Ahmed Elkaseer, Stella Schneider, and Steffen G. Scholz delve further into the effects of parameters and settings on the quality of parts, releasing the details from their recent study in ‘Experiment-Based Process Modeling and Optimization for High-Quality and Resource-Efficient FFF 3D Printing.’
Reminding us that 3D printing was originally designed for rapid prototyping, centered around the work of engineers, the authors point out that users around the world are now also beginning to rely on such technology for ‘customized mass production of functional parts,’ due to a sufficient evolution of the processes; however, there is still much to be learned and improved. This is especially true as users continue to innovate within so many different applications, from automotive to aerospace to construction, and so much more.
This study focuses on FDM (FFF, Material Extrusion) 3D printing as the authors examine what is accurately depicted as ‘a large number of individually adjustable printing parameters,’ and why defects and problems so often occur. Noting that PLA is a popular material in 3D printing, enjoyed due to its more environmentally friendly nature and ease in use, the authors analyzed the following on a test structure:
- Infill percentage
- Layer thickness
- Printing speed
- Printing temperature
- Surface inclination angle
Simplify3D was used as slicing software, with test samples 3D printed on the Zmorph 2.0 SX.
The authors reported that for this study, printing parameters remained the same for all experiments.
Three samples were 3D printed, allowing the researchers to average the process responses, measure the importance of the process responses, evaluate accuracy, and calculate percentage errors.
“For the surface roughness, Ra, the stylus-type profilometer MarSurf GD 26 was used,” stated the authors. “A sample length of 4 mm was traversed by the stylus. For each run, the roughness at the concerning inclination angle was measured at three samples and the average was calculated.”
The effects of the parameters used were analyzed in relation to:
- Surface roughness
- Dimensional accuracy
- Energy consumption
“Considering all the parameters, dimensional accuracy is mainly influenced by layer thickness and printing speed, whereas the surface roughness depends on surface inclination angle and on layer thickness. Energy consumption and productivity are primarily affected by printing speed and layer thickness. Although interactions between printing parameters can be beneficial for the required outcome, they can also hamper the process,” concluded the researchers.
“Generally, it is apparent that layer thickness and printing speed dominate the other parameters in their importance and usually define the outcome of the printing process. However, on the other hand, there will be a trade-off between layer thickness and printing speed to ensure part quality and resource usage, which must be resolved in order to obtain high-quality and resource-efficient built parts.”
What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.[Source / Images: ‘Experiment-Based Process Modeling and Optimization for High-Quality and Resource-Efficient FFF 3D Printing’]
You May Also Like
3D Printing Functionally Graded Materials Gets an F
An exciting and potentially revolutionary slow-burn development in 3D printing is that of gradient materials (also called Functionally Graded Materials, or FGMs). With FGMs, we can mix materials in such...
BMF Targets Industrial Microscale Production with microArch S240 3D Printer
Founded in 2016, Boston Micro Fabrication (BMF) specializes in precision 3D printing on the microscale with its patented Projection Micro Stereolithography (PµSL) technology. The startup is a spin-out of MIT,...
WASP Introduces Latest PEEK 3D Printer, the Delta WASP 4070 TECH
At formnext 2019, Italian company WASP (World’s Advanced Saving Project) introduced its Delta WASP 2040 TECH system, which can 3D print PEEK (polyetheretherketone) pellets. Now, the next printer in this line...
STACKER Successfully Funds Industrial Office F1 3D Printer on Kickstarter
3D printer Kickstarter campaigns don’t all get it right, but when it comes to crowdfunding, industrial-grade 3D printer provider STACKER seems to know what it’s doing. The Minnesota-based company just...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.