Profiling a Construction 3D Printing Pioneer: US Army Corps of Engineers’ Megan Kreiger

The world of construction 3D printing is still so new that the true experts can probably be counted on two hands. Among them is Megan Kreiger, Portfolio Manager of Additive Construction (AC) and the Department of Defense’s subject matter expert of AC at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC). To become a pioneer in such a novel industry, Kreiger, like the rest of those experts, may have found herself at the right place and at the right time.

As a graduate student at Michigan Technological University, Kreiger worked under open-source legend Dr. Joshua Pearce, where she focused on distributed manufacturing and recycling. During that time, she was immersed not only in the world of open-source RepRap 3D printers, but also found herself engaged with the school’s Civil Engineering department, under Dr. Tess Ahlborn consolidating literature on ultra-high-performance concrete and the like—such that, when she found a position at the ERDC’s Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) in 2015, she immediately got roped into AC.

“At ERDC-CERL, we were pursuing the ‘Automated Construction of Expeditionary Structures Project,’ which was really intended for just producing one structure and seeing what the capabilities of the field were. We had a partnership with NASA Marshall Space Flight Center and NASA Kennedy Space Center and I started out on the technical team.” Kreiger relayed. “I started with the idea of taking a RepRap and turning it into something that was construction scale and would be easily maintainable for the field.”

Over time, ERDC-CERL established individual teams dedicated to printer development, structural, materials, energy and other pieces of the AC puzzle. This led to the first full-scale printed concrete building in the Americas:

“Basically, we felt like the project wasn’t moving fast enough. So, we essentially built our first larger printer in about two months’ time. Then, within that same year we built a full-scale printer that was capable of doing a 16 foot by 32 foot by eight-foot-tall structure. We made pretty big headway within essentially a year of printer development. That was all in parallel while NASA was also developing a printer.”

Deployable Construction 3D Printers

Since then, ERDC-CERL has completed numerous AC projects (some of which 3DPrint.com has had the opportunity to witness live) across the Joint services with more than 12 academic partners, as well as the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Naval Research Lab, Military personnel, multiple private sector companies, and other government organizations. The lab has a comprehensive, wide-reaching program that covers everything from basic research into printing systems, as well as materials development and characterization, to reviewing potentially permanent occupiable structures printed by contractors.

Because the Army Corps of Engineers isn’t in the business of simply making and selling 3D printers, the group is focused on developing AC technologies for strategic applications. Namely, AC is ideal for expedient construction projects in locations outside the continental United States, including Hawaii and territories like Guam, where logistics are a significant challenge. In turn, a key difference between the work that Kreiger and the ERDC team is pursuing and those of the commercial manufacturers has been a focus on the deployability of the machines.

For instance, the printers that the ERDC-CERL team has created do not typically include precision rails that would be difficult to clean and maintain. Rather, they are based on chain-and-sprocket or truss designs. Another differentiator is the fact that most commercial systems feature a large horizontal element for the Z-axis. Although this adds stability and overall print quality, it limits on-site construction possibilities. Instead, CERL removed the horizontal member, which in turn makes it possible to print in between other objects and without collisions.

“If you’re military personnel stationed thousands of miles from home and a part on your printer breaks, imagine every time you place an order, it could take six months to receive that part. Is your printer essentially out of commission for half a year, becoming more of a burden than a tool?” Kreiger said. “The goal, then, is to utilize parts that are globally available or perhaps compatible with other military equipment and parts.”

Additionally, the systems must be lightweight and compact, usually fitting within a 20-foot-long shipping container. Because cranes aren’t readily available where these printers might be deployed, they also have to be able to be unpacked by hand or with small forklifts.

“We’re heavily focused on expeditionary applications,” Kreiger said. “That means being able to take a printer and go to the field, where you don’t have a whole lot of logistics to support you. Our printing systems are all designed to be able to be easily relocatable, set up on the job site within an hour to begin printing with a variety of materials.”

The ability to use local materials has become a key factor for deployable machines. In the case of Guam, her team was able to develop a mix using a new combination of additives and aggregates using materials on the island in just a few days.

Because the AC segment is so new, there is still much more to be done—not just technologically, but in terms of quality and standards across the sector. In a subsequent article in this interview series, we learn from Kreiger about where construction 3D printing stands in terms of these crucial areas and the role that she has played in advancing them.