Additive manufacturing (3D printing) has a potential to revolutionize almost every aspect of human endeavor. Currently there are a handful of techniques that allow us to form objects via addition of material. Most commonly used techniques utilize material prepared before printing. Which is deposited and either melted, sintered or hardened to form desired product. Among the most important of the 3D printing techniques are Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), Selective Laser Sintering or Melting (SLS, SLM) and Stereolithography (SLA). Reactive Inkjet Printing (RIP) is a method in which a material is formed by chemical reaction during the process of deposition. In this way the material is being created during the deposition which allows for more flexibility. There is no need to use three different filaments, just two that can be mixed in different proportions. The scope of possible materials is much greater than in well-established techniques. Using this mode allows the change of created material during the printing process. Thus allowing to manufacture products with gradual change in various properties such as color, elasticity, conductivity.
The RIP approach is somewhat similar to SLA. Unlike the SLA where the liquid ink is solidified by the UV light, in RIP the liquid is solidified by the chemical reaction between different ingredients. For this reason RIP does not come with the limitations associated with appliance of the UV light.
Since the components of the ink are reactive the ink parts must be kept separate. This approach requires specially designed chemical components that will react rapidly to quickly gel the deposited material to allow for building of the product layer by layer. The gel has to be chemically reactive to bond to the next as well as previous layer. Mixing different components in different proportions allows for obtaining materials with changing parameters i.e. lowering the amount of the hardening agent during the printing process will result with materials having higher elasticity. As we change the proportions during the printing process we can manufacture products with a gradual change of properties.
This approach can be utilized in 3D printing as well as in 2D printing. In 2D printing ink consists mostly of solvent that needs to either evaporate or sink into the material. Since the deposited material can be colored and does not contain any solvent, RIP can become a chance for solvent-less inkjet printing.
The true challenge lies in combining the two components in a way that ensures solidification will not occur prematurely. We developed a few strategies in order to solve this problem. First the mixing of the components cannot occur with the contact to the solid material of the dispenser. This would result in clogging since the components solidify rapidly. In order to resolve this problem we need to mix the components on the surface or when the components are approaching the surface. To successfully mix the components on the surface the knowledge of precise distance to the surface is required. Since the droplets of the deposited material are small relative to the distance traveled even small deviations in the distance to the surface would result in components not hitting each other. Which would result with components not mixing, and the reaction wouldn’t occur. To make this approach widely usable we need to allow for greater tolerance. This is why there is a need to develop a type of dispenser that would allow us to mix the components within the printing head but before the surface. To facilitate such a process requires a specially designed printing head.
The printing head has to perform two tasks. First it has to allow for the mixing of the components, secondly it must minimize the possibility of clogging. We have prepared several designs. The dispensers of the reactive components must be separated to minimize the chance that the dispensing nozzle would clog. This is achieved by either adding a physical barrier (Fig 1), stream of compressed air (Fig 2) or electric field, if the components are charged. Additionally the whole printing head can be washed with compressed air to remove any satellite component droplets that can be created during deposition. Washing will further reduce the chance of clogging but can impede the precision of the printing, due to turbulences of air near the surface. Secondly, the printing head must be able to mix the components without the contact with the mixed components. The simplest solution, the dispensers are inclined to each other to allow the reactive components to collide with each other and mix the ingredients before they hit the surface. This is illustrated on the figure 2. The printing head may have a special system that will guide the component to the mixing point with the other component without the contact with the material of the printing head. This can be achieved by guiding the components by the flow of air, or by means of utilizing electric fields (Fig 3).
This technology is still at early stages of development, but we are confident that the end result will allow for easy manufacturing of products with a gradual change of properties in manufactured materials or for solvent-free printing on ordinary surfaces. In our laboratory we are developing new sets of components that will allow for the gradual change in composition, as well as designing better printing heads to tackle any arising obstacles. Our results are promising and the concept was tested in the laboratory scale. In the pictures you can observe our laboratory setup for studying the process of combining of the two reactive inks (fig 4), and the results of our experiments when combining of the components at 1 to 1 ratio (fig 5) and at 1 to 6 ratio (fig 6). This technology still needs a lot of work in order to make it commercially available. But maybe it is high time to associate RIP not with “The End” but with the many new possibilities that this technology can deliver.
Jeute explains of future plans for the technology:
Generally speaking the project is to be commercialized at least partially, but this does not seem to happen within at least next 2 years. We have plans to develop the whole range of printers for different applications, but it will take lots of time and resources to reach the point where the proof of concept would apply not only to general principles of the technology, but also to specific prototypes for specific applications. As of today we know that it does work and is doable based on the working model which shows the real coalescence, diffusion and chemical reaction of solidification in operation. From this point there is still a very long way to the point, where we could say the technology is applicable to industry and precisely evaluate, what it would take to apply it commercially.
At this stage we are not prepared to sell anything and are doing well on our own. Having said that I still admit, that we remain open for any kind of partnership with persons or firms who could contribute to the project with their specific knowledge or know how rather than capital in order to enhance the R&D process.
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Stay up-to-date on all the latest news from the 3D printing industry and recieve information and offers from thrid party vendors.
You May Also Like
3D Systems Buys High-Speed 3D Printing Firm dp polar
The 3D printing mergers and acquisitions continue apace. On the heels of Markforged’s buyout of Digital Metal and Nano Dimension’s 12 percent purchase of Stratasys, 3D Systems (NYSE: DDD) has...
New Player in Space: X-Bow’s Test Rocket Reaches Orbit with 3D Printed Motors
Just four months after coming out of stealth mode, space technology company X-Bow Launch Systems successfully launched its first rocket in a test carried out in partnership with the Department...
Sakuu Opens Battery 3D Printing Facility in Silicon Valley
Silicon Valley startup Sakuu is using some of the funds from its total $62 million raised to open a new facility for its battery 3D printing platform. The multi-million-dollar site...
US DoE Awards $3M to Fortify and polySpectra for 3D Printed Tooling
The US Department of Energy (DOE) announced 30 projects that have been selected to receive a total of $57.9 million in grants from the Advanced Manufacturing Office (AMO). Among the...