There’s so much more that goes into a 3D print than many people realize. To those unfamiliar with how the process works, it looks like simple magic – but there are a lot of factors that go into the process of turning a design into a physical 3D object, and a lot of decisions to be made. For example, what kind of infill should be used in a particular print? Infill percentage and pattern affect a lot more than just the weight and strength of a print, as studies have shown, and determining the optimal parameters can be tricky.
There are a lot of infill patterns one can choose from, including everything from standard honeycombs and triangles to cats and sharks, courtesy of MakerBot. One of the tricky aspects of infill optimization is trying to strike a good balance between strength and weight – it can be tough to design a strong, solid part without it ending up as heavy as a doorstop. But now a group of researchers from the Technical University of Denmark, Delft University of Technology, and the Technical University of Munich have developed a new type of infill that imparts durable strength without weighing an object down.
Like so many of the most effective human inventions, the researchers’ infill design was inspired by naturally occurring structures – in this case, bone.
“The so-called infill optimization automatically generates an porous infill structure for 3D printing,” Dr. Jun Wu, Assistant Professor of Advanced Manufacturing at TU Delft, told 3DPrint.com. “The numerically optimized structure is very similar to the trabecular bone, which is lightweight and mechanically strong. It gives valuable insight for linking engineering infill and nature infill.”
Trabecular bone, also known as cancellous or spongy bone, is less dense than cortical bone, the other type of bone tissue found in the human body. Composed of tiny lattice structures, trabecular bone is lightweight and flexible, making up the interior of bone structures, particularly near joints and in the ribs, skull and vertebrae. It may possess less strength than the exterior cortical bone, but it’s still plenty strong, especially for its light weight. Those are the properties that inspired the research team, and in a paper entitled “Infill Optimization for Additive Manufacturing — Approaching Bone-like Porous Structures,” they detail how they worked to translate those properties from nature to 3D printing.
According to the team, their methodology built on voxel-wise topology optimization.
“In particular, for the purpose of generating sparse yet stable structures distributed in the interior of a given shape, we propose upper bounds on the localized material volume in the proximity of each voxel in the design domain,” the paper states. “We then aggregate the local per-voxel constraints by their p-norm into an equivalent global constraint, in order to facilitate an efficient optimization process. Implemented on a high-resolution topology optimization framework, our results demonstrate mechanically optimized, detailed porous structures which mimic those found in nature.”
A complex mathematical algorithm was designed to generate an infill that resembled the porous structure of bone. The study details the multiple variables and sub-structures the researchers tested. In the end, the porous, trabecular bone-like structure was concluded to be highly promising for 3D printing – particularly large, lightweight parts. There’s still work to be done to further optimize the technique, but the printed structures held up well in testing for strength and robustness.
“We have presented a structural optimization method for obtaining stiffness optimized porous structures,” the paper concludes. “These numerically optimized structures visually resemble trabecular bone, which is lightweight and robust with respect to material deficiency and force variations. This makes the optimized interior structures an ideal candidate for application-specific infill in additive manufacturing.”
Dr. Wu is the first author of the paper; additional contributors include Niels Aage, Rüdiger Westermann, and Ole Sigmund. Discuss in the Bone Infill forum at 3DPB.com.
You May Also Like
3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: July 25th, 2021
From compact SLS 3D printing and SOLIDWORKS certifications to full-color 3D printing, 3D printing for cosmetic dentistry, photopolymers, and more, we’ve got a lot of topics covered in this week’s...
Trump the Mundane Performance in Smart Printing — Creality CR-10 Smart Vanquishes with Advanced Functions
In an era that 3D printing functions seems to sit in a stereotyped mundane track, how to renovate turns to be of much importance that often draws the attention of...
3D Printing vs. CNC Machining
What’s the Best Way to Make Your Part? CNC machining is a common subtractive manufacturing technology. Unlike 3D printing, the process typically begins with a solid block of material (blank)...
3D Printing News Briefs, July 17, 2021: SME, Z3DLAB & CNRS, GKN Additive, FibreTuff & RSNA, Nano Dimension & Hensoldt, ioTech
In today’s 3D Printing News Briefs, we’ll tell you about a rebranded case study award, and then a few stories about 3D printing materials. Finishing up, we’re sharing news about...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.