Seeking solutions for ‘buckling’ in wall structures and failure in parts, Chalmers University of Technology PhD researcher Bharet Mehta turned to additive manufacturing processes for improved performance in production. Mehta recently presented a thesis, “Enhanced performance of magnetic floating devices enabled through metal additive manufacturing,” to Chalmers.
The author focuses on creating a family of floating devices, using 316L stainless steel. With thin shells of sub-millimeter thickness welded together, the metallic floating structures are meant to resist buckling activity. Mehta explains that the ultimate goal of the study was to create stronger parts that are still light in weight, with the thesis focusing only on laser-based powder bed fusion (LPBF).
AM processes were considered beneficial due to reduction of parts during production and less assembly, greater accuracy and less post-processing, flexibility in design, rigidity in materials, and customization. Mehta listed typical limitations: higher surface roughness, few materials available, increased manufacturing times, and lack of consistency in terms of quality.
During experimentation, the addition of stiffeners enhanced performance of the part. This was especially effective when high buckling strength or less weight was required.
While not all the details regarding the sample part were disclosed, Mehta did describe it as a ‘thin shell cylindrical section which is closed by welding and is supported by some ring stiffeners to make it bear the hydrostatic loads.’
“As a modification to the original part, a slight modification was done based on ANSYS simulation results, producing a simulation-based design to thicken the rings,” said Mehta. “The same was done to avoid the failure at rings and change the load path, in order to get a skin type buckling failure.”
Another customized design was also fabricated but with thicker rings and bigger holes in the rings, allowing for similar weight, and improvement in terms of buckling.
“As discussed in theory, linear buckling of the part was not the correct representation to what would actually happen when the part fails. This is because hydrostatic buckling represents a plastic failure and the collapse pressure is used to define the maximum loads for the part. Hence, a sturdier design, which incorporated non-linearity, was planned to be tested and prove the design’s performance in real life. Several factors were found to affect the performance while switching to AM, and experimental setups were defined accordingly,” explained Mehta.
Prints were performed at AMEXCI, Sweden, on an EOS M290, and at ABB Corporate on the ReaLizer SLM 50.
“The simulation results showed about 3 times improvement in specific buckling strength in one of the designs – isogrid stiffened AM part with hollow rings, as can be seen in table 6.1 [below]. The stress levels shown were well below the ultimate strength of the material, which means that the idea might work. However, this design concept has to be proven experimentally,” stated Mehta in conclusion.
“These floating devices take modularity to the next level, by giving an opportunity for optimization of lattice based stiffeners and hollow rings to define ‘new materials.’ Hence, strength to weight ratios can be adjusted to become as high as aluminum or as low as some plastics.”
Improvements in metal 3D printing are continually being made by researchers looking into strengthening mechanical properties, investigating the effects of porosity, and testing metal powders and other materials. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Stay up-to-date on all the latest news from the 3D printing industry and recieve information and offers from thrid party vendors.
You May Also Like
3D Printing News Briefs, May 18, 2022: Xerox, Full-Color Materials, & More
In 3D Printing News Briefs today, we’re starting off with metal, as RIT and Xerox are partnering to advance metal AM with a new system installation. Moving on, Stratasys has...
3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: May 15, 2022
This is a big week in the additive manufacturing industry—RAPID + TCT is here! But that’s not the only event in town; there will also be webinars on topics like...
Stratasys Advances Applications with New Materials, Software, and Composite 3D Printers
In the last two months, Stratasys Ltd. (NASDAQ: SSYS) has qualified its Antero 840CN03 filament for 3D printed aerospace applications, published its first Sustainability Report, announced the latest two members of its...
Buying the Death Star: Ultimaker Merges with MakerBot. Takes Stratasys Investment
When I used to work at Ultimaker, Makerbot was the enemy. They were closed, corporate, didn’t care about customers and didn’t care about values and open hardware. We did everything...