AMS 2026

The Ethics of Reviewing 3D Printers and How I Go About Them

RAPID

Share this Article

What makes a good review? Technical knowledge? Image quality? Verbiage? Honesty? Yes, but there’s an order. As a reviewer of 3D printers, I have wanted to prioritize not making “ads” for companies, but also not bashing them for their mistakes. How do I balance these two extremes? Ethics and personal morals.

Getting The Printers

To start, I need to get a printer to review. In every case, whether I am approached or I approach them, I ensure all printer manufacturers agree to have no influence over the review. They cannot see the review until it is published, along with everyone else.

Every company and I agree that I will receive a 3D printer solely for the purposes of a review. The only time I contact the manufacturer between the agreement and letting them know it’s done is if there are any issues or complications. For example, I reached out to Peopoly to get help diagnosing a failed linear motor on the Y axis. For the Prusa CORE One, I asked to get a textured PEI sheet so I could test TPU without ripping apart the smooth PEI sheet.

Accuracy Test from the Formlabs 4L

The Testing

In my testing, I try to keep all the reviews as consistent as possible. I test tolerances, accuracy, quality, speed, and noise level. I also discuss price and repairability. I try to offer a perspective that aligns with not just a hobbyist, but a small business or even a large business. I want to convey the possibilities of having a given printer (let’s call it X) in a small print farm or a support role for your business.

CF-PETG Printed on the Peopoly Magneto X

Writing The Article

I write all my notes about each machine’s performance, advertised capabilities, and realistic capabilities. I then take these notes and condense them into paragraphs, which I have an AI, like Gemini or Grok, review and suggest grammatical improvements. AI doesn’t ever change what I have to say or create anything new. I use it only for grammar and punctuation.

Dual-Color Shift Handle from the Flashforge Guider 3 Ultra

Article Review and Publication

Once I have an article ready to go, I upload it as a draft, and several editors can review it and act like an AI, provide me with tips and suggestions, and submit my draft to be published at a future date. Once the article is published, I email the article link to the manufacturer of the printer and that is it. I have been asked many times to remove the article or to make changes. I have not and will not make any changes or remove any article that I am asked to change or remove. The only changes that I do consider are if any spelling errors or typos are caught. Otherwise, all opinions are mine and mine alone and stay.

All images courtesy of Orville Wright.



Share this Article


Recent News

3D Printing News Briefs, December 11, 2025: Circular 3D Printing Farms, Depowdering, Composites, & More

REM Develops Finishing Process for CP1



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

7 Ways ASTM is Making AM More Ready for the Real World

Known for setting industry standards, ASTM used this year’s Formnext to launch a global, seven-part initiative to help 3D printing move faster from research to the factory floor. ASTM focused...

Colibrium Goes After Serial Production With Its Most Powerful M Line Yet

Colibrium Additive, the GE Aerospace-owned metal AM business, was at Formnext 2025 in Frankfurt this week to introduce its latest machine upgrade: a 4 × 1 kW version of the...

Materialise Launches New CO-AM Tools Amid New Industrial Phase in AM Software

When Materialise launched its CO-AM platform about three years ago, the company aimed to leverage cloud-based engineering capabilities to enhance the openness of the additive manufacturing (AM) software experience and...

Featured

Formnext 2025 Day Two: Cost Out & LAPIS

I, for one, think the lack of carpet is a fitting metaphor. They normally throw it out after a few days of use, so not having a carpet leads to...