Evaluating the Performance of 3D Printed Foot Orthoses for People with Flat Feet

Share this Article

People with conditions such as flat feet often turn to custom foot orthoses (FOs), which can be fabricated using 3D printing and scanning technologies at a reduced cost in less time. A team of researchers from Taiwan recently conducted a study, titled “Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses,” in order to evaluate the use of 3D printed FOs by people with flat feet.

“The purposes of this study were to fabricate FOs using low-cost 3D printing techniques and evaluate the mechanical properties and biomechanical effects of the 3D-printed FOs in individuals with flexible flatfoot,” the researchers wrote.

Figure 1: Fabrication of the 3D printed FOs. (c) Extraction of the FO shape from the foot model. (d) Solid FO model imported into Cura to be sliced and output as G-Code.

They 3D printed 18 FO samples, at orientations of 0°, 45°, and 90°, and subjected them to human motion analysis, with 12 flatfooted individuals, as well as mechanical testing to determine their maximum compressive load and stiffness.

The researchers 3D scanned the participants’ feet, and exported the result as an STL file, which was edited with Autodesk Meshmixer software and 3D printed out of PLA filament on an Infinity X1 FDM 3D printer. The build parameters of the FOs were defined using Ultimaker Cura 3.3 software.

“Because no standard tests for FOs exist, we designed a procedure to test the stiffness of the FOs,” the researchers explained. “A rectangular fixture measuring was placed on the lateral side of each FO.”

Then, six 3D printed FOs for each build orientation were put through dynamic compression, and the team collected displacement and reaction force data. An ANOVA, or one-way analysis of variance, test, and a post hoc Tukey’s test, were also completed in order to compare the maximum compressive load and stiffness of the FOs.

(e) FO 3D printed using an Infinity X1 3D printer. (f) Top view and (g) rear view of the 3D printed FO.

“The executed compressive tests revealed that the 45° and 90° build orientations engendered similar load and displacement behaviors in the FOs when the displacement was less than 5 mm,” they wrote. “The ANOVA revealed differences between groups. The Tukey test demonstrated that the maximum load in the FOs fabricated using the 45° build orientation ( N) was significantly greater than those in the FOs fabricated using the 90° ( N) and 0° ( N) build orientations.”

The participants were also subjected to a motion capture experiment, where both kinematic and kinetic data were collected by an eight-camera 3D Vicon motion analysis system. They had to “perform five trials of level walking at a self-selected speed” wearing standard shoes, and then the shoes embedded with 3D printed FOs.

The team again performed an ANOVA test to compare mechanical parameters of the FOs from each of the three build orientations; a paired-sample test was also conducted in order to compare biomechanical variables from the motion capture tests.

“The results indicated that the 45° build orientation produced the strongest FOs. In addition, the maximum ankle evertor and external rotator moments under the Shoe+FO condition were significantly reduced by 35% and 16%, respectively, but the maximum ankle plantar flexor moments increased by 3%, compared with the Shoe condition. No significant difference in ground reaction force was observed between the two conditions,” the researchers wrote. “This study demonstrated that 3D-printed FOs could alter the ankle joint moments during gait.

“We can conclude that the low-cost 3D printing technology has the capability of fabricating custom FOs with sufficient support to correct foot abnormalities. We provide evidence that such FOs engender biomechanical changes and positively influence individuals with flexible flatfoot.”

Co-authors of the paper were Kuang-Wei LinChia-Jung HuWen-Wen YangLi-Wei ChouShun-Hwa WeiChen-Sheng Chen, and Pi-Chang Sun.

What do you think about this news? Discuss this story and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts in the Facebook comments below. 

Share this Article


Recent News

Bioprinting Biocompatible Hydrogels from Cellulose Inks

Make:able Challenge: Design & 3D Print Assistive Technology for the Disabled



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D printed automobiles

3D Printed Food


You May Also Like

US Army Brings Supersonic LightSPEE3D Metal 3D Printer to Rock Island Arsenal

Australian company SPEE3D works hard to make metal additive manufacturing easier, and faster, for customers through its patented supersonic 3D deposition (SP3D) technology, which utilizes cold spray additive manufacturing (CSAM),...

3D Printing News Briefs, August 5, 2020: Titan Robotics & Braskem, 3DPRINTUK

Today’s 3D Printing News Briefs is about materials and a 3D printed version of a real building. Titan Robotics and Braskem are partnering up to offer new solutions in 3D...

QuesTek Innovations Wins US Air Force-America Makes 3D Printing Challenge

QuesTek Innovations has won the Macroscale Structure-to-Properties Predictions portion of an intensive four-part AFRL AM Modeling Challenge Series sponsored by the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) and America Makes. Founded in 2012,...

IDAM’s Automotive 3D Printing Production Lines Make Progress with BMW, GKN and More

Since the inception of the Industrialization and Digitalization of Additive Manufacturing (IDAM) project in March 2019, progress has been made: partners have been creating the promised digitalized AM pilot lines,...


Shop

View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.