Boooooom! A bomb goes off on the battlefield, and it is instantly proceeded by the unfortunate casualties of war. Limbs are lost, and soldiers are killed, yet not all of the injuries are an effect of bomb fragmentation. Many injuries to solders in the vicinity of an explosion are caused by the substantial and rapid air pressure change that results from a blast of a high-order explosive, such as C4 or TNT. These shock waves, have the ability to penetrate a soldiers helmet and cause significant brain damage or even death.
Because of this significant risk posed to soldiers, the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) is creating 3D printed models of the human skull, in order to study the effects of these powerful shock waves on the inside and outside of the skull, as well as on the skull itself. In doing this, they hope to be able to create enhanced military helmet pads, shells and other protective gear.
It’s not new for the U.S. Army to use synthetic human bones for the study of wartime occurrence on the human body, however, traditional synthetic bone is not always an accurate means of measuring the effects of a potential incident. They are mostly designed for use by doctors when practicing surgical procedures, thus they are not exactly the best specimen to test the effects of a massive bomb blast on.
Another method of study, in the past, as well as the present, has been the use of donor skulls, from individuals who have passed away and donated their bodies to science. However, this also has some problems.
“The mechanical properties of the human skull change with age and depend on the health of the individual. Donor skulls that may be available for testing would typically come from older people, and the properties of those skulls can be highly variable and may not have the same response as the average skull of the Army soldier population,” explained Dr. Thomas Plaisted, materials engineer in the Materials and Manufacturing Science Division at the Army Research Laboratory (ARL).
So the Army has turned to 3D printed cranial bones, which look and behave like the skulls of 20-30 year old soldiers. The bones are 3D printed using the Army’s own synthetic bone capturing material. They are created with a specialized material that is made with the specific goal of allowing a consistent response to stimuli (in this case, explosions). To create the replicas, researchers take a CT scan of a real human skull, and then 3D print them using composite materials. All of the details need to be kept consistent, such as density of different parts of the skull. Once complete, they will use the models to test new helmet padding materials on them, under simulated bomb blast scenarios.
“The goal is to determine how the pads and helmet shell materials protect the head from injury,” Plaisted said. “We are developing new helmet padding materials to improve the impact protection afforded by the Army’s helmets. The helmet can withstand impact at a certain velocity while protecting the head from accelerations that would lead to injury. In the extreme case, excessive acceleration may lead to skull fracture.”
Earlier in the year the the ARL team tested their first 3D printed synthetic bone against that actual bone. The test included hitting the synthetic bone at a high velocity, and comparing it to the fracture patterns of an actual bone. They determined that the synthetic printed bone was a ‘close match’. Plaisted also stated, that next the ARL will try and determine the limits of resolution that they can achieve with 3D printing. The 3D printing of these synthetic skulls is expected to commence sometime this fall.
This is just another one of the many uses of 3D printing that the U.S. Army is either already using, or is investigating potential uses for. The technology seems to have a very important future for the U.S. military.
What do you think? Will the 3D printing of skulls be able to provide researchers with a better understanding of the effects caused by explosions during combat? Discuss in the 3D Printed Cranial Bones forum thread on 3DPB.com. More details on this story can be found in the video below.
You May Also Like
3D Systems Finalizes Sale of On-Demand Business, Will Operate as Quickparts
Pioneering additive manufacturing solutions provider 3D Systems finalized the $82 million deal for the sale of its on-demand 3D printing and custom manufacturing business. The rebranded company will operate as...
3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: September 19, 2021
We’ve got another busy week of webinars and events to tell you about! Topics in this week’s roundup run the gamut from 3D digital textures and FDM 3D printing potential...
3D Printing News Briefs, September 18, 2021: Business, Materials, & More
We’re filling up the front of today’s 3D Printing News Briefs with plenty of business, as one company celebrates an anniversary and two others welcome new executives to their ranks....
3D Printing Service Hubs Appoints New CEO, Alex Cappy
Changes are taking place at Hubs since it was acquired by manufacturing service provider Protolabs (Nasdaq: PRLB). Not only has the subsidiary removed the “3D” from its name, but it...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.