Thermoplastic Fiber Reinforced Composite Materials in 4D Printing

Share this Article

In ‘Thermoplastic Fiber Reinforced Composite Material Characterization and Precise Finite Element Analysis for 4D Printing,’ researchers are delving further into the next dimension. And while the 3D realm is barely tapped in so many ways, taking it to the next level offers greater functionality for many scientists, engineers, designers, and innovative users curious about shape-changing materials.

Here, the focus is on FDM-based 4D printing, with the use of thermoplastics for creating artifacts. In studying issues regarding weakened structural load and limited design quality, the researchers worked with a structure fabricated from polylactic acid (PLA) and carbon fiber reinforced PLA (CFPLA). Their goal was to strengthen the 4D printed artifacts, along with creating a workflow comprising physical experiments and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) for materials characterization. The workflow was then used for the samples created with different printing parameters for analysis.

Printing methods in 4D do still have numerous limitations, from issues with lack of stiffness to inaccurate numerical simulation, and a range of challenges with materials and mechanical properties and performance. As for simulation, the researchers also state that the processes must be more accurate and the materials must be stronger for 4D printing. Their answer was to use carbon-fiber PLA (CFPLA), a material easy to 3D print and also to mix with PLA to make a bi-layer fiber-reinforced composite (FRC).

“By programming the printing path, FRC can be conveniently and effectively designed and fabricated layerwise, and the accuracy of FRC design can also be improved,” stated the researchers.

Ultimately, the team created three designs for their study, employing the classic benefits of 3D printing, from the ability to create numerous versions without having to go back to the drawing table for a new prototype, along with speed in production, and affordability. They created the following:

  • Modular lamp cover – divided into the 2×4 grid as the top section, a 2×2 grid for the bottom left, and a 2×2 as the bottom right.
  • Bottleholder – sized at approximately 500mm x 200mm.
  • Shoe support – an adaptation piece, consisting of a top and a bottom

Modular lamp cover design iterations. Results show the lamp cover pieces can fit the lamp quite well after eight iterations.

Final configurations from simulation (A-B) and experiment (CD), where a-a’, b-b’, c-c’ and d-d’ are four different point pairs. Simulation accuracy is quantified by comparing the distance between each point pair in simulation and the corresponding distance in experiment.

Bottle holder design iteration. Results show the bottle holder can fit
the bottle quite well after six iterations.

The design iteration of the shoe supporter. The shape of the shoe
supporter design is finalized to fit the shape of the foot by going through this iterative process

“To accurately conduct the simulation, experiments have been conducted to quantify the hyperelasticity and viscoelasticity of the thermoplastic component of FRC. These tests include uniaxial tensile and compression tests for the elastic component, DMA for the viscous component and uniaxial unloading-reloading with different strain levels for plastic deformation and the Mullins effect,” concluded the researchers.

“The accuracy of our method is both computationally and experimentally verified with several creative design examples and is measured to be at least 95%. We believe the presented workflow is essential to the combination of geometry, material mechanism, and design, and has various potential applications.”

Today it seems as if 3D printing and 4D printing are almost growing in tandem, as so many new materials are studied and put into use depending on a wide range of research studies as well as users on every level. From innovating with actuators to improving performance, and printing with composites, a wide range of studies continue to be performed.

What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

[Source / Images: ‘Thermoplastic Fiber Reinforced Composite Material Characterization and Precise Finite Element Analysis for 4D Printing’]

Share this Article


Recent News

MX3D Uses Robot Arm to Make 3D Printed Robot Arm, Installs It on Robot

3DTrust Releases Intelligent Powder Management Solution for Quality Control



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D printed automobiles

3D Printed Food


You May Also Like

Using Ultrasonic Waves to Analyze Residual Stress in 3D Printed Metal Parts

Researchers from the Czech Republic and Brazil have come together to highlight ultrasonic testing for stress analysis in ‘Residual stress analysis of additive manufacturing of metallic parts using ultrasonic waves:...

Velo3D Secures Further $12M in Funding for Metal 3D Printing

After already securing $28 million in a series-D round of investment just this April, Velo3D has announced an additional $12 million in funding for the series. This brings the total...

3D Systems Streamlines Software for Reverse Engineering

3D Systems has announced the latest versions of its Geomagic Design X and Geomagic Wrap  software, this time claiming “first-to-market capabilities” for streamlining workflows and improving design precision. New features...

3D Printing News Briefs: May 12, 2020 Nanofabrica, Voxeljet, Elementum, AMPOWER

We’re all business today in 3D Printing News Briefs – Nanofabrica has raised $4 million in funding, and voxeljet is expanding its presence in India. Elementum 3D has achieved an...


Shop

View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.