3D Printed Sensors for Food Safety, Detecting Mycotoxin Zearalenone

Share this Article

International researchers have come together to explore how 3D printing can assist in food safety, detailing their findings in “3D printed electrodes for the detection of mycotoxins in food.”

While many of us may rarely worry about whether or not common food items are safe, scientists are continually working behind the scenes to improve both analysis and safety. In this study, the authors focus on better ways to detect mycotoxin zearalenone (ZEA), a contaminate of food sometimes found in cereals and other items like animal feed. Known as “poisonous secondary metabolites,” mycotoxins commonly cause growth of mold, and can be responsible for illness, the possibility of cancer, and fatalities. ZEA comes from the Fusarium fungi species and can be quite dangerous when it spreads in food storage areas.

Using an FDM 3D printer, graphene electrodes were fabricated to detect ZEA; however, pre-treatment activation was critical to ensuring performance of the electrodes. The authors used an existing method for pre-treatment, known to improve output signals substantially in detecting ZEA. The electrodes, of uniform dimensions with a length of ~4.5 cm and with a circular closed disc at one end, were designed using 3D modeling software, printed, and then soaked in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF).

Schematic representation of the fabrication from graphene/polylactic acid filaments of 3D-printed graphene electrodes and their pre-treatment for the detection of ZEA.

“The electrochemical sensing performance of the activated 3D printed electrodes was compared with those of bare glassy carbon (GC) and edge-plane pyrolytic graphite (EPPG) electrodes, to analyze any apparent differences in current signals obtained towards the detection of ZEA,” stated the researchers. “Additionally, the voltammetric signals obtained from the GC and EPPG electrodes provide a baseline comparison with an inert electrode and a sensitive electrode surface with reactive edge plane sites, respectively.”

Cyclic voltammograms of glassy carbon (GC), edge-plane pyrolytic graphite (EPPG) and 3D-printed electrodes (the latter fabricated from graphene/polylactic acid filaments) in the detection of 100 µM ZEA (vs. Ag/AgCl). Conditions: 0.01 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.2) as electrolyte, scan rate 100 mV s−1.

Noting that the 3D-printed graphene electrode seemed to be less electroactive than either the GC or EPPG electrodes, the authors saw that it still detected ZEA (evidenced by the anodic peak). Taking the next step to see whether it was possible to re-use the 3D-printed electrodes, the research team experimented with different solvents, as well as skipping the washing step altogether for some of the samples. Ultimately, the electrodes not subjected to washing showed a broader anodic peak. Further study caused the team to recommend that electrodes be washed in between measurements to avoid undesirable side products.

Acetone used in washing some of the sample electrodes could have been responsible for corroding parts and prompting a reaction with the graphene layer. The possibility of a “noisy voltammetric signal” could prevent the electrodes from detecting properly:

“Hence, it might not be appropriate to wash graphene-based electrodes with harsh chemicals in order to preserve the structural integrity of the surface layer. The results obtained show that a washing step between measurements is advantageous and crucial to obtaining reproducible results. Additionally, deionised water turns out to be an ideal solvent for washing used 3D-printed activated graphene electrodes,” stated the authors.

The design could be refined further with other conductive materials, promoting increased sensitivity as well as electrochemical response. The authors recommended the possible use of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) for better conductivity, and stated that additional study was needed, along with experimentation to test printed electrodes in real sample applications to find out more about interference in detection.

“This study opens the door for future improvements of 3D printed electrodes to maximize their performance through better electrode design, better choice of materials and further functionalization processes. Additionally, this proof-of-concept work opens the possibility of on-site customized fabrication of detection devices for food safety and inspection,” concluded the researchers.

While 3D printing is also associated with a variety of different types of food fabrication, many different projects have involved sensors, from monitoring diabetic health to inclusion in wearables and other materials. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts; join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

Calibration plots of (A) glassy carbon (GC) and (B) activated 3D-printed graphene electrodes. Conditions: 0.01 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.2) as
electrolyte, scan rate 100 mV s−1.

[Source / Images: ‘3D printed electrodes for the detection of mycotoxins in food’]

Share this Article


Recent News

AMS 2021 Early Bird Rates Increase on January 29

Sandvik & Co. Acquire Dental and Medical 3D Printing Firm Proxera



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

Thor3D & ProtoTech Solutions Combine 3D Scanning with Body Measuring Software

Germany and Russia-based handheld 3D scanner developer Thor3D, creator of such scanning systems as the Calibry and the (now discontinued) Drake, has been practicing its trade since 2015. Recently, the...

Maker of CREATOR Metal 3D Printer to Be Bought by Lumentum for $5.7B

There have been several important acquisitions in the 3D printing industry, including that of EnvisionTEC by Desktop Metal, Origin by Stratasys, and 3D Hubs by Proto Labs, leading us to...

Sponsored

Towards Zero Waste and Failures: AdditiveLab’s Customizable Simulation Enables Increase in Metal Additive Manufacturing Efficiency

AdditiveLab’s Mariam Mir will be speaking at 3DPrint.com’s upcoming AMS online industry summit (Feb 9-10, 2021). Register here. Metal additive manufacturing (AM) process simulation predicts the potential production outcome and gives vital...

Featured

Dream M&As: 3D Printing Mergers and Acquisitions We’d Like to See in 2021, Part 3

Inspired in part by the acquisition of EnvisionTEC by Desktop Metal, of 3D Hubs by ProtoLabs, and of Origin by Stratasys, we’ve been brainstorming about the newly hot 3D printing stocks and renewed interest...


Shop

View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.