Researchers Use Sharebot NG 3D Printer to Test Carbon Nanotube Composites

RAPID

Share this Article

3D printing can be quite sensational, with innovations continually emerging from all corners of the world. Many creations tend to be in your face, larger than life, and with the accompanying hardware to match. From entire 3D printed villages to giant statues, cars and drones, and houses, the options do seem infinitely available and exciting. But in the world of science, much that lies beneath what the naked eye can see is being propelled forward via 3D printing too, on the nanoscale.

Sharebot recently released a case study regarding 3D printed nanotubes created with the Sharebot NG, a desktop model geared toward both the research and development and educational realms. Along with that, the group of researchers involved have also published a paper on their findings. In ‘Filaments Production and Fused Deposition Modelling of ABS/Carbon Nanotubes Composites,’ authored by Sithiprumnea Dul, Luca Fambri, and Alessandro Pegoretti (Industrial Engineering department and INSTM Research Unit, Università di Trento), we find out more about how carbon nanotubes can actually improve 3D printed parts.

In this research, the key was to infuse FDM 3D printing filament with nanofillers. This provides a conductive element, with the nanoparticles making it possible to combine 3D printing with electronics; for example, the conductive nanoparticles can make it easier to fabricate the following:

  • Sensors
  • Cases with electromagnetic interference shielding performances
  • Circuits
  • Microbatteries

The researchers point out that other nanoparticles have played a part in 3D printing, but rarely with filaments in FDM printing. They used an internal mixer and a twin-screw extruder to make filament pellets that included the nanofiller, left to dry under a vacuum for two hours.

“Extensive thermal, mechanical, and electrical characterization of the obtained filaments was carried out. Afterwards, selected filaments were used to feed a high-temperature FDM 3D printer to specify the effects of CNT on the properties 3D-printed components along various build orientations,” state the researchers in their paper.

Schematic of 3D-printed dumbbell: (a) horizontal concentric (HC); (b) horizontal 45°angle (H45) and (c) vertical concentric (VC).

In examining the filament during research, the team found that carbon nanotubes had a positive effect on resistance for long-lasting loads, and both tensile modulus and strength was improved in filament; however, they did not find this to be the case in 3D prints that were being made in a vertical manner. There was a noted reduction in elongation, however, at the break of the composites, in direct proportion to the amount or fraction of carbon nanotubes. Thermal stability was promoted by CNT, while conductivity in their samples was reduced as samples were ‘markedly incremented.’

 “Electrical conductivity of 3D-printed samples was markedly incremented but a partial loss in conductivity with respect to filament nanocomposite was also observed. Moreover, the resistivity of 3D-printed parts is highly dependent on the build microfilaments orientation, which consequently leads to different surface temperature increment under applied voltages. For FDM-printed parts, the carbon nanotubes in playing the best reinforcement in thermal mechanical behavior for HC and H45 orientation but less effective in electrical properties,” concluded the researchers.

If you would like to find out more about this research, download the paper here.

What do you think of this 3D printing news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below. 

[Source: ShareBot / Images: Nanomaterials]

 

Share this Article


Recent News

3D Printing Unpeeled: Wind Turbines, Probiotics and Lenses

3D Printing Financials: Markforged Reports Q1 2024 Results Amid $17.3M Patent Litigation Setbacks



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

3D Printing Financials: Steakholder Foods Balances Losses and 3D Printed Tech Advances in 2023

A pioneer in the field of 3D printed meat and fish, Steakholder Foods (Nasdaq: STKH) disclosed its 2023 financial results, a year highlighted by technological progress but overshadowed by financial...

3D Printing Financials: Protolabs’ Q1 3D Printing Revenue is Flat, Company Advances in Technology Push

Protolabs (NYSE: PRLB) has kicked off 2024 with a mild boost in revenue, revealing how the Minnesota-based company manages to adapt and thrive even in uncertain market conditions. While the...

Supply Chain Management and the Role of 3D Printing Digital Inventories

As the additive manufacturing (AM) industry grows beyond its humble roots as a rapid prototyping technology, it has been adopted by some of the world’s leading companies to produce not...

3D Printing Financials: Materialise’s Profitability Amid Revenue Dip in Q1 2024

Materialise (Nasdaq: MTLS) has released its first-quarter earnings for 2024, highlighting a challenging quarter with some key advances despite a dip in revenue. While navigating a mixed performance across its...