The Case for Cost-effective High-performance Aluminum AM Alloys

Share this Article

Rusal America’s Adam Travis will be speaking at’s upcoming AMS online industry summit (Feb 9-10, 2021). Register here.

At the risk of immediately alienating anybody who has built a successful business printing AM parts from cast aluminum alloys, I’m going to get right to it:  Aluminum AM needs shaken-up (again).  If you’re not too put off by my hot take, I’ll explain why I think that’s the case.

If we look at the arc of metal AM adoption by alloy family, according to SmarTech, we see that aluminum alloys are dead last when stacked up against titanium and nickel alloys.  And that’s not because there are fewer things made out of aluminum in the world.  In fact, according to the USGS, globally in 2019, aluminum production outpaced nickel by a factor of ~70 and titanium by a factor of more than 500.  So why the difference then?  How can aluminum be so ubiquitous but aluminum AM so under-utilized?  To answer that we have to go back to when metal AM was first commercialized.

Fig. 1.  Global material production ratios v. AM production ratios by alloy family.  Material outputs normalized so that 1 ‘unit’ = total titanium material production.  Printing outputs normalized so that 1 ‘unit’ equals total aluminum printing output.

In the early days of AM, industry was looking for existing alloys that they could point towards the technology.  With titanium that leads you to Ti-64, with nickel you get 625 and 718, and with aluminum you’re left with cast alloys like AlSi10Mg.  And casting and AM (specifically Powder Bed Fusion) are about as far apart on the physics spectrum as two metal melting processes can be.  The problem then is that the overlap between applications for cast alloys and part designs that lend themselves to AM is too small.  A good old Venn diagram illustrates the problem simply enough (see Fig. 2).  There’s a large bubble for all of the cast aluminum alloy applications in the world and a smaller bubble for all of the parts that could be 3D printed from aluminum (note that not all of those parts are necessarily made out of aluminum today).  And, in the middle, there’s a tiny sliver where the two overlap.  That sliver is the entire AM market accessible to cast alloys.  And while great things have been done in that sliver, aluminum’s potential is so much more.

Fig. 2.  Cast aluminum AM application space.  Am-suitability encompasses many considerations including design and production cost.  Bubbles not to scale.

Which brings us to our first shake-up:  High-performance aluminum AM alloys.  For proof of how real aluminum AM’s potential is, just look at the number of companies that have gotten into the high-performance aluminum AM alloy design business in the past few years.  I can think of 10 without cheating and looking at my notes.  Clearly there is a mutual consensus that more can be done with aluminum AM.  And the combined fruits of their labors have been truly exceptional, providing higher strengths and elevated temperature stability and enabling the creation of previously impossible part designs.  Add on top of that the macro trends towards light-weighting and sustainability seen across industries, and aluminum looks even more promising.  Yet, again according to SmarTech, there were less than 3 metric tons of specialty aluminum AM alloys shipped in 2019 (about 3% of all aluminum AM for that year).

Make no mistake, that number and market share will grow significantly over the next decade.  But one may ask why it hasn’t grown faster?  We could make any other number of Venn diagrams to show the overlap with alloy maturity, qualification procedures, industry awareness, design expertise, etc.  But, by and large, the solution to all of those is time.  So, I propose we instead focus on a factor that we can do something about:  Material cost.  Now we need a new Venn diagram with bubbles for high-performance aluminum applications and AM-suitable part designs plus a new third bubble for cost-solving specialty alloys.  Our sliver between applications and part designs is a lot larger now (woot!).  But the solution space is narrower than ever because of the addition of cost—a space accessible by only a handful of the most select, high-value applications.  This will always be the case so long as premium properties carry premium price tags to match.

Fig. 3.  High-performance aluminum AM application space.  Bubbles still not to scale, in case anyone was expecting that to have changed.

Granted, cost will also improve some with time as adoption grows and economies of scale can be better leveraged.  But this alone won’t be enough to usher in the wide-spread proliferation of these alloys needed to realize aluminum AM’s full potential.  Which brings us to our second shake-up:  Holistic alloy design.  Specifically, high-performance aluminum AM alloys designed to prioritize not only properties and printability, but also material cost from the get-go.  This is not to say that properties and printability should be sacrificed in the name of cost.  In fact, it’s the opposite, saying that cost deserves equal weighting as an objective function to ensure that it doesn’t needlessly suffer in the name of the other two.

Holistic alloy design is nowhere more important than when ultra-high-value elements like scandium get thrown into the mix.  As alloy design becomes ever more sophisticated thanks to the use of simulation and artificial intelligence to enable increasingly novel compositions to be derived faster than ever, so too should our expectations for the outputs of the process.  It is no longer enough to state that the “best” alloy in a category is the one with the most impressive properties, but the one that can deliver those properties at a cost point that enables it to be widely utilized by industry.  Innovation theory tells us that it’s not technological achievement that leads to proliferation, but cost accessibility.  The first automobiles, for example, were a technological revolution available only to the select few.  It was the advent of the Model T, the first cost-effective automobile, that ushered in their proliferation and eventual ubiquity.

That’s not to say that cost-effective high-performance aluminum AM alloys are automobiles nor that they’ll have a societal impact on the scale that the automobile did.  But there is an ever-increasing amount of aluminum in cars.  And with the advent of holistically designed, cost-solving specialty alloys there will be even more, along with a lot of the other products that move us and make up our modern world.

See how Rusal is leading the way in holistic alloy design to create the next generation of aluminum AM alloys.

Share this Article

Recent News

Kings 3D Breaks Ground on $70M 3D Printing Hub in China

An Intertwined Future: 3D Printing Nanocellulose


3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns

You May Also Like

Regular, Medium, and Large Format 3D Printing Explained

At Additive Manufacturing (AM) Research and on, we use the terms regular, medium, and large format to segment the 3D printing market. We developed these terms to help bring...

Global Materials Group Acquires Canadian Hardfacing Metal Firm, Boosting 3D Printing Portfolio

Consolidation in the additive manufacturing (AM) service bureau segment continues to take place. The latest news sees international provider Wall Colmonoy acquire Indurate Alloys Ltd., a Canadian supplier of hardfacing...


Beyond Chuck Hull’s Legacy: the Unsung Heroes Who Paved the Way for 3D Printing

Next month, we will celebrate a huge anniversary. 40 years ago, on August 8, 1984, Charles Hull filed a patent application for stereolithography: the first additive manufacturing technique in history,...

3DPOD Episode 207: 3D Printed Electronics with Richard Neill, CEO of Advanced Printed Electronic Solutions

Rich Neill is refreshingly clear and direct about 3D printed electronics. His previous venture allowed him to start Advanced Printed Electronic Solutions with his own money, making him beholden to...