Binder Jet 3D Printing: Studying Print Speed & Effects on Surface Roughness & Density

Share this Article

International researchers study different features that affect binder jetting, outlining their findings in the recently published ‘The Effect of Print Speed on Surface Roughness and Density Uniformity of Parts Produced Using Binder Jet 3D Printing.’ Binder jetting continues to be popular with industrial users because it is fast; however, that does not mean prints come out perfect, leaving the scientists here to work on methods for improving the overall outcomes of prototypes and parts.

Fabrication of a binder jetting part relies on:

  • Powder dispensing
  • Powder spreading
  • Binder dispensing
  • Binder drying

“The printing time (the time it takes to dispense binder droplets) can be decreased by either increasing the number of printing modules in the machine itself, or by increasing the speed at which the printhead traverses across the bed. However, increasing the printhead traverse speed can negatively affect the feature resolution and dimensional accuracy.”

Consistency is one of the most critical elements to production, and especially in manufacturing parts with close tolerances, however, the following issues can cause interruption to a good flow rate and consistency:

  • Machine wear
  • Machine cleanliness
  • The number of times powder is recycled
  • Humidity in the air

Schematic of the advanced compaction technology used during the powder spreading process.

For this study, the researchers investigated how powder speed will affect density of green body parts, long with surface roughness during sintering. They also explored how layer thickness and droplet size affect surface roughness. The research team 3D printed on an ExOne Innovent+ binder jet printer using the ExOne solvent binder at 70% saturation.

The build layout of each trial as shown in the Innovent+ software.

Five different coupon samples were sintered, measured, and weighed. Surface roughness was then measured five times.

a) Schematic of a coupon being tested 5 times in various positions across the surface of the coupon and b) schematic of the stylus traverse direction against layer thickness of angled coupons.

There were six printing trials in all, with each one of them demonstrating that increase of powder spread result in a density increase. Slow spreading speeds allowed for the greatest consistency in powder packing density.

“Although the coupons with the 50 μm layer thickness have a lower average green density than the 30 μm layer thickness, the coupons were able to sinter to over 98% dense,” stated the researchers. “When evaluating the effect coupon angle has on green density, the average density decreases with increased coupon angle.

“The surface roughness (Ra) typically increases with faster spreading speeds and increased coupon orientation angle,” concluded the researchers. “The smallest average surface roughness value (Ra) was found to be 4.05 μm with the 50 μm layer thickness and 30 pLa printhead on a flat surface with a spread speed of 3 mm/sec. The largest average roughness (Ra) was found to be 9.78 μm with the 50 μm layer thickness and 30 pL printhead on a 22.5° coupon with a 125 mm/sec spread speed.”

As researchers worldwide continue to study binder jet 3D printing, from use with materials like aluminum alloys to experimental powders, ceramic 3D printing, and more. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

The average green density profile for each Trial in respect to coupon print angle.

[Source / Images: ‘The Effect of Print Speed on Surface Roughness and Density Uniformity of Parts Produced Using Binder Jet 3D Printing’]

Share this Article


Recent News

Copper3D Antimicrobial Filament Device Attempts To Reduce HIV Transmission From Breastfeeding

PERI Group to 3D Print Walls of Small Home Each Day at Bautec Construction Exhibit



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

3D Printing Foam Concrete: Investigating Production Techniques

In the recently published ‘Investigations on the foam concrete production techniques suitable for 3D printing with foam concrete,’ authors V. Markin, G. Sahmenko, V.N. Nerella, M. Nather, and V. Mechtcherine...

TU Dresden: CONPrint3D for Monolithic 3D Printing in Construction

Researchers from the Technische Universität Dresden have been exploring challenges within the construction industry. In their recently published paper, ‘Large-scale digital concrete construction – CONPrint3D concept for on-site, monolithic 3D...

Truth in 3D Printed Construction? “Nobody 3D Printed an Entire Building”

At 3DPrint.com, we’ve always been very skeptical about the goings-on in 3D printed construction. A lot of houses have been 3D printed in 24 hours, each time while conveniently forgetting...

Researchers Assess the Use of 3D Printing Geo-Polymer Concrete

In the recently published ‘Life Cycle Assessment of 3D Printing Geo-polymer Concrete: An Ex-ante Study,’ authors Yue Yao, Mingming Hu, Francesco Di Maio, and Stefano Cucurachi examine the development of...


Shop

View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.


Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our 3DPrint.com.

You have Successfully Subscribed!