2022 Predictions: 3D Printing Post-Processing


Share this Article

As we begin 2022, one of the most obvious trends we can see developing is in finishing components. As I’ve said before, we make the shape in the machine, but the part itself in post-processing. Hot isostatic pressing (HIP), depowdering, resurfacing, shot peening, dyeing, destressing—they all have a huge part to play in 3D printing.

With porous parts, any smoothing is welcome. At the same time, several processes will be needed in conjunction if we are to make consumer-friendly items. Functional surfaces, special coatings and unique finishes will also allow components to outperform traditionally made counterparts. Post-processing also saves money by automating tasks traditionally done by hand. If we want to make millions of parts cost-effectively, we have to reduce the 30 percent outlay in manual labor. By automating finishing we can also gain quality advantages and reduce errors overall.

I believe that, although the post-processing market trails the overall 3D printing market, a boom is emerging in the space. As people switch from having one machine to three and as companies grow more ambitious, finishing needs will rise spectacularly. We only make tens of millions of parts in hearing aids, dental indirect, dental direct, orthopedic and medical, jewelry molds and in mascara. Yes, the Chanel mascara brush is one of the most prevalent 3D printed items, but go ahead and keep pushing to get that deal with the car guys. As more applications for millions of parts will be unlocked and more companies use 3D printing in business operations, I would expect a rapid adoption of post-processing solutions for 3D printing.

What do other people in our industry have to say? We asked some leaders in our community to opine about the future of post-processing.

Tuan Tranpham, Chief Revenue Officer for Azul 3D, at the startup’s RAPID booth

Tuan Tranpham, currently CRO at Azul3D, is a 3D printing maven and packs a lot of experience and vision. He looks at finishing technology holistically.

“Customized material and print productivity (cost-per-part) will unlock mass production (towards the new world of ‘AMAZON: 3D printing AWS.’ More 3D printers will have eyes (vision/in-situ monitoring) and brains (machine learning). More automated post-processing equipment will enable the most exciting new vertical of 2022 = ‘Consumer’ due to its high volume. Metal binder jetting will surpass MEX (Metal FDM) in terms of revenue. [With the 3D printing industry having raised] over US$2 billion in new funding and triple the amount of startups [in the space], the year 2022 will be the year of correction (time to ‘deliver’ promises).”

I completely agree on 2022 being the year of promises, as well as the fact that monitoring and ML will be a more important component of the whole. Actually, I agree with everything except maybe Tuan’s beliefs about binder jet and metal extrusion. That could still go either way if BASF or Markforged pushed hard or if a fused deposition modeling (FDM) company pushed into it.

A vision of an automated 3D printing factory with AM-Flow products. Image courtesy of AM-Flow.

Someone who is remarkably close in his thinking to Tuan is Carlos Zwikker. Carlos is also a long-time 3D printing veteran, having played a part in green-lighting Shapeways while it was under Phillips, helping develop Ultimaker, and, now, as the CMO of AM-Flow. AM-Flow wants to automate the sorting, quality assurance (QA) and handling of 3D printed parts.

“What we hope—and expect—is that the industry will continue to grow. This growth will automatically put pressure on the development of efficiency improvements, and software will be crucial in making this happen,” Zwikker said. “Without this software, without this automation, the AM industry will have  difficulty to scale and to truly deliver on the general benefits AM provides, such as less waste, local production, and full freedom of design. Automation will contribute to lowering costs and, thus, making more business cases for various AM applications viable, which in turn will result in more growth. In short, automation will be the flywheel of the industry.”
Zwikker went on to highlight the sort of developments that will come about from collecting all of the data generated for 3D printed products.
“AM-Flow is building an in-line quality control unit that will provide data on the quality of the print at and between all stages of post processing. By being able to measure more of 3D printed parts, AM will become a data driven industry,” Zwikker said. “Automation will improve post processing in various ways. It will bring efficiencies and speed, reducing cost and lead times, improving quality. AM-Flow’s In-line Quality unit will also provide data e.g. on the quality of dyeing, the quality of surface treatment, feeding back this data to improve on parameter settings for each individual post processing activity. This IoT aspect of the AM production line of the future will contribute to what many refer to as Industry 4.0.”

Here, we can see how Zwikker places his firm at the center of a vision of knowing all about a part at each production stage. I think that this is a really important development to note. To me, post-processing steps have such a huge influence on parts that we should check at each step. I also really believe that 3D printing is so highly variable due to every component being made in a different orientation and location in the machine that we need to do individual QA of every single part. I’m so glad that Zwikker sees this, too.

Adrian Maier-Ring of AM Ventures is a key investor in 3D printing. He’s been ahead of the market time and time again with timely venture capital (VC) investments.

“I think we will see some nice serial applications (if they are publicly shared). And anything that enables these will remain key. Furthermore, I believe that the industry especially needs even more people that have the courage to building up a production with AM and just do it,” Maier-Ring told us.

Adrian subtly points out a critical issue. Publicly, there is shared excitement about jigs, car parts, aviation, space, and more. However, deep in the bowels of companies big and small, many components are serialized but not disclosed. It could be a bridge manufacturing item or a part of a large machine, but this does provide a distorted view about what is working. His second point is key, as well: people need to just take the leap. I’ve heard about so much fence-sitting for the past two years.

Solukon is a leading depowdering machine provider for the metal industry and works with just about every space business. Its CEO and CTO, Andreas Hartmann, is focused on data.

“The acquisition and evaluation of production data for quality assurance and process optimization has always been one of the most important factors in industry. In additive manufacturing, too, all process data from all production steps must be recorded and evaluated in order to meet the industry’s quality and efficiency requirements. Powder removal like Solukon’s is the first step in post-processing and has a decisive influence on all subsequent processes,” Hartmann said.

Hartmann really stresses that all steps and players have to work together in concert. With parts being altered by every process, I think that this is a very important thing to take into account.

Luigi Monaco, of Pulvermeister, which has very affordable and very high-end powder removal and resurfacing solutions for polymers, suggested the following:
“The main trend will be that powder-based 3D printing will move from grubbing around in powder cake manually to machines doing this work, for the sake of better industrial quality and to start realizing the disruptive power of this generative branch of plastic part production. I hope that this transition will happen fast, simply to have more and better plastic parts available for all small and midsize companies. It will be these companies that create new markets, with lower financial risks and with diverse products and functionality unseen until today.”
I really like Monaco’s focus on SMBs. We all tend to focus on large firms in AM, but a lot of the growth and innovation comes from smaller companies. Targeting enormous, labyrinthine businesses may actually take a long time to accomplish, whereas smaller firms may be much quicker to pull the trigger and innovate.

3D printed, post-processed midsoles from the iAMfootwear project. Image courtesy of DyeMansion.

Philipp Kramer is the Co-Founder & CTO of DyeMansion, which leads the world in integrated dyeing, resurfacing, and finishing solutions for polymers,
“We see a clear trend of new factories being planned and executed with the goal of enabling full automation in high-volume scenarios,” Kramer said. “Still key for DyeMansion as a technology provider is to serve smaller companies with high mix low volume scenarios as well, but also those customers that now require automated loading and unloading concepts. Machines need be integrated with a high grade of flexibility into their automated factories. Not only physically, but also digitally. Even though the volumes are often not so high today to justify full automation, the foundation is laid already and implemented in a step by step approach depending on the number of parts. The acquisitions of several MES providers in 2021 will hopefully accelerate the adoption of a broader audience with more sales and consulting power. This will reduce costs and streamline processes.”
I enjoy Kramer’s mention of software here and find this a very hopeful vision. If we can continue to grow in SMBs, as Monaco says, and have more dedicated factories, then we should see an accelerated and more fundamental growth in the new year.
Many of these topics will be discussed in the Automation, Rapid Manufacturing and Software vertical, sponsored by GE Additive, at the upcoming Additive Manufacturing Strategies event, March 1-3. Additionally, SmarTech Analysis has published the industry’s first and only report, titled “Automation, Additive Manufacturing and the Factory of the Future, dedicated to these topics.

Share this Article

Recent News

3D Printing News Briefs, May 18, 2024: Sustainability, Mass Spectrometry, & More

3D Printing Financials: Velo3D Sees Better Q1 2024 After Difficult Last Quarter


3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns

You May Also Like

Printing Money Episode 17: Recent 3D Printing Deals, with Alex Kingsbury

Printing Money is back with Episode 17!  Our host, NewCap Partners‘ Danny Piper, is joined by Alex Kingsbury for this episode, so you can prepare yourself for smart coverage laced...


Insights from Cantor Fitzgerald on AM’s Q1 2024 Landscape

A recent survey by Cantor Fitzgerald sheds light on the persistent challenges within the additive manufacturing (AM) industry in the first quarter of 2024. Based on responses from 38 industry...

3D Printing Financials: Xometry’s Scaling up and Strong Start to 2024

Xometry (Nasdaq: XMTR) kicked off 2024 with strong results, boosting its marketplace and technology to new heights. Both revenue and gross margin soared, fueled by an expanding global network of...

3D Printing Financials: Desktop Metal Targets Recovery Amid Net Losses and Revenue Downturn

Despite facing a decline in revenue and the persistent challenges of a tight economic climate, Desktop Metal (NYSE: DM) is making strides toward operational efficiency. The first quarter of 2024...