In ‘The revolution will be open-source: how 3D bioprinting can change 3D cell culture,’ authors Robert D. Bruno, John Reid, and Patrick C. Sachs explore the revolutionary aspect of 3D scaffolds in bioprinting, with tissue engineering spanning such a wide range in medicine today.
While 3D printing is impacting nearly every industry around the globe it would seem, within the medical realm, the technology is also touching virtually every aspect from breast cancer research to the dental industry.
For most researchers, common types of substrates used in tissue engineering are membrane rich extracellular matrix (ECM) and collagen extracted from rattails.
“The processes of 3D culture in these two substrates has remained unchanged for nearly half a century: cells are either mixed with unpolymerized matrix to disperse them randomly throughout the substrate upon polymerization or overlaid randomly on top of a preformed hydrogel. While effective in generating organoid/tumoroid structures, the random nature of these processes has many drawbacks that limit the reproducibility and tunability of the experimental design,” explain the authors.
And while one of the greatest aspects in 3D printing today may be the sudden accessibility and affordability of 3D printers (a great example of this would be the ubiquity of such technology in schools around the world, as well as DIY workshops), that has not yet trickled down to bioprinting–with the exception of specialty labs graced with substantial funds to purchase necessary equipment and bionics.
With the inception of this project, the authors developed their own affordable, open access 3D bioprinting system. Meant to be used in scientific applications, the printer is extremely versatile, and adaptable to many different applications—from printing cells to guiding electrodes for direction of electrical pulsing of cells.
“To increase precision and maintain integrity of printed cells, we use pulled glass micropipette syringes as our cell injection ‘printhead,’” state the researchers. “Compared to standard steel needles attached to luer lock syringes, these glass micropipettes have a finer point and reduce sheer force on the cells. Combined, this minimizes disruptions to the cells and allows the hydrogel to seal behind the print. Thus, our system allows for the precise placement of cells, that then self-organize into organoids/tumoroids, making functional structures.”
The researchers have maintained a focus on bioprinting within the realm of mammary organoids, with the potential for growing cells into predictable sizes and shapes.
“The key to the guided growth was the fact that mammary epithelial cells (MCF12a and MCF10a) would preferentially grow towards neighboring prints, forming single contiguous organoids. Using this strategy, we generated large contiguous luminal mammary organoids (> 5mm in length). This is in clear contrast to random culture where the dispersion of cells results in random organoid shape and size, with organoids never forming more than a couple of hundred microns in size,” concluded the researchers.
“Our studies highlight the ease of access and the utility of the technology for basic cell and cancer biology studies. Thus, we hope to lower the bar of entry further by developing easier-to-access solutions, such as ready-built kits, and a graphic user interface (GUI) to simplify the experimental programming. The system offers a potentially revolutionary step forward for 3D culture models of development and cancer.”
Bioprinting is making a huge stamp on the world, as well as the 3D printing realm—a technology that has inspired scientists in laboratories around the world to take on the challenge of tissue engineering.
And while research has already yielded so many positive results, from allowing patients to lead higher quality lives due to innovations like tunable tissue, development of microfluidic techniques, and even tailored skin grafts, the true goal—the ultimate miracle of 3D printing will be that of a human organ.
Once scientists can overcome that hurdle, many patients will rejoice in knowing that they may be able to bypass long-term waiting lists for organs made from their own cells.
What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.[Source / Images: ‘The revolution will be open-source: how 3D bioprinting can change 3D cell culture’]
You May Also Like
Interview with Scott Sevcik, VP Aerospace Stratasys, on 3D Printing for Aviation and Space
Out of all the possible industries that are deploying more 3D printers, aerospace is probably the most exciting. By reducing the weight of aircraft components, by iterating more, by integrating...
Researchers Use Autodesk Ember 3D Printer to Characterize 3D Printed Lenses
In the recently published ‘Characterization of 3D printed lenses and diffraction gratings made by DLP additive manufacturing,’ international researchers studied digital fabrication of optical parts using DLP 3D printing. Examining...
3D Printing in Dental Prosthetics: The Effects of Parameters on Fit & Gap
In the recently published ‘Effects of Printing Parameters on the Fit of Implant-Supported 3D Printing Resin Prosthetics,” authors Gang-Seok Park, Seong-Kyun Kim, Seong-Joo Heo, Jai-Young Koak, and Deog-Gyu Seo delve...
Longer3D Launches the Orange 10, Affordable SLA 3D Printer
3D printer manufacturer Longer3D has launched a highly competitive resin printer, the Longer Orange 10, an affordable SLA 3D printer with performance and specs that position it competitively in its...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.