MIT Researchers Use AI to Optimize Stiffness and Toughness Balance in 3D Printed Parts

Share this Article

In January, researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s (MIT’s) Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) published a study in the journal Science Advances, which details an algorithm they developed for automating material qualification of 3D printed parts. The specific aim of the project is encapsulated in the study’s title, “Computational Discovery of Microstructured Composites with Optimal Stiffness-Toughness Trade-Offs”:

As the journal article’s introduction notes, “Stiffness — the ability to resist deformation in response to an applied force, and toughness — the ability to resist cracks, are two quintessential properties in most engineering materials, since these materials must resist non-recoverable deformation and prevent catastrophic failure under external loading in structural applications. Unfortunately, stiffness and toughness are often mutually exclusive because, in order to be tough, a material must be ductile enough to tolerate long cracks and absorb more energy before fracturing. Although a few exceptions have been discovered among microstructured composites through trial-and-error approaches or biomimcry, there is no systematic way to design and fabricate such materials.”

Stratasys Object 260 Connex 3D printer. Image courtesy of Stratasys

Thus, the CSAIL team’s goal wasn’t so much to find the optimal equilibrium between stiffness and toughness for a given material, but rather to create an automated process for discovering that equilibrium. Using a Stratasys Objet 260 Connex multi-material 3D printer, the researchers fabricated test objects from two different acrylic-based materials, combining the feedstocks into composites with different ratios of the base materials.

In the next phase of the project, the team subjected the materials — printed into objects “roughly the size of a smartphone but slimmer” — to tensile testing on an Instron 5984 Universal Testing Machine (UTM). The results from those tests were used to inform a finite element method (FEM)-based simulation, with the combined results of real-world and virtual testing then fed into the algorithm the researchers developed, called “Neural-Network Accelerated Multi-Objective Optimization” (NMO).

As the paper notes, “In early iterations, the predictor is very inaccurate due to limited training data. …Nonetheless, as the algorithm proceeds the predictor becomes more accurate by virtue of accumulating training data from the simulator.” The team concluded that a method incorporating three qualitatively different datasets gradually brought the simulation closer to reality, a process which was greatly accelerated by the use of machine learning. The researchers expect that the versatility of the underlying approach should allow the study’s results to be applied in many areas outside the scope of the original experiment:

One of the study’s lead researchers, MIT CSAIL PhD student Beichen Li, told MIT News, “Composite design and fabrication is fundamental to engineering. The implications of our work will hopefully extend far beyond the realm of solid mechanics. Our methodology provides a blueprint for a computational design that can be adapted to diverse fields such as polymer chemistry, fluid dynamics, meteorology, and even robotics. This evolutionary algorithm, accelerated by neural networks, guides our exploration, allowing us to find the best-performing samples efficiently.”

Image courtesy of Science Advances

The researchers rightly point out in the journal article that one of the most crucial results of the study is the demonstration that an AI-based approach may enable non-experts to effectively and quickly characterize and qualify materials. It is easy to imagine organizations like America Makes testing the approach to simultaneously enhance both material qualification and workforce development.

It is also easy to see how a company like Inkbit, with its specialization in deploying machine vision for additive manufacturing (AM) optimization, emerged out of the CSAIL. Inkbit’s multi-material, precision engineering approach seems like an ideal platform for future research into the NMO.

Finally, the most intriguing aspect to the study may be its potential to take the same method and incorporate other parameters — most namely, cost. Markforged, for instance, just released a product called Performance Advisor, which relies on a physics-based approach to recommend optimized balances between part strength and cost. In any case, the increasing exploration into physics-based approaches for AM quality control suggests that this is more than just a trend, and will likely become more and more integral to the industry’s overall process of materials development.

Share this Article

Recent News

3D Printing News Briefs, July 13, 2024: Metal 3D Printer, AFWERX Award, & More

3D Printing Markets Grows 8% Year over Year


3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns

You May Also Like

Vision Miner Acquires its 3D Printer Supplier AddWise

Vision Miner, a provider of industrial 3D printing solutions, has announced the acquisition of AddWise, a manufacturer of 3D printers and related products, in a deal valued that the companies...

“Auto Repair Needs 3D Printing” – Harold Sears Weighs in on Auto Additive’s Launch

Despite the automotive sector’s long-time adoption of additive manufacturing (AM), the use of the technology for end parts in consumer vehicles is only just now beginning to take off. And,...


Formlabs Buys Nascent SLS 3D Printer Competitor Micronics

Formlabs, maker of accessible yet professional 3D printers, has acquired Micronics, which recently debuted with a claim of making a $2,999 3D printer. I, for one, was pretty incredulous about...

The Producers: HP’s President of 3D Printing Savi Baveja Explains How the Company is Addressing Scalability

HP (NSYE: HPQ) and the additive manufacturing (AM) industry in the US need each other. In the long run, I believe that what’s good for one will be good for...