McGill University Researchers Review Bioprinting with Soft Materials: Challenges & Solutions
Researchers in Quebec from the Department of Mechanical Engineering at McGill University are delving into more specific topics regarding cell fabrication and tissue engineering in ‘Extrusion bioprinting of soft materials: An emerging technique for biological model fabrication.’ Complex geometric structures that can be created via bioinks (soft materials) are the focus of review, along with the varying methods for extrusion and the creation of in vitro models.
Just as traditional 3D printing is performed with filaments—most often made from a variety of different colorful polymers—bioprinting is performed through different types of cell-laden bioinks. Different types of hardware may be preferred too, to include:
- Inkjet bioprinting – an affordable method often created through droplet generation featuring piezo-electric voltage.
- Stereolithography – also known as SLA, this method employs laser technology and curing that relies on polymer solutions (filled in a reservoir) for materials.
- Laser-induced forward transfer (LIFT) – this system is comprised of a laser, focusing apparatus, and ribbon responding to light, with the bioink layer usually maintained under the donor layer.
- Extrusion – these types of systems are most common for bioprinting, with bioink loaded into cartridges and then extruded through nozzles.
The researchers go into much detail regarding extrusion-based bioprinting and its advantages such as the ability to create materials dense with cells, along with allowing the creation of heterogeneous models—and as the authors point out, this is particularly vital to tissue engineering and the future engineering of human organs. Extrusion bioprinting has also become more affordable over time and is extremely customizable—a facet that is usually enticing to experienced users, and especially in the science lab. As for disadvantages, sustainability of cells can be a major issue—and both resolution and speed may still be somewhat inferior in many systems too.
“Current efforts have been focused towards the design and optimization of bioinks and implementation of better extrusion mechanisms, nozzle diameters, and control systems, to increase printing resolution and achieve better deposition times without compromising cell viability and model fidelity,” state the researchers.
Three different categories of bioprinting have been achieved so far, to include bioprinting of biomimetic matrix structures optimized for subsequent cell-seeding, bioinks that support the direct deposition of embedded living biological matter, and engineering bioactivity and biofunctionality into bioink formulations. Recent popularity in bioprinting has also sparked off commercialization of the technique and accompanying systems. The authors also point out numerous ‘practical considerations’ regarding bioprinting:
- Bioink can be challenging to maintain and is prone to dehydration.
- Surface tension may minimize surface energies of bioink, affecting the entire system—and structures being printed.
- Thermal diffusion may be uneven within the bioink cartridge, damaging sensitive materials.
- Cell viability is a constant point of concern as it can be exceedingly difficult to keep cells alive for successful bioprinting.
Soft matter bioinks are discussed also, with hydrogels leading the way as the main topic. This is an extremely popular vehicle today for bioprinted structures and can retain large amounts of water within their networks. The researchers point out that there are many advantages to using hydrogels, but they also may lack the proper anchoring required for cells to adhere and then migrate.
These types of bioinks have led to the creation of many complex models today meant to promote tissue regeneration—from vascular models to those containing brain tissue. Challenges persist though—and as is usually true with any new technological development at first, a lack of standards; in this case, standards would be relative to printability. The number of cells in bio-ink is another challenge. A bioink may be cell-laden, but in comparison to what? And what types of nozzle and settings will cause the least amount of stress on cells? The last consideration the researchers ponder is whether bioprinting really possesses the ability to imitate human tissue as required; however scientists are making rapid strides in eliminating obstacles to bioprinting as the stakes for changing the face of medicine as we know it are so very high.
“As stated, the technique is rapidly developing, and we firmly believe that the currently existing challenges can be addressed in the future,” conclude the researchers.
It is hard to describe one element of 3D printing that is ‘taking the world by storm’ these days as there are so many innovations continually being presented to the world—meant for a variety of powerful applications. Bioprinting is significant, however, as researchers are not only engineering tissue but edging closer and closer to the creation of human organs in the lab. In the meantime, we have followed stories on machine learning and drop-on-demand techniques, creating neural tissue with chitosan-gelatin hydrogels, and even the use of stem cells from Alzheimer’s patients to assist in further research.
What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.[Source / Images: ‘Extrusion bioprinting of soft materials: An emerging technique for biological model fabrication’]
You May Also Like
4D Printing in China: Shape Memory Polymers and Continuous Carbon Fiber
Researchers have been looking further into the benefits of shape memory polymers (SMPs) with the addition of raw materials in the form of continuous carbon fiber (CCF). Authors Xinxin Shen,...
3D Printed Wireless Biosystems for Monitoring Cerebral Aneurysms in Real Time
Continuing to further the progress between 3D printing and electronics within the medical field, authors Robert Herbert, Saswat Mishra, Hyo-Ryoung Lim, Hyoungsuk Yoo, and Woon-Hong Yeo explore a new method...
Feasibility Models to Determine Efficacy of 3D Printing Over Traditional Methods
In ‘Model for Evaluating Additive Manufacturing Feasibility in End-Use Production,’ authors Matt Ahtiluoto, Asko Uolevi Ellman, and Eric Coatenea encourage the idea of exploring 3D printing for designs first, comparing...
Refining Macro and Microscopic Topology Optimization for AM Processes
Researchers from Italy and Germany continue along the path so many are following in refining and perfecting 3D printing processes. In the recently published ‘Structural multiscale topology optimization with stress...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.