AMR Software
AMR Data Centers

Eindhoven University of Technology: Thesis Student Studies Layer Deposition Issues in 3D Printing

Share this Article

Niek Groot takes on the topic of layer deposition in printing with resin, detailing his findings in ‘The influence of coater velocity on layer deposition in the 3D-printing process,’ a thesis submitted to Eindhoven University of Technology. With a focus on vat photopolymerization, the author investigates challenges that arise during layer deposition.

A schematic view of the process of layer deposition in which the velocity profile can be seen in between the coater blade and the bottom plate

Printing ceramics is becoming increasingly more popular with users around the globe, as they streamline techniques, experiment with new materials and composites, and create new molds and templates. Groot points out though that during printing, small deformations may occur. If this happens multiple times, leaving deformations stacked on top of each other throughout the 3D printed layers, there may be imperfections that threaten the integrity of the overall product.

An overview of the velocity profile beneath the coater and resin thickness depending on Π with courtesy to [3].

Groot used a Lepus Next Gen vat photopolymerization machine to experiment with parameters and the resulting effects on layers.

“The main parameters which are investigated are the coater height above the bottom plate and the coater velocity,” explains Groot, seeking to find setting adjustments that control flow and resin layers.

Layer adhesion is an issue many users must deal with, but when deformations are persistent throughout numerous layers there is greater concern due to the potential for structural failure and serious imperfections in shape.

“When looking at the effect of velocity on the height profiles for 100 µm, almost no difference can be seen when altering the coater velocity. However, when looking at the influence of the coater velocity on the height profile in case of a coater height of 150 µm and 200 µm, one can see a small decrease in the height profile for a faster coater velocity,” stated the author.

A schematic view of a laser triangulation sensor.

A schematic representation of chromatic aberration, where A is a polychromatic light source and B,G and R are the focal points of red, blue and green light. With courtesy to [2].

Measuring of height in layers was critical in this study, as Groot considered a couple of different sensors to be used: the laser triangulation sensor (information derived from triangles) and the confocal chromatic sensor (seeking aberrations in optics). Comparisons were made between the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model and results compiled during experimentation.

A schematic representation of the experimental setup which was used. The
confocal chromatic sensor, coater and resin injector are all mounted to the same movable stage (not to scale).

A picture of the Lepus Next Gen, where one can see the bottom plate and the movable stage containing the confocal chromatic sensor, coater and the resin injector. (Image: AMSYSTEMS)

“The results gathered by the Comsol model are very logical. The model resulted in a resin layer of exactly half the coater height above the bottom plate. This result is predicted by formula (8). This is also the case for most of the gathered data. Therefore, the model is in good accordance with the experimental data gathered,” concluded the researcher.

“As one can see, most results found during this thesis are not perfect. First, it can be clearly seen that the measurements for a coater height of 100µm, which can be found in Appendix B, are all negative. This is of course very unrealistic. Furthermore, it can be noticed that every measurement fluctuates more than what was expected. Sometimes these fluctuations were up to 50 µm. At first sight 50 µm does not seem a lot, however if it is stated that the thickest layer is 200 µm it can be easily seen that 50 µm is a very large fluctuation in this case.”

What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

[Source / Images: ‘The influence of coater velocity on layer deposition in the 3D-printing process’]


Share this Article


Recent News

OSSTEC’s Bone-Like 3D Printed Implants Get £2.5M to Target US Market

3DPOD 253: Jacob Nuechterlein, Part 2: Fortius Metals, and a Metal AM Materials Masterclass



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

3DPOD 252: What’s Really Happening in Bioprinting, with Mark Skylar-Scott, Stanford University

Mark Skylar-Scott is an experienced bioprinting researcher now working at one of the foremost bioprinting labs in the world at Stanford University. We talk about inexpensive desktop bioprinters and their...

Featured

Printing Money Episode 28: Recent M&A and More with Joris Peels, 3DPrint.com

Welcome to Episode 28 of Printing Money.  For this one Danny is joined by our own, Joris Peels (Executive Editor, 3DPrint.com). This crossover-pod is indeed quite meta-level but it’s not...

3DPOD 251: 3D Printing for Football Helmets with Kodiak Brush, LIGHT Helmets

Kodiak Brush grew up playing football before working on crash testing. Sometimes someone’s career can seem like it is inexorably building up to one goal. And with Kodiak now making...

3DPOD 250: Dieter Schwarze, Nikon SLM Solutions

Dieter Schwarze is a true 3D printing icon. Here we get the twisting, arduous tale of Dieter’s journey into additive. Starting with inkjet, SLA and lots of other technologies, Dieter´s...