event for the 3D manufacturing sector, called 3D Delta Week, will be taking place for the first time next summer. From June 7th through the 11th, 2021, four...
How to Manage the Complexity of a 3D Printing Service
At first glance, most 3D printing projects look easy. To most of you, 3D printing is not complicated at all, but to customers, it can be quite complex. I can...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.