Engineers at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) and NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) have recently 3D printed near-fully-dense GRCop-42 components. As is so often the case with today’s 3D printed components, these latest parts may also prove to outshine those typically made through more conventional methods.
The GRCop-42’s 3D printing process and parameters were developed on a ConceptLaser M2 (Gen 1 2012 model) PBF machine, chosen due to its copper-friendliness, featuring both an inert glovebox and build chamber, and the 400 W laser able to reach the property density for melting the type 42 powder in use for this project (the follow-up to the previous 84 powder which was not as easy for powder vendors to manufacture to specs).
As engineers delved into the build, they discovered right away that higher CED samples were running too hot, wicking heat out into surrounding areas like a halo. Lower-end parts were not fully melting.
“These 25 density blocks were sent to GRC for destructive microscopy, where they were sectioned in the yz plane, polished through 1-µm diamond, and imaged at magnification using a Nikon® Eclipse MR200 optical microscope,” stated the researchers. “GRC then used ImageJ image analysis software to determine the average pore size and average porosity of each specimen, calculated circular equivalent diameters in Excel, and plotted the values on a color map aligned with the parameters.”
Porosity and maps relating to average pore size were overlaid, resulting in new parameter sets at over 98 percent density.
Samples were then placed in the hot isostatic press in a standard cycle which had previously been used for the GRCop-84 powder. Once samples were pressed, the engineers shipped them to GRC for further refining in both machining processes and tensile testing at room temperature:
“GRC machined the samples into ASTM E8-style round tensile specimens with 9.525-mm threaded grips and a 6.35-mm-diameter gauge section, then tensile tested them in a crosshead (displacement) control at a crosshead rate of 0.635 mm/min with a 2,275-kg capacity load cell (Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013),” stated the researchers. “An extensometer with 19-mm gauge was used to record strain for the first 10% of the test, with a displacement control to ensure quick, consistent tests regardless of the build quality of each specimen.”
“Colored green, 20 of the specimens resulted in a very tight range of ultimate tensile strengths (UTSs), ranging only from 339 MPa to 356 MPa with elongations >20%. Of the five remaining specimens, two of them (NE1-1 and NE1-2, colored yellow) had in-family UTS but lower elongations of 12% and 15%. Two of them (E-1 and E-2, colored red) broke much lower (180 MPa and 197 MPa) with almost no elongation, while one (NW1-1, colored blue) broke much higher (459 MPa) with medium elongation (12%). The NE1-1, NE1-2, E-1, and E-2 specimens correlate directly to the highest overall porosity and highest average pore size in the initial density study. The NW1-1 sample was inadvertently excluded from the HIP cycle, which explains the very high strength with lower ductility as well.”
The study was successful overall as teams from MSFC and GRC evaluated the powder comprehensively, concluding that it will serve its purpose as a printable alloy for use in rocket propulsion components. They knew ahead of time that the most important features they were seeking were:
- High thermal conductivity
- Excellent creep resistance
- Low-cycle fatigue life
- Strength at elevated temperatures
The research teams also found that with 3D printing, they were saving time by 20 percent.
“What remains for completion is extensive testing of the established nominal parameter set in this study. The next step will be to run several large tensile builds with different lots of powder, with specimens scattered across the entire 250-mm build plate to not only verify the parameter set but also rule out any other external effects like position on the build plate or material lot/vendor,” concluded the researchers.
While NASA seems to be relying on 3D printing more steadily as it gains momentum within the mainstream and offers so many options in hardware, software, and materials, their designers and engineers have pioneered use of such progressive technology for decades. Lately, however, NASA has been bringing 3D printing further into the technological fold in relation to rockets with critical items such as igniters, nozzles, and large components for engines. Find out more about their most recent foray into 3D printing here. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.[Source / Images: Three-Dimensional Printing GRCop-42]
You May Also Like
What is Metrology?
3D Metrology What is 3D metrology? Metrology is the science of measurement. It establishes a common understanding of units, crucial in linking and understanding human activities. When we apply metrology...
Interview with Mei Ogata of JTL America on Testing for 3D Printing
As we move from prototyping to production, testing is becoming more and more important. Crucial in qualifying parts and materials, but also in establishing QA or developing new materials, testing...
Fast Things 8: The Shape Game and Mrs. Incredible
Imagine the answer to life, the universe, and everything is: donut. In a world of Fast Things, 3D Printing is the logical production technology. With our technology, you can go...
3D Printing News Briefs: June 8, 2019
In this week’s 3D Printing News Briefs, we’re talking about partnerships, new software and buildings, and a neat 3D printed miniature. Together, Evolve Additive Solutions and Evonik are developing materials...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.