One of the greatest benefits that 3D printing can offer in the fabrication of high-performance parts is speed. Users around the world continue to improve on this, reveling in both the ability to innovate like never before—as well as the rewards of cutting out the middlemen in manufacturing and tossing aside the reliance on traditional technology. This means that parts can be made exponentially faster. Conventional technology has not gone by the wayside whatsoever though and may be used with 3D printing or other hybrid technologies.
Companies like Denmark’s Addifab have been hailed for new methods like freeform injection molding (FIM), printing cavity inserts with resin, and then filling them with materials like PEEK, metal, and more. Meanwhile, other startups like Tennessee-based Collider have created the hybrid Orchid 3D printer for a similar process called Programmable Tooling. With digital light processing (DLP), they create molds that are then filled with material cartridges. Afterward, the shells and pipes are dissolved, leaving a clean, functional part behind.
Now, UMass Lowell researchers claim to have created a new 3D injection technology, detailed in “Injection printing: additive molding via shell material extrusion and filling.” With David Kazmer, a plastics engineering professor leading the project, the researchers set out to “mitigate the curse of dimensionality that plagues additive manufacturing” by using extrusion-based 3D printing with fine resolution to fill molds at high flow rates.
Ultimately, the goal is to fabricate more durable parts for applications like prosthetics and medical devices, as well as improving strength in parts for the aeronautics and automobile industry. The team has been working on the novel hybrid technology for 18 months, filling empty 3D printed molds with molten material. In comparison with conventional methods, they report an increase in speed that is three times faster.
“The invention greatly improves the quality of the parts produced, making them fully dense with few cracks or voids, so they are much stronger. For technical applications, this is game-changing,” said Kazmer in discussing the evaluation of research samples. “The new process is also cost-effective because it can be used in existing 3D printers, with only new software to program the machine needed.”
Samples were printed with ABS and evaluated in terms of tensile properties and impact resistance. Austin Colon, a UMass Lowell Ph.D. candidate in plastics engineering, teamed up with Kazmer for testing of the research specimens.
There were considerable improvements as stiffness, strength, and strain were increased respectively by 21%, 47%, and 35%. Limitations due to the 3D printer itself, mainly in melting capacity, were noted; however, the researchers concluded that injection printing has proven to be applicable and accessible for refining the quality of parts and speed in production.
It appears that the researcher’s process is more similar to Collider’s technology, in that printing and injection molding occur within the same printing procedure. This is in contrast to AddiFab, which performs injection molding separately using conventional injection molding systems once the shell has been printed. However, both Collider and AddiFab rely on digital light processing (DLP) to produce their shells, while this research describes a fused filament fabrication (FFF) process.
On the one hand, this may mean the potential to convert existing FFF printers into injection printing machines. On the other, DLP is known for much higher resolution prints and faster printing overall. Regardless of the trade offs, all of these methods would substantially increase the material possibilities for polymer 3D printing given the vast portfolio of injection molding materials already on the market. These are plastics most manufacturers are already comfortable with and would be used in a mass production scenario, meaning that these injection printing technologies could be used to more accurately prototype end parts than is possible with existing printing materials.
The researchers have filed a patent on the technology. Find out more by downloading the research here.[Source / Images: Phys.Org]
You May Also Like
3D Systems Finalizes Sale of On-Demand Business, Will Operate as Quickparts
Pioneering additive manufacturing solutions provider 3D Systems finalized the $82 million deal for the sale of its on-demand 3D printing and custom manufacturing business. The rebranded company will operate as...
3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: September 19, 2021
We’ve got another busy week of webinars and events to tell you about! Topics in this week’s roundup run the gamut from 3D digital textures and FDM 3D printing potential...
3D Printing News Briefs, September 18, 2021: Business, Materials, & More
We’re filling up the front of today’s 3D Printing News Briefs with plenty of business, as one company celebrates an anniversary and two others welcome new executives to their ranks....
3D Printing Service Hubs Appoints New CEO, Alex Cappy
Changes are taking place at Hubs since it was acquired by manufacturing service provider Protolabs (Nasdaq: PRLB). Not only has the subsidiary removed the “3D” from its name, but it...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.