What makes a good review? Technical knowledge? Image quality? Verbiage? Honesty? Yes, but there’s an order. As a reviewer of 3D printers, I have wanted to prioritize not making “ads” for companies, but also not bashing them for their mistakes. How do I balance these two extremes? Ethics and personal morals.
Getting The Printers
To start, I need to get a printer to review. In every case, whether I am approached or I approach them, I ensure all printer manufacturers agree to have no influence over the review. They cannot see the review until it is published, along with everyone else.
Every company and I agree that I will receive a 3D printer solely for the purposes of a review. The only time I contact the manufacturer between the agreement and letting them know it’s done is if there are any issues or complications. For example, I reached out to Peopoly to get help diagnosing a failed linear motor on the Y axis. For the Prusa CORE One, I asked to get a textured PEI sheet so I could test TPU without ripping apart the smooth PEI sheet.
The Testing
In my testing, I try to keep all the reviews as consistent as possible. I test tolerances, accuracy, quality, speed, and noise level. I also discuss price and repairability. I try to offer a perspective that aligns with not just a hobbyist, but a small business or even a large business. I want to convey the possibilities of having a given printer (let’s call it X) in a small print farm or a support role for your business.
Writing The Article
I write all my notes about each machine’s performance, advertised capabilities, and realistic capabilities. I then take these notes and condense them into paragraphs, which I have an AI, like Gemini or Grok, review and suggest grammatical improvements. AI doesn’t ever change what I have to say or create anything new. I use it only for grammar and punctuation.
Article Review and Publication
Once I have an article ready to go, I upload it as a draft, and several editors can review it and act like an AI, provide me with tips and suggestions, and submit my draft to be published at a future date. Once the article is published, I email the article link to the manufacturer of the printer and that is it. I have been asked many times to remove the article or to make changes. I have not and will not make any changes or remove any article that I am asked to change or remove. The only changes that I do consider are if any spelling errors or typos are caught. Otherwise, all opinions are mine and mine alone and stay.
All images courtesy of Orville Wright.
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Stay up-to-date on all the latest news from the 3D printing industry and receive information and offers from third party vendors.
Print Services
Upload your 3D Models and get them printed quickly and efficiently.
You May Also Like
The Market and Industry Potential of Multi-Material 3D and 4D Printing in Additive Electronics
Additive manufacturing leverages computer-based software to create components for products by depositing either dielectric or conductive materials, layer by layer, into different geometric shapes. Since its birth in the 1980s,...
3DPOD 262: Bio-inspired Design for AM with Dhruv Bhate, Arizona State University
Dhruv Bhate is an associate professor at Arizona State University. There, he looks at structures, materials, and design. Previously, he worked at PADT as well as in the semiconductor and...
3DPOD 261: Tooling and Cooling for AM with Jason Murphy, NXC MFG
Jason Murphy´s NXC MFG (Next Chapter Manufacturing) is not a generalist service; instead, the company specializes in making tooling. Using LPBF and binder jet, the company produces some of the...
3DPOD 260: John Hart on VulcanForms, MIT, Desktop Metal and More
John Hart is a Professor at MIT; he´s also the director of the Laboratory for Manufacturing and Productivity as well as the director of the Center for Advanced Production Technologies....