Winemaking is a complicated process that involves a lot more than just smashing up some grapes and letting them sit to ferment. It’s a process that requires a lot of knowledge, and a lot of equipment. Like almost everything else, winemaking has been changed by technology, and winemakers and researchers have taken advantage of more advanced testing equipment as well as processes like automation and robotics to better study winemaking and yeast fermentation.
When researching small-batch fermentation, the conditions of volume production are typically reproduced by using water-filled airlocks integrated with testing flasks. The airlocks keep oxygen away from the yeast while allowing carbon dioxide to escape during fermentation, simulating the kinetics of a large tank. Two researchers at the University of Adelaide, Professor Vladimir Jiranek and Dr. Tommaso Watson, decided to try automating their wine research by integrating robotic sampling into the process. This would involve redesigning the water-filled airlocks.
In the new automated process, a robotic arm would take samples from testing flasks, reducing the number of manual steps in the testing process as well as the possibility for human error. The airlocks, the design of which hadn’t been changed in years, would need to be redesigned in order to fit a large number of flasks on a static test platform. The researchers’ goal was to be able to fit 96 flasks on a single test platform. In collaboration with contract manufacturer The Technology House (TTH), they began working on ways to reduce the size of the flasks and airlocks.
First, they tried creating a new airlock from multiple stainless steel parts, put together with silver soldering. The design was a good, compact one, with strong construction and the ability to be sterilized by autoclave at 121ºC, but it had several disadvantages. The heavy stainless steel had the potential to damage the glass flasks, and it also didn’t allow visibility of water levels inside. The acidic environment produced during the fermentation process put the silver soldering at risk for corrosion, too. Moreover, this method was expensive and difficult, as it required multiple parts.
Those drawbacks led the researchers to try another method: 3D printing. They used an FDM 3D printer to manufacture the airlocks using ABS and PLA materials, hoping for a more lightweight design that wouldn’t damage the flasks and would offer better internal visibility. 3D printing achieved those goals, and also enabled the researchers to create a more compact and refined design with complex internal airflow chambers. This method wasn’t perfect either, though: ABS and PLA are temperature-sensitive materials that could not be sterilized via autoclave like the stainless steel could. In addition, imperfect adhesion between layers allowed for leaks.
The team didn’t want to give up on 3D printing altogether, though, so they turned to Carbon’s Digital Light Synthesis (DLS) technology. The Technology House was one of the initial partners selected to begin using Carbon’s technology in its early days, so they were well familiar with Carbon’s M1 and M2 3D printers and suggested DLS for the third prototype. Using Carbon’s Cyanate Ester resin, the team 3D printed a third version of the airlock, and found that it combined the advantages of the previous two iterations, as well as eliminating the disadvantages.
The Cyanate Ester resin delivered a final part with a much better finish than the FDM part, and it was easily designed and 3D printed in a single piece. As the resin is designed for engineering-level applications, it could be sterilized via autoclave at 121°C without any damage, and the part was watertight and airtight. From design to production, the airlock took less than one week to create, a reduction in production time of over 67%. Costs were also reduced by 60%.
The compact airlock also allowed for a much smaller flask design, which worked out even better than the researchers had initially hoped: instead of the projected 96, they were able to fit 384 flasks on a platform for easy, quick robotic sampling. The University of Adelaide and The Technology House plan to continue to work together to produce and use thousands of the 3D printed airlocks over the next few years, allowing for automated, error-free wine testing – which should ultimately result in better wine. Discuss in the Wine Testing forum at 3DPB.com.Carbon]
You May Also Like
3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: January 9, 2022
After a long break, we’re back with our first 3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup of 2022! Things are starting back up a little slowly, with less than ten webinars...
3D Printing News Briefs, January 1st, 2022: CES 2022, Standards, Business, & More
Happy New Year! We’re starting with this week’s CES 2022 in today’s 3D Printing News Briefs, then moving on to a new AM standard and business news from Roboze and...
3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: December 12, 2021
As we get closer to the end of 2021, it seems like the number of webinars and events are slowing down ever so slightly. But we still have plenty to...
ICAM 2021: Keynotes on 3D Printing in Healthcare & Aerospace
At last month’s International Conference on Additive Manufacturing (ICAM) 2021 in Anaheim, California, hosted by ASTM International’s Additive Manufacturing Center of Excellence (AMCOE), a wide variety of topics were covered,...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.