AMS X

DTI & Partners Developing 3D Printed Electronic Space Robot Skin

Formnext

Share this Article

Robotics is among the most intriguing long-term prospects for the additive manufacturing (AM) industry, something I recently wrote about in the context of BLT and China’s buildup of industrial robotics for use in supply chains such as electronics and power grid repair. That piece highlighted how 3D printing can be leveraged as something of a “swing production method,” capable of alternating between producing end-use components for consumer goods, as well as parts for other industrial equipment.

There are a number of additional factors which make AM a good fit for the robotics market, as a new use case from the Danish Technological Institute (DTI) highlights. In a project funded by the European Space Agency (ESA), and building on earlier work completed in 2024, DTI and its private sector partners are exploring how to make 3D printed ‘smart skin’ for robots deployed on space missions.

The researchers designed the skin to solve several different challenges faced by robotic systems during space exploration, including thermal management, protection from dust, and the optimization of human-robot interface (HRI) scenarios. DTI worked with three companies on the project: PIAP Space of Poland, Redwire Space, based in Luxembourg, and Hungary’s Admatis, which specializes in the sort of advanced materials enabling the entire project.

In addition to the performance objectives already mentioned, using wearable electronics also made it easier for the researchers to engineer other aspects of the robot’s structure: for instance, AM’s bespoke design capabilities allowed the team to create the ideal shell to route the robot’s data and power lines. The 3D printed skin also enhances the durability of the robot’s design, as it gave the partners the opportunity to incorporate sensors improving the robot’s motion control system.

In a post on LinkedIn, AM design specialist Andreas Weje Larsen, one of the individuals who worked on the project, said, “Central to this is computational design of the space grade scaffold structure, using compliant mechanism synthesis — essentially applying conventional use of topology optimization ‘in reverse’ to design flexibility instead of stiffness. This is a key innovation for AM in space and beyond.”

That last point in the quote above about “in space and beyond” is what I love most about DTI’s approach to the project. Along with the rationale behind the primary, space-oriented angle for the case study, DTI put just as much thought into the ‘dual use’ angle, i.e., the potential to use the same innovation for applications based on Earth.

In particular, DTI’s summary of the terrestrial possibilities for the smart skin project focuses on the sorts of jobs in harsh environments which would seem to be the best candidates for future deployment of robotic workers. Some of the examples the researchers have in mind include “wet agricultural fields,” electronics recycling sites, and, generally, extreme environments that are remote from population/infrastructure hubs.

This specific line-of-thinking is ingenious in itself, but even more importantly, I’m impressed that the DTI researchers gave that much consideration to the precise dual use possibilities for the R&D work, and incorporated that thinking into the foundation of the design. Too often, when we see the phrase ‘dual use’ in a project like this, the researchers seem to just be taking for granted that someone will come along at some point and leverage the relevant (typically, defense) application for commercial purposes. I think that leveraging 3D printing as a dual use technology would be a far more feasible undertaking if researchers were given more freedom to explicitly structure their work in a dual use direction from the outset.

Finally, returning specifically to the viability of AM for the robotics market, the product-market fit between the quantity of parts that AM is currently best suited for, and the quantity of parts needed by robotics manufacturers, is perhaps the most compelling reason why we should expect to see these technologies more and more closely linked as they both continue to evolve. In terms of the present case study, it’s easy to envision the emergence of a market for on-demand skins that fulfill various functions requested by the customer. That’s exactly the sort of output level requirement which allows AM to thrive.

Images courtesy of DTI



Share this Article


Recent News

Several New Engineering and Dental 3D Printing Materials Recommended

These 3D Printed Lattices Can Sense Damage Before Failure



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

3D Printing News Briefs, August 22, 2026: Polymers for CubeSats, Animal Mobility Devices, & More

We’re starting with defense news in this weekend’s 3D Printing News Briefs, before moving on to polymers for CubeSats and 3D printed prosthetics. We’ll end with a story about engineering...

Pusan National University & ORNL Develop Elastomeric Liquid Crystal Actuators

Researchers from Korea’s Pusan National University and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) have developed 3D printed elastomeric actuators. In a paper published in Nature, the team used elastomeric liquid crystal...

Scientists Use BMF to 3D Print Seal Whiskers That Track Prey Long After It’s Gone

Seals use their whiskers to hunt. Not Navy Seals, although they may in some way also, but this article is about lowercase seals. Not Seal the musician either; as far...

Harvard’s Jennifer Lewis Lab Is 3D Printing Artificial Muscles That Twist and Bend on Demand

Researchers at Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) have developed a new way to 3D print materials that can move on their own, bending, twisting,...