AMS 2026

U.S. Congress Holds Hearing on Cutting Healthcare Costs and Points to 3D Printing

RAPID

Share this Article

A U.S. House subcommittee held a hearing this week on how technology can help lower the rising cost of healthcare for Americans. Lawmakers pointed to 3D printing as a key example of a tool that could make healthcare both more efficient and cheaper. 

Representative Eric Burlison (Republican congressman from Missouri), chairman of the Subcommittee on Economic Growth, Energy Policy, and Regulatory Affairs, opened a joint hearing titled “Lowering the Cost of Healthcare: Technology’s Role in Driving Affordability.” The session focused on how new technologies, like telehealth, wearable health devices, and 3D printing, can reduce costs and improve care delivery.

Burlison argued that current government policies and regulations, including parts of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), have made healthcare more expensive and slowed innovation. The hearing brought in experts to explain how technology could change that. According to the House Oversight and Accountability Committee, the hearing’s witness list included Brian Whorley, CEO of Paytient Technologies; Dr. Darius Lakdawalla, a health economist at the University of Southern California; Dr. Ziad Obermeyer, a professor of health policy and management at UC Berkeley; Chris Jacobs, founder of Juniper Research Group; and Sophia Tripoli, Senior Director of Health Policy at Families USA.

While lawmakers pointed to technologies such as 3D printing as possible ways to help lower healthcare costs, the witnesses primarily came from policy, economics, and healthcare research backgrounds, rather than from additive manufacturing or medical device production, keeping the discussion focused on broader healthcare systems and policy considerations.

3D Systems healthcare sector. Image courtesy of 3D Systems.

Why 3D printing matters here

3D printing is already used widely in healthcare to make custom medical parts quickly and at low cost, print prosthetics, dental devices, implants, and surgical tools, and produce items on demand, reducing waste and inventory needs.

At the hearing, lawmakers pointed to examples like these to show that when healthcare providers can manufacture devices faster and cheaper, it can help lower the total price patients pay. In medical 3D printing, a main focus is personalization. Many applications involve custom prosthetics, implants, and surgical tools that are made to fit each patient’s body. This patient-specific approach is common in medical 3D printing, especially as hospitals and clinics look for a better fit, reduced material waste, and more efficient production.

Tantalum components, manufactured using Croom Medical’s TALOS™ additive manufacturing platform, were carefully unloaded post-print. Image courtesy of Croom.

The hearing builds on recent policy discussions around healthcare costs and the use of digital and manufacturing technologies in medicine. Healthcare costs in the United States have been rising faster than both inflation and wages. For example, in 2025, average family health insurance premiums climbed about 6%, compared with roughly 2.7% inflation and roughly 4% wage growth. Over the past two decades, family premiums have increased by more than 300%, outpacing broader income and price trends. This is a major political and economic concern because it affects people’s access to care, not to mention their personal finances.

At the same time, new technologies are moving fast, and many believe they can help. Telehealth became common during the COVID-19 pandemic and showed that care can be delivered at a lower cost and with more flexibility. Wearable health devices help track patient conditions and can prevent expensive hospital visits. And of course, 3D printing has been moving from prototype labs into real-world medical use for years.

Lawmakers at the hearing emphasized that removing regulatory barriers could help these technologies be used more widely and help lower costs.

The hearing was about finding ways to make healthcare cheaper, and 3D printing was a great example that lawmakers want to push forward. It shows that technologies such as 3D printing are now part of the broader conversation about healthcare costs, as policymakers continue to explore how they might fit into the healthcare system.



Share this Article


Recent News

American Rheinmetall Orders $300K in 3D Printed Titanium Prototypes for U.S. Army Systems From IperionX

Roboze Opens U.S. Aerospace & Defense Headquarters in El Segundo



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

EOS Invests $3M In Its Texas Manufacturing & Logistics Facilities to Serve North American Customers

The trajectory of reshoring under President Trump has been largely a mixed bag so far. While tariffs still seem to be doing more harm than good to the U.S. domestic...

At AIAA SciTech 2026, 3D Printing Was Part of the Workflow — Part I

The AIAA SciTech Forum 2026 brought much of the aerospace community together in one place. With roughly 6,000 attendees, 115 exhibitors, 21 sponsors, and nearly 3,000 technical paper presentations, the...

3D Printing News Briefs, January 21, 2026: Scanning Inspection, Manufacturing Upskilling, & More

In 3D Printing News Briefs, we’ll start with 3D scanning news from Artec 3D. Then, Nanoscribe opened a demolab in Shanghai, and The Ohio State University Center for Design and...

Camp Lejeune’s II Marine Expeditionary Force Innovation Campus: An Existing Model for the U.S.’s Future in Additive Manufacturing

A recent article in Military.com highlights the II Marine Expeditionary Force (MEF) Innovation Campus, located at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in North Carolina. It provides a good touchstone for the...