Researchers Tim Kuipers, Eugni L. Doubrovski, Jun Wu, and Charlie C.L. Wang have released the findings of a new study in the recently published ‘A framework for adaptive width control of dense contour-parallel toolpaths in fused deposition modeling.’
Adaptive widths are effective for use in FDM 3D printing, but as the authors point out, they can often be challenging to set. In this study, the researchers create a framework for numerous schemes in generating adaptive-width toolpaths. Today, users often employ technology with extrusion occurring along parallel toolpaths following along with the contour of the layer, leaving the authors to focus on these methods—along with discussing solutions for challenges found in narrower geometries.
When features vary from nozzle size, there may be issues with both overfill and underfill as respectively, a buildup of pressure is caused, or a decrease in stiffness that may threaten stability or cause features to be completely overlooked in printing. Such issues are more exaggerated in prints with smaller details; however, these problems may be avoided in using toolpaths with adaptive width.The toolpath is critical to printing, and the outcome of parts and prototypes. The amount of time in printing, cost of materials, and most importantly of all—material properties—are all affected. In FDM 3D printing, toolpaths should offer the following:
- A path for extrusion that is as continuous as possible, avoiding defects and failure
- Smooth performance—avoiding sharp turns and a longer printing process
- The ability to cover the contour region without underfilling
- No overlap in extrusion paths
The researchers began by creating a graph for the input polygon—as a skeleton, representative of the medial axis transform (MAT). Noting that the skeleton is meant to be visualized as ‘the union of cones,’ each point is raised to a height equaling the least distance from the point to the boundary of the polygon. Edges and nodes are discovered first, in the center. New nodes are then added, with the union of cones being sliced at regular intervals.
Toolpaths of 300 sample shapes were generated with the framework created by the authors, using four beading schemes.
The authors evaluated sample structures for:
- Print time
- Computational performance
- Comparison of beading schemes
Overall, the researchers found their framework to be stable in evaluation, further refined for thin contours and microstructure prototypes.
“Our framework is flexible, demonstrated by the several beading schemes which emulate existing techniques. The computation times of our framework are on par with the state-of-the-art library for performing offsets of non-adaptive bead width,” concluded the researchers.
“Compared to the naive approach of constant width toolpaths our beading scheme is expected to improve the stiffness, dimensional accuracy and visual qualities of the manufactured model. It is expected that as distributed beading schemes are implemented in commercial software packages and bead width variation control become commonplace, the practice of design for additive manufacturing can disregards some of the nozzle size considerations.”
Toolpaths are the topic of ongoing research around the world, from using them to avoid 3D printing collisions to creating different simulations and levels of optimization. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.[Source / Images: ‘A framework for adaptive width control of dense contour-parallel toolpaths in fused deposition modeling’]
You May Also Like
Is Bioprinting a Winner-Takes-All Market?
The current thesis on bioprinting goes a little something like this: bioprinting is a collection of a number of different technologies, all with potential. From inkjet, material extrusion, and stereolithography,...
3DPOD Episode 50: DARPA and More with Ken Church, nScrypt CEO
I’m a huge nScrypt fan and love the firm’s technologies. The way they’ve defined their “line in a tool” approach to additive is really inspiring to me. With nScrypt machines,...
AMS 2021: Deconstructing the Timeline to Bioprinted Organs
Automation, healthcare, metal additive manufacturing (AM), and bioprinting were the four big topics discussed at the 2021 Additive Manufacturing Strategies (AMS) summit. The two-day virtual event gathered experts for panel...
Looking towards a FRESH future in 3D bioprinting
FluidForm’s Adam Feinberg will be speaking at 3DPrint.com’s upcoming AMS online industry summit (Feb 9-10, 2021). Register here. On January 16th, 2021, President Joe Biden introduced his science team for the incoming...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.