In the electronics industry, 3D printing has been used to fabricate sensors, stretchable electronics, and conformal electronics, and to make waveguide devices and antennas for microwave devices. That’s because the technology can be used to design dielectric substrates for specific applications and multilayer devices with several dielectric layers, working with a wide variety of materials at different densities.
Pushing the envelope further is a team of researchers from Miguel Hernández University of Elche in Spain, which published a study, “Low-Cost Additive Manufacturing Techniques Applied to the Design of Planar Microwave Circuits by Fused Deposition Modeling.” The paper details their work using an inexpensive FDM 3D printer and plastic-based filaments to manufacture and implement microwave electronic circuits.
“Since all commercial filaments available for this type of 3D printer are not intended to implement microwave devices, it is necessary to obtain the electrical parameters of each material (dielectric constant and loss tangent). Additionally, since FDM does not allow the printing of metallic materials and the conductive filaments currently available do not have high conductivity, for microwave circuits it is necessary to develop a technique for the metallization of 3D printing parts, using copper plates attached directly to the substrate, as it is done with conventional high-frequency substrates,” the researchers wrote. “Additionally, due to the fabrication process of the circuit, which comprises, on the one hand, the fabrication of a substrate based on a plastic pseudo-thermofused layered structure, and for the other, the use of epoxy adhesives to glue the copper boards, it is necessary to check if the whole process results in a reliable structure.”
The team chose a low-cost Prusa i3 Hephestos 3D printer for this study, which uses extrusion-based fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology. Cura software was utilized to adjust the various 3D printing parameters, below, for all of the materials used.
The researchers analyzed many standard 1.75 mm diameter filaments to “obtain different electrical properties for the design of microwave circuits,” and chose these to use in the study:
- PLA from German RepRap: polymer made of lactic acid molecules
- ABS from Fillamentum: amorphous, impact-resistant thermoplastic
- Iglidur I180-PF (Tribo) from Igus: friction-resistant, good response to wear degradation
- ASA from Fillamentum: UV- and water-resistant thermoplastic
- PLA Stainless Steel from Protopasta: made of PLA and grinded filament from pulverized stainless steel
- Laybrick filament from CC-PRODUCTS: made of sandstone, offers a similar surface finish to ceramic or stone
- Nylon 230 filament from Taulman: synthetic polyamide
- LayWoo-D3 filament from CC-PRODUCTS: made of wood fibers and PLA, offers a similar surface finish to wood
- Smartfil EP filament from Fillamentum: made of PLA and Calcium carbonate, offers a similar surface finish to limestone
As you can see below, the sheets forming the 3D printed microwave circuit substrates can be classified as either an outer layer or an inner layer. Because the mechanical stiffness of the substrate can be affected by how thick the outer layers are, the team states that they “should be solid with a filling pattern density percentage of 100%,” and fabricated in a rectilinear pattern in order to decrease surface roughness and avoid porosity. However, it doesn’t matter which fill density or pattern is used for the inner layers.
The 3D printed substrate was metallized by attaching two hydraulically pressed 35 µm copper sheets, using nonconductive 2216 B/A epoxy glue GRAY, to each side. The researchers built the microwave circuits with a Protomat S42 from LPKF numerical control milling machine, and once the glue has solidified the copper to the substrate, it can be used.
Any fabrication errors, like bubbles and voids in between layers, a lack of homogeneity in the layers, or too much adhesive, could result in potential failure of the 3D printed circuit’s structural integrity and performance. So, in order to “verify the correct metallization and fabrication of the substrate,” the team used fast and accurate but inexpensive ultrasonic nondestructive techniques to conduct a structural analysis, and turned to time and frequency domain analysis techniques of circuit C-scans to see if there were any structural issues or defects.
Additionally, the researchers characterized each filament’s electrical properties in the microwave frequency range, and implemented both standard and novel microwave filters in microstrip and stripline technology.
Finally, the team designed and fabricated simple planar microwave circuits in a proof of concept to demonstrate how feasible it is to use 3D printing for this application.
“The designed devices were manufactured and measured with good results, which demonstrates the possibility of using low-cost 3D printers in the design process of planar microwave circuits,” they wrote.
By following this team’s methodology, other researchers could learn to add more complex microwave circuit structures to their work, including designing waveguide filters “by means of periodic structures where the additive techniques allow the design of the waveguide sections to obtain a higher rejection bandwidth,” and where correctly configuring the 3D printer enables the design of a “coupling factor of the different filter sections.”
“The ultrasonic structural analysis has shown the reliability of the manufacturing process. Finally, to check the different possibilities offered by the additive manufacturing process presented, different simple and complex stepped impedance filters were implemented in microstrip and stripline technology. Good results were obtained in both technologies, with better performances when additive possibilities, such as different substrate densities are used, so it can be concluded that additive manufacturing techniques offer wide possibilities in the design of planar microwave circuits,” the researchers concluded.
You May Also Like
Dream M&As: 3D Printing Mergers and Acquisitions We’d Like to See in 2021, Part 2
Inspired in part by the acquisition of EnvisionTEC by Desktop Metal and of Origin by Stratasys, we’ve been brainstorming about the newly hot 3D printing stocks and renewed interest from investors in our markets. Is 2021 going...
Dream M&As: 3D Printing Mergers and Acquisitions We’d Like to See in 2021
Inspired in part by the acquisition of EnvisionTEC by Desktop Metal and of Origin by Stratasys, we’ve been brainstorming about the newly hot 3D printing stocks and renewed interest from...
3D Printing News Briefs, January 16, 2021: In-Vision, Evolve Additive Solutions, ASTM International, Arris & Skydio
We’re almost all business in 3D Printing News Briefs today, with lots of new board members and new employees to talk about. First up, In-Vision has welcomed a new management...
Desktop Metal (DM) Buys EnvisionTEC to Quickly Boost Revenues?
Wow. Publicly traded Desktop Metal (NYSE:DM) has just purchased EnvisionTEC for $300 million in stock and cash. For my part, I would have paid all my money to be a...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.