Researchers from China assess the further potential for the smartphone in medical applications, outlining their findings in ‘Evaluating phone camera and cloud service-based 3D imaging and printing of human bones for anatomical education.’
Historically, training on real bodies is one of the best ways for medical students to learn—but cadavers are often not available globally. To make up for that, as technology has progressed, so have a wide range of simulation programs and visual aids. Today, 3D printed medical models and an array of devices are able to offer comprehensive benefits for diagnosing, treating, educating patients, planning for surgeries, and more. Medical students (as well as experienced surgeons) can also benefit enormously from models which may feature tumors about to be operated on in new or rarely performed procedures.
“The primary advantage of 3D printing lies in its ability to create graspable shapes or geometric features of high complexity, overcoming the limitations brought about using flat screens for the visualization of 3D imaging data. Moreover, compared with embalmed cadaveric specimens, 3D printed models are more wear-resistant, easier to clean and store, and, essentially, environmentally green,” state the researchers.
While many industries are benefiting from 3D printing, the impacts are undeniably vast within the medical arena, as anatomical models allow for training and planning, and offer an ‘increasingly significant role’ in developing countries like India.
“In effect, reports indicate that 3D printing helps to improve the effectiveness of teaching and that students learning with 3D printed models performed even better in tests than those learning with real specimens,” stated the researchers.
There are still challenges and limitations in terms of 3D printing as the technology continues to evolve within the medical field; however, education and knowledge of special equipment has been a specific concern. The researchers were motivated in this study to offer technology that is easy to use via phone-based 3D imaging, requiring a basic 3D printer to fabricate models.
The following sample bones were used for imaging: femur, rib, cervical vertebra, and skull. Specimens were photographed repeatedly while spinning on a turntable.
“During our testing, the photographer held the phone and captured the images with one hand and rotated the turntable with the other hand after each shot. Two rounds of photography were carried out on different horizontal planes,” explained the researchers.
Each specimen was photographed 80-100 times, with the photos being uploaded to Get3D and the converted files sent to an online 3D printing service in China. The researchers stated that the costs of the 3D printed femur, rib, cervical vertebra, and skull were USD $20.27, $3.96, $1.13, and $35.40, respectively.
Upon evaluation, the researchers confirmed that their method offered a ‘fairly high precision’ in digital and 3D printed models.
“The most noteworthy feature of the proposed workflow is that it works without scanners or the CT/MRI dataset, thus enabling a broader range of 3D printing technology for educational applications,” stated the authors.
The models offered a good display of anatomical features; for example, the nutrient foramina on the femur was ‘observed easily.’ This was noted in comparison to previous research where an FDM 3D printer using ABS rendered a similar femur sample to be invisible in the area of the nutrient foramina. For this study, SLA was chosen, with Somos Imagine 8000—a rigid material that is tough, dense, and easy to clean.
“The 3D printed models created using the photogrammetry method demonstrate only the external features of the bone specimens; the inner structures are invisible. Human specimens also have this limitation. To display the different anatomical landmarks on the interior of the skull, three or four differently dissected specimens must be used. The same strategy can be applied while creating 3D printed models that display different anatomical structures—differently dissected or sliced specimens are chosen as the resources to be put through photogrammetry,” explained the researchers in their final discussion.
“The photogrammetric digitization workflow adapted in the present study demonstrates fairly high precision with relatively low cost and fewer equipment requirements. This workflow is expected to be used in morphological/anatomical science education, particularly in institutions and schools with limited funds or in certain field research projects involving the fast acquisition of 3D digital data on human/animal bone specimens or on other remains.”
What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.[Source / Images: ‘Evaluating phone camera and cloud service-based 3D imaging and printing of human bones for anatomical education’]
You May Also Like
3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: September 12, 2021
Buckle your seatbelts, it’s going to be a busy week of webinars and events, both virtual and in-person! RAPID + TCT and FABTECH will both be held in-person this week...
Sixth Bioprinting Acquisition in One Year from Cellink Parent Company BICO
Pioneering bioprinting firm Cellink, now part of a larger company rebranded as BICO (short for bioconvergence), has already been making quite a name for itself and is preparing to capture...
Complete Tumor 3D Printed to Facilitate Faster Treatment Prediction
There are more than 120 different types of brain tumors, many of which are cancerous, but the deadliest, and sadly most common, is the aggressive, fast-growing glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), a...
3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: August 15th, 2021
From convincing your professor they need a 3D printer and the future of static mixers to biomaterials and bioprinting, we’ve got another week of webinars and events to tell you...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.