Some may say that metal 3D printing is what will ultimately bring the technology to the forefront of manufacturing. The idea of printing custom objects on a one-to-one basis brings unlimited potential to the entire manufacturing sector. Currently there are numerous methods of printing with metal materials, most of which are extremely expensive, pricing the technology out of reach for the majority of companies and individuals.
Researchers at Southern Methodist University (SMU) have been working on a unique system of 3D printing metal objects, utilizing a 6-axis robot. The method is called Laser-based Direct Metal Deposition (LBDMD), and when combined with the Universitiy’s MultiFab System, provides for several benefits over other more common methods of additive manufacturing.
“MultiFab combines depositions by welding and laser cladding, multi-axis machining, and in-situ inspection into one highly integrated system based on a 6-axis robot and a 5-axis high speed CNC machining center, providing the next generation technology for rapid and precise net-shape manufacturing using metals and ceramics,” Radovan Kovacevic explained.
MultiFab is a process which utilizes a combination of laser technology with welding, and cnc machining to create metal objects of higher quality than other methods of 3D printing. The 3D printing process, unlike selective laser sintering (SLS) is able to build objects up, one layer at a time in a similar fashion as we have seen with FDM/FFF based machines which extrude plastics. Instead of extruding molten plastics however, the LBDMD method, lays down metal powder as a 4 kilowatt laser follows, sintering it in place.
The technology actually dates back to patent filings by Professor Radovan Kovacevic in 2003, in which he came up with a method of controlling the molten metal pools in the process of laser based additive manufacturing. However, Kovacevic and SMU have just recently released a video of their working prototype, which utilizes this controlled molten pool system that allows for the fabrication of objects with straighter, more symmetrical lines and geometries (seen below).
Thanks to this laser system, the MultiFab process allows for less porosity in printed objects, a smaller heat affected zone, the ability to create fine geometrical features, potential for multiple metal fabrication, and better control of material properties. The welding aspects of the process lend themselves to creating objects with larger geometrical features, a controlled and higher deposition rate, and controlled heat input.
Both the LBDMD system and the MultiFab process remain a work in progress, but the potential is there for completely upending the metal 3D printing space. If a machine like this could be priced affordably, the future of metal product manufacturing looks very bright. What do you think about this process? Discuss in the LBDMD 3D printing forum thread on 3DPB.com. Check out the videos below.
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Stay up-to-date on all the latest news from the 3D printing industry and receive information and offers from third party vendors.
Print Services
Upload your 3D Models and get them printed quickly and efficiently.
You May Also Like
Automated Fill Print: An Obviously Better Way to 3D Print
I’m not saying that I invented this or that I’m the first to try this. For many years, people have been filling the infill patterns of material extrusion prints with...
INJEKTO Brings Desktop Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds to the Workshop
Recently, a host of new machines have come to complement desktop 3D printing over the past few years. From desktop lathes and laser cutters, we are seeing a Deskside Manufacturing...
Skuld Brings Additive-Enabled Casting Closer to Production Reality
Over the past decade, much of the U.S. Department of Defense’s (DoD) additive manufacturing (AM) strategy has focused on proving that advanced manufacturing could work inside legacy casting environments. Today,...
QuesTek’s Space Bet: New Alloys Built for 3D Printing, Not for the Old Rules
If you ask most people what’s holding back 3D printing in aerospace, they usually think the answer is better hardware; mainly faster machines, bigger build chambers, and tighter process control....
























