Brigham Young University Thesis Student Focuses on Development of New Bioprinter, Ink, Parameter Optimization

Share this Article

Chandler Alan Warr recently submitted a thesis to Brigham Young University, outlining a comprehensive focus on bioprinting in ‘Development of a Novel Bioprinting System: Bioprinter, Bioink, Characterization, and Optimization.’

Warr’s goal in the study was to develop an entire bioprinting system, including not only the printer itself but also the materials (bioink), and a feedback system. Affordability was an important requirement, along with proximity to a research lab. Ultimately, Warr and his research team used a regular 3D printer and customized it for their requirements, using 3D printed parts and a newly designed motherboard, with ‘great contribution’ from Carnegie Mellon University.

The researchers were able to significantly improve printing capabilities of the initial hardware, along with creating their own bioink, and a feedback system featuring a Raspberry Pi and camera model for live monitoring. The team also created a new protocol for optimizing parameters during bioprinting, via open-source slicing software.

“The biomedical industry has produced several printers with proven capabilities in printing a variety of materials,” explained Warr. “These printers span from $10,000 to over $200,000 for industrial bioprinters and generally have a motor step size resolution of around 1 µm. However, it is becoming more popular to modify traditional 3D desktop printers to allow for syringe extrusion and further adapt them for various cross-linking needs that may come about depending on the bioink used.”

In this case, the team ended up buying a FlashForge Creator Pro 3D printer, which was exponentially less expensive, and modifying it for bioprinting purposes. As an added benefit, they also discovered that the initial capabilities of the printer were valuable to them and they did not want to give up any of those functions.

“We therefore decided to try and find a way to keep both motherboards mounted and be able to switch between the two when we wanted to do either plastic 3D printing or bioprinting,” explained Warr. “To solve this problem, we came up with a solution involving a large switch array that would switch the signal wires going to the motors from one board to the other as well as the power supply to each board.”

FlashForge Creator Pro 3D printer before modifications

FlashForge Creator Pro printer modifications A) SPDT wiring of switch array B) Example of the motherboard modifications C) Switchboard array to switch power supply and motor signals from one board to the other.

Upon making their modifications, the 3D printer was complete both electrically and mechanically; however, as they were considering what to do with the extruder, another bioprinter was bestowed on their lab in the form of a MatrixBioprinter, running on the same type of motherboard—a Duet WiFi. They began using this bioprinter also during the study as it was less cumbersome to move around, but there was still the issue of the extruder in the FlashForge to deal with, resolved with a small plastic insert offering the ability to print with plastic syringes.

In creating their bioink, Warr and his team examined previous research, settling with great interest on a suitable method for a supporting substrate. While the freeform reversible embedded suspension of hydrogels (FRESH) was appealing to them, Warr explained that they also found it to be a challenging process. They did not give up though, and not only did Warr and the other researchers learn to make the slurry, they discovered it worked ‘very well’ for them, producing good and ‘consistent results.’

Gelatin slurry used in Freeform Reversible Embedded Suspension of Hydrogels (FRESH) printing

They also experimented with using alginate in the bioprinting process for a few months, consisting of a two percent concentration forming an alginate shell that resulted in the need for additional calcium.

“One problem that became apparent was the fact that alginate swells as it is cross-linked, and that swelling ratio changes depending on the alginate concentration. This is one of the reasons that we started to look into other bioinks or blends that would provide properties that could be tuned to our needs,” said Warr.

Later in the study, they began experimenting with collagen; however, due to a lack of experience in purifying collagen and additional equipment that was not in the budget for their lab, the researchers decided to go the ‘unconventional’ route of creating a decellularized ECM (dECM) bioink as an ‘agglomeration’ of much of the previous research they studied.

Process of making the dECM. A) Decellularized porcine heart B) Powderized and lyophilized decellularized tissue C) Mixing of bioink during digestion process by acid and enzymes D) Initial addition of pH indicator showing acidic bioink after mixing E) Finished bioink with pH changed to neutral

Toward the end of the study, the researchers were able to create optimized parameters, along with developing two resins for tissue engineering that can also be used with Lab-on-a-chip.

“To continue this work, one of the next necessary steps will be to test the cytotoxicity and ability of the dECM bioink to allow for cell proliferation,” concluded the researchers. “The bioink will need to be reliably sterilized and tested with cells to see how they grow and if additional modifications need to be made. Following these cell tests, the printing of a vascular network would be an important benchmark.

“Another avenue of future work involves the modeling of the bioprinting process. This could consist of the modeling of the bioink being extruded into the substrate and the subsequent 64 diffusion of the bioink before cross-linking. The slicing of a desired CAD model could then be optimized and slicing parameters modified that would allow for the modeled extrusion of the bioink to produce the desired structure. This would truly optimize the resolution of bioprinters and allow researchers to see where the limit of resolution lies.”

Bioprinting has grown into an enormous area of study within the realm of 3D printing, allowing researchers to engineer tissue for seeding human fibroblasts, focusing on a variety of new techniques, and even working on futuristic projects like growing heart tissue in space.

What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

[Source / Images: ‘Development of a Novel Bioprinting System: Bioprinter, Bioink, Characterization, and Optimization’]

 

Share this Article


Recent News

3D Printing Functionally Graded Materials Gets an F

Dual-Light Handheld 3D Scanners Introduced by Shining3D



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

Featured

3D Scanner Buying Guide 2020

3D scanning is now an engrained business process in industry, architecture, quality assurance and reverse engineering. It is, however, quite a difficult process to master. Many different 3D scanning technologies...

Shining 3D & MAGARIMONO Partner for 3D Printed Shoes

STEP DIFFERENT. Heresy as the standard for the future. New footwear unbound by conventions. Possibilities through fusing material and technology. Processes never before challenged. We aim for footwear capable of...

SHINING 3D Releases Multifunctional, Handheld EinScan Pro HD 3D Scanner

Hangzhou, China-based SHINING 3D is releasing the latest member of its multifunctional, handheld EinScan Pro 3D scanner series, the EinScan Pro HD. Framed as able to accurately capture high resolution...

3D Printing News Briefs: April 30, 2020

We’re starting today’s 3D Printing News Briefs talking about some new products – SHINING 3D is announcing its new desktop 3D inspection system, and Recreus has launched a new polypropylene...


Shop

View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.