Multi-Alloy and Multi-Process Additive Manufacturing for Rocket Engines – AMS Speaker Spotlight


Share this Article

In a harsh, unforgiving environment, abundant design decisions, complicated manufacturing, and component integration are necessary for hot-fire testing of liquid rocket engines. Knowing that things can go wrong in milliseconds, the engine’s rumble and the test’s thrill can sometimes leave you forgetting to breathe. Although complex and challenging, the design process for rocket engines is usually not where significant issues arise.

Manufacturing and assembling components into a complex system involves significant time, costs, and skills to meet integration and performance requirements. Yet, the promise of Additive Manufacturing (AM) for propulsion applications is being demonstrated across the aerospace industry for critical parts and enabling rocket designs not previously possible. Cutting-edge techniques like AM are used to reduce part count, optimize weight, and allow for more complex parts geometry. AM significantly reduces manufacturing component costs and lead times. AM also allows for a much faster design-fail-fix cycle to develop and test early prototypes before moving into production.

NASA has a vital role to help solve some of the manufacturing challenges while improving rocket engine performance. One example of high risk and high reward development is NASA’s Game Changing Development Rapid Analysis and Manufacturing Propulsion Technology (RAMPT) project.

RAMPT engaged industry, commercial space, and academia to advance and integrate several AM and advanced manufacturing processes and prove these through hot-fire testing. The liquid rocket engine combustion chamber and nozzle are often manufactured from a single alloy using one of the many metal additive manufacturing processes. RAMPT explored new research to create enabling new alloys, multi-alloy AM components, and combining several of the metal AM processes for further optimization of AM designs. This philosophy drove the team to merge novel AM designs with other advanced manufacturing composite overwrap techniques to further reduce weight (Figure 1).

Figure 1. RAMPT concept using multi-alloy AM, large scale LP-DED, and composite overwrap integrated into a rocket engine thrust chamber assembly (NASA).

Scale was one of the challenges the RAMPT team matured. NASA along with industry partners advanced the laser powder directed energy deposition (LP-DED) AM process to demonstrate complex thin-wall internal channel geometry at scales greater than 1-meter in diameter. This was targeting the channel-cooled nozzle. The freeform LP-DED process allows for large-scale additive manufacturing – not constrained by the build box.  In just 90 days the RAMPT project printed one of the largest AM nozzles NASA has produced by utilizing LP-DED, which included over 1,000 internal channels and measured 1.5 m (59 in) diameter and 1.8 m (72 in) tall (Figure 2). A full-scale RS-25 rocket engine nozzle liner was also developed under the RAMPT project with a 2.4 m (95 in) diameter and 2.8 m (111 in) height but did not include internal channels (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Large scale directed energy deposition nozzles. (Left) 1.5 m dia and 1.8 m height integral channel nozzle using NASA HR-1 alloy [NASA / RPMI]. (Right) 2.4 m dia and 2.8 m height liner using dual-head LP-DED with JBK-75 alloy (NASA / DM3D).

Various metal AM processes were explored to allow for multi-alloy components including powder bed fusion, directed energy deposition, and cold spray. Combustion chamber liners with integral coolant channels were built using the laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) process using the GRCop-42 (Cu-Cr-Nb) alloy. To properly integrate robust manifolds for fluid distribution, the LP-DED and cold spray processes were matured to deposit a high-strength, hydrogen-resistant superalloy called NASA HR-1. Transitional layers were built using AM nickel or copper-nickel alloys to provide robust bimetallic joints for the complex environment loads and material compatibility. To further advance the multi-alloy AM processes, the RAMPT project deposited integral internal channel LP-DED nozzles using the NASA HR-1 alloy directly onto the GRCop-42 L-PBF chambers, eliminating the need for bolted joints. Various sized rocket engine thrust chamber assemblies have been fabricated (Figure 3) to prove the development of the combined AM processes using the multi-alloys.

Figure 3. Various scales of composite overwrap multi-alloy and multi-process AM thrust chambers developed under the RAMPT project (NASA).

NASA has accumulated over 100,000 seconds of hot-fire testing on various AM parts and systems. This experience has helped NASA understand many of the challenges and limitations of AM and help establish standards for certification of AM components. To further advance the technology under the RAMPT project, 2,000 lbf (8.9 kN) and 7,000 lbf (31 kN) integrated thrust chambers were hot-fire tested at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) test stand 115 (Figure 4). Decouple (bolted) thrust chamber testing was also conducted at the 35,000 lbf (156 kN) to obtain data on the L-PBF GRCop-42 chamber and NASA HR-1 LP-DED integral channel nozzle (Figure 5). This testing proved out the challenges of the AM multi-alloys, combined AM processes, and composite overwrap and provided various lessons learned for industry infusion. Future testing will include a fully coupled 40,000 lbf (178 kN) at chamber pressures exceeding 1,400 psi (97 bar).

Figure 4. Hot-fire testing of a composite overwrap coupled GRCop-42 L-PBF chamber and LP-DED NASA HR-1 nozzle (NASA).

RAMPT utilized a multi-alloy, combined AM process approach along with complex composite applications and advanced AM simulation capabilities to develop large-scale, regeneratively-cooled liquid rocket engine technology. The RAMPT project reduced the design, analysis, fabrication, and assembly lifecycle lead times by over 50%. It also decreased part count by greater than 10x, reducing weight by more than 30% and increasing reliability. Additional RAMPT accomplishments included engaging the manufacturing community and facilitating the infusion of technology into the commercial industry through public-private partnerships to create a healthy supply chain. All data generated under the RAMPT project is available to industry partners.

Figure 5. Hot-fire testing of a 35,000 lbf AM bimetallic GRCop-42 L-PBF/Inconel 625 LP-DED combustion chamber and LP-DED nozzle with integral channels (NASA).

NASA is participating at Additive Manufacturing Strategies, taking place in New York City from February 7-9, 2023. Paul Gradl, Principal Engineer, Subject Matter Expert, at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) will be taking part in Session 3, Talk 2: Metal AM for Rocket Engines: Successes and Failures, on February 8. Register for your ticket to attend here

Share this Article

Recent News

3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: April 21, 2024

3D Printing News Briefs, April 20, 2024: Manufacturing 4.0 Consortium, Blow Molding, & More


3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns

You May Also Like

Nylon 3D Printed Parts Made More Functional with Coatings & Colors

Parts 3D printed from polyamide (PA, Nylon) 12 using powder bed fusion (PBF) are a mainstay in the additive manufacturing (AM) industry. While post-finishing processes have improved the porosity of...


Profiling a Construction 3D Printing Pioneer: US Army Corps of Engineers’ Megan Kreiger

The world of construction 3D printing is still so new that the true experts can probably be counted on two hands. Among them is Megan Kreiger, Portfolio Manager of Additive...

GREENFILL3D 3D Prints Sustainable Interior Solutions for Stretch Ceilings

Polish startup GREENFILL3D has previously produced sustainable in-store displays, plant markers, and lamps using sustainable materials and desktop 3D printers. I appreciate GREENFILL3D for its use of low-cost material extrusion...


Formlabs’ New Form 4 3D Printers Are 2-5X Faster than Form 3+

Formlabs has announced a new addition to its line of stereolithography (SLA) printers for additive manufacturing (AM): the Form 4 and Form 4B. Coming several years after the firm’s previous...