AMS 2025

The Art of Post-Processing with Direct Metal Laser Sintering Technology

AM Research Military

Share this Article

Additive manufacturing (AM) and more specifically, direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) technology has brought unprecedented design freedom and application complexity to metal manufacturing. It has enabled the creation of complex, high-precision parts with often considerably shorter lead times than traditional means like welding or CNC machining. DMLS, a type of AM, uses high-powered lasers to melt and fuse powdered metal, layer by layer, to achieve detailed and intricate geometries. Leveraging metal 3D printing can unlock a variety of new strategies and part designs for your part production, but still requires post-processing due to the use of support structures and possible rough surfaces from the printing process. Let’s dive into what it takes to successfully post-process an AM part and what processes are best for the 3D printing process.

Heat Treatment and Stress Relief

Heat treatment is often necessary to relieve internal stresses induced during the 3D printing process. Heat treatment can be done with standard industrial furnaces or hot isostatic pressing (HIP) to enhance the mechanical properties and dimensional stability of the part. This is also a post-processing procedure that is performed before the removal of supports. Standard heat treatments often require heating the parts up to a high enough temperature where the material “relaxes”, then cooling it down, sometimes rapidly by dunking in water or oil, potentially with multiple steps to reach the final results.  HIP, on the other hand, applies high pressure and temperature simultaneously to eliminate porosity while achieving the desired metallurgical results. The choice of heat treatment depends on the material used and the desired final properties, ensuring that the part meets the stringent performance requirements of its final application.

Demonstration application of Al5X1 material that has been heat treated and anodized for both cosmetic coloring and corrosion resistance protective properties.

Support Structure Removal

During the metal 3D printing process, support structures are crucial to prevent warping and distortion, especially in overhanging areas. However, these supports must be carefully removed once printing is complete. Common removal techniques include wire  electrical discharge machining (EDM), milling, and grinding, or even using common hand tools. Each method demands precision to avoid damaging the part and to maintain dimensional accuracy. Proper support removal ensures that the part retains its designed shape and structural integrity, paving the way for subsequent post-processing steps. In the end, best strategy for support is to design it out. Support adds additional build time, requires post-processing time, and consumes extra material, so if there is an opportunity to modify the part according to Design for AM principles, it is favorable.

Example AM Metals Bracket built with support structures

Surface Finishing Techniques

After heat treatment and stress relief, and support structure removal,  a part may be functionally ready, but can also require a final step to smooth any rough edges or surfaces left by the support structures. This is called surface finishing – it enhances the appearance, functionality, and overall quality of the metal 3D printed parts. Here are few examples of surface finishing techniques:

Media Blasting/ Shot Peening: This involves bombarding the part with medias such as organics,  oxides, ceramic beads, or steel shot to smooth rough edges and improve surface uniformity. Each type of media creates a different surface finish.  Organic grit, like corn husks or walnut shells are used to simply remove additional powder on the surface without changing the surface texture.  Abrasive grits, like sand or aluminum oxide, remove material from the surface and impart a matte finish.  Steel shot will compact the surface, leaving a shinier finish while also helping to improve the strength of the part by creating a compressive strain on the surface.  This can be done with a post-processing system like a shot-blasting cabinet within a production facility.

Polishing: A more refined technique that uses abrasive materials to achieve a mirror-like finish, essential for applications demanding high aesthetics or low friction surfaces. If the part will be visible in the end-use application, this brings a more professional look and feel to the component.  In critical applications, having a smooth, polished surface can even extend its life as well.

Chemical Etching: This method uses chemical solutions to remove material at a microscopic level, providing a precise and controlled finish that is ideal for intricate designs.

For instance, medical implants often require extremely smooth surfaces to minimize bacterial growth and enhance biocompatibility, making polishing and chemical etching preferred choices.

Machining: In the additive world, we often refer to machining as “traditional manufacturing.”  It consists of mills or lathes or other machines that use a cutter to physically remove material from a surface.  In many production scenarios, machining is a critical part of the process.  Any mating features, like hinges, sealing grooves, or tight fits, will generally require a machining operation to reach the surface quality and tolerances necessary to ensure proper performance.  While AM can create amazingly complex structures, it is important to consider the overall system that the AM part will be integrated into and make sure that there are appropriate clearances to do all the necessary machining to make it work.

Example of the different surface finishes that can be achieved through post-processing and targeted to different areas of an application such as this acetabular cup implant.

Inspection and Qualification

Metal 3D printing is being leveraged more and more in critical part production for the aerospace, medical, and energy sectors. A robust inspection and quality assurance framework is necessary to ensure part accuracy, material properties, and overall performance.

Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) techniques like X-ray computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonic testing allow for the identification of internal defects or porosity without damaging the part. These methods provide detailed insights into the internal structure, confirming there are no hidden flaws that could compromise performance of the part when performing its high-intensity job within the complete product.

Destructive testing methods such as tensile testing and hardness testing involve subjecting parts to controlled stress or deformation to assess their mechanical properties. Although these tests destroy the sample, they provide invaluable data on the material’s strength, ductility, and toughness and measure the amount of strain that can be put on a part before it begins to fail. The qualification of parts additively manufactured is done by showcasing the statistical equivalence based on testing of many randomly selected parts across multiple builds and powder lots. In other words, it confirms that even if the batch of material, the system, and the batch of parts changes, the quality of the produced part remains the same. Creating an internal system to standardize the production process of additively manufactured parts is important for production in all metal 3D printing.

Advancing Your Metal 3D Printing Production

Post-processing and quality control are vital steps in the metal AM workflow, transforming raw 3D printed parts into high-quality, functional products. By meticulously addressing heat treatment, support structure removal, surface finishing, and employing rigorous inspection methods, manufacturers can ensure their 3D printed parts meet stringent specifications and performance criteria. As AM continues to evolve, these post-processing techniques will play an increasingly important role in unlocking the full potential of 3D printed metal components. To learn more about quality assurance testing and metal post-processing, read about EOS’ in-depth qualification process with the help of Additive Minds consulting.

Share this Article


Recent News

AMS 2025: Registration Rates Increase on December 6

Printing Money Episode 24: Q3 2024 Earnings Review with Troy Jensen, Cantor Fitzgerald



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

3D Printing Financials: 3D Systems Faces Challenges, Bets on Innovation

3D Systems (NYSE: DDD) closed its third quarter of 2024 with mixed results, navigating macroeconomic pressures while leaning on innovation to shape its future. The company reported a challenging sales...

Metal 3D Printing Supplier Continuum Powders Opens North America’s “Largest” Site for Sustainable Metal Powder Production

Continuum Powders, a supplier of metal powders made from recycled materials and used for additive manufacturing (AM), has announced the opening of its new global headquarters, in Houston, Texas. The...

John Kawola on BMF’s Formnext Highlights and What’s Next

Boston Micro Fabrication (BMF) has continued to grow steadily since my last visit to its Boston headquarters. The company, known for its ultra-precise 3D printing technology, showcased new product launches,...

Formnext 2024: Sustainability, Large-Format 3D Printers, & More

The doors have closed on Formnext 2024, but we still have more news to bring you about what was introduced on the show floor this year. WASP had several product...