Karthik Vaidyalingam Arumugam recently presented a thesis, ‘Effect of Process Parameters on Contour Properties in Inconel 718 Structures Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting’ to Linköping University, expanding further on additive manufacturing with metal.
Nickel alloy Inconel 718 was used to create samples for analysis, as researchers examined the effects of process parameters on contour properties in Inconel 718 (IN718) structures fabricated via EBM. Inconel 718 offers a higher Fe, Mo and Nb content with lower Ti and Al wt% than other Ni-based alloys, offering better strength, corrosion resistance, good weldability, and crack resistance.
The EBM process encompasses a variety of build parameters that can be optimized regarding features like the following:
- Beam current
- Focus offset
- Scan sequence
- Build temperature
Variations allow for better control parameters like melt pool size, depth of powder melting, and more.
Powder is critical to the quality of a part, beginning with characteristics like:
- Size distribution
- Chemical composition
“These characteristics result in a mixture of measures based on both theoretical and empirical-based methods,” stated the researchers. “It is essential for the powder to have good flowability, as it directly affects the density of the part. A large powder size density (PSD) will lead to poor flowability and a small PSD will lead to poor packing density.”
Samples for the study were 3D printed at University West on an Arcam A2X EBM machine. Three build parameters were varied during the project, including voltage, focus offset, and speed in printing.
Thirty-four samples were created overall. Two samples were fabricated with standard parameters and 5mm thickness. The others were 3D printed using 16 different build parameters, with thicknesses varying from 3mm to 5mm. Samples were cut along the build direction, and at mid-width of the tensile bar at an offset of 1-2mm.
“A moderate cutting rate was utilized, and adequate coolant was provided to ensure the samples did not overheat and to maintain a straight cutting line,” explained the researchers.
After hot mounting and grinding of any sharp edges, samples were polished and then hardness tests were performed, with microstructural investigation following.
“The presence of large lack of fusions and surface defects may have significantly affected the hardness values in case of some samples. Placement of the hardness indents at locations near pores could have resulted in reading that were not exactly accurate. While a series of indents were made to determine the average hardness, it could still prove to be only near optimal readings and not exact. The possible effects of γ” in the microstructure cannot be determined by the experiments carried out in this thesis. This is due to the limitations of the scanning electron microscope,” concluded the researchers.
“Finally, the nature and formation of the grain sizes have been compared for various process parameter. The pictures of grain structure obtained from the light optical microscope for each sample may vary due to factors such as quality of surface finish, etching parameters such as voltage and duration and lastly the light optical microscope parameters. The magnification and quality of images could have affected the comparison and study of the grain structures during the project. While care was taken to avoid all sources of errors, it is not possible to completely remove them.
Researchers today are involved in a wide variety of projects involving electron beam melting processes (EBM) for use with materials like tungsten, in applications like orthopedics, and in relation to biocompatibility. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.[Source / Images: ‘Effect of Process Parameters on Contour Properties in Inconel 718 Structures Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting’]
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Stay up-to-date on all the latest news from the 3D printing industry and receive information and offers from third party vendors.
You May Also Like
$1M to Drive Metal 3D Printing Adoption in ASTRO America Project with GE, Pratt & Whitney, and Honeywell
The Applied Science & Technology Research Organization of America (ASTRO America) has partnered with Pratt & Whitney, Honeywell, and GE on a project intended to ease adoption of metal additive...
Biden Admin Announces Flurry of Reshoring Actions, Including Council on Supply Chain Resilience
Yesterday, I posted about the over $6 billion in new funding for US advanced manufacturing related to batteries and semiconductor packaging announced by the Biden administration to be awarded in...
Taking on Metallic Glasses 3D Printing with AMAZEMET’s Lukasz Zrodowski
Metallic glasses (MGs), or amorphous metals, are materials with a disordered atomic structure, unlike the ordered crystal lattice found in traditional metals. This unique structure provides them with superior strength,...
AMS Returns with New Key Speakers from the World of 3D Printing
Additive Manufacturing Strategies (AMS) 2024, set to take place from February 6-8 in New York City, is shaping up to be a key gathering for the additive manufacturing (AM) industry....
Upload your 3D Models and get them printed quickly and efficiently.