All-Electric Race Car Made Possible with Electron Beam Metal 3D Printing

Share this Article

Supported by Innovate UK, the Manufacturing Technology Centre (MTC) works to speed up industrial growth in the UK by creating and embedding future skills and developing and proving manufacturing processes, such as 3D printing. The latter is specifically what the National Centre for Additive Manufacturing (NCAM), part of the MTC, focuses on, and its DRAMA research project spent the last three years setting up a stronger AM supply chain for aerospace. But the NCAM also supports automotive and motorsports AM applications: a perfect example of this can be found in the recent work its Coventry team has done to help Oxford Brookes Racing (OBR), the Oxford Brookes University‘s formula student racing team, reach its 2020 all-electric goal.

OBR is one of the top UK formula student racing (FSUK) teams, and has worked with the MTC on a number of projects before. So the team knew that its NCAM would be the perfect partner to help them take things to the next level.

(Photo: Oxford Brookes Racing)

“After a long and successful history of combustion entries in the formula student competition, OBR is making the shift to electric for the 2020 season. With a new team structure and a class 2 project to serve as a R&D platform, OBR aims to develop a platform to not only take on the top FS teams in the world, but to also serve as a test bed of innovation for electric vehicles and controls software,” the OBR website states.

The goal was to see if additive manufacturing could be used to fabricate a complex part that connects the brake mounts, suspension link, and wheel, while also containing the car’s electric motor gearbox.

“Our team was aiming not only to develop a platform to take on the other top Formula Student teams in the world, but to also serve as a test bed for innovation in electric vehicles and controls software,” OBR’s Charles Boileve said. “It has also given us an opportunity to be on the forefront of not only performance, but also the industry by gaining both the knowledge and hands-on experience working with electric vehicles.”

OBR’s part produced in Ti64Al4V on an Arcam EBM Q20plus. (Photo: National Center Additive Manufacturing)

NCAM’s recently installed metal additive manufacturing facility is home to a variety of metal AM technologies, and the center is particularly good at helping clients determine the best technology for whatever application on which they happen to be working. In this case, it turned out to be the GE Additive Arcam Q20plus, an electron beam melting (EBM) system.

“The collaboration case study project enabled demonstration of the full AM end‑to-manufacturing process; from a conception idea to design for AM, manufacture, inspection and post processing machining,” stated Ruaridh Mitchinson, product development leader at NCAM. “The most exciting thing was working closely with MTC Design for Additive and process engineering experts to fully explore the EBM AM process capability, as well as disseminating the knowledge to Oxford Brookes racing team.”

Once it was decided that EBM would be the most appropriate technology, NCAM senior research engineer Emmanuel Muzangaza helped the OBR team develop and complete the critical part for its electric racecar.

“We’re here to help wherever we can. In fact, the OBR team already had a strong concept and design for additive in mind, which was about 90% there,” Mitchinson added. “Our team was able to add our deep additive expertise, offer guidance and add that remaining 10% in order to get the project up and running.”

OBR part with supports, prior-to support removal. (Photo: National Center Additive Manufacturing)

According to SmarTech Analysis, EBM technology had “huge growth levels for the first nine months” of 2019, the majority of which “was tied to GE Additive, the only significant commercial provider of the technology.”

“Electron beam melting for metals has been a relatively niche market for many years by comparison to laser technologies, and while laser systems will still command the majority share of industry revenues for the foreseeable future, it appears that the EBM segment is ripe for growth,” SmarTech continued.

(Image: SmarTech Analysis)

The OBR team chose EBM technology instead of other additive methods for several reasons, including increased design freedom that makes it possible to densely nest all of the larger parts without any swelling, and to create very few, or no, supports for less money. The process, which takes place at high temperatures in a vacuum, can rapidly print dimensionally accurate, stress-relieved parts using its high-powered electron beam, and results in components that feature material properties comparable to those of wrought material.

The high temperatures of EBM allow parts to be produced with minimal stress, and even none at all, and it’s also cost-effective, as it allows users to print with crack-prone, reactive materials, like the Ti6Al4V (titanium) alloy, for less money. Additionally, the Arcam Q20plus comes with a Powder Recovery Station (PRS), which means any extracted powder can possibly be reused for future prints.

OBR part with supports removed, prior to post-processing. (Photo: National Center Additive Manufacturing)

The part the team created was based on a 4WD in-hub motor configuration with AMK AC servo motors, which was paired to a compact epicyclic gearbox that could produce more than 300 N-m of torque per wheel. A 600V, 6.6 kW-hr battery pack with lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) pouch cells, featuring a peak output of over 130 kW, is used to supply energy to the component, and an open controls platform is used to manage it all, which, as a GE Additive press release states, is “ideal for implementing torque vectoring and advanced vehicle controls to unleash the full performance potential of an electric race car.”

As with all things in 2020, COVID-19 taketh away, and does not giveth anything, so the OBR20 team did not get to show off its new electric racecar on the track in the FSUK season. But, over 80 teams did participate in a virtual competition a few months ago, and OBR20 placed third in Virtual Dynamics and fifth in Statics. If these two had been scored together, like they would have been at the real event, OBR20 would have placed second a third year running.

OBR’s complex part. (Photo: Oxford Brookes Racing)

“While we hit a bump in the road this year, we continued to better ourselves as engineers – by pushing ahead and looking forward,” Boileve said. “The electric revolution is still coming, so we will be striving for perfection as a team, and remain committed to our vision of building a multi-year legacy.”

Share this Article


Recent News

3D Printing: the Future of Sticks

Intelligent and Automated Post-Processing for Resin 3D Printing Launched by Nexa3D



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

3D Printing Webinar and Virtual Event Roundup, September 27, 2020

A range of topics will be covered in this week’s roundup of webinars and virtual events, starting with controlled nesting and increased productivity. Moving on, attendees can learn how to...

Featured

What Does the Siemens-Nexa3D Partnership Mean for 3D Printing?

3D printer manufacturer Nexa3D has announced a collaboration with technology company Siemens to automate its polymer laser sintering systems. Even during COVID-19, the two companies have remained committed to Industry...

3D Printing News Briefs, August 11, 2020: 3DEO, Nexa3D, AK Medical

In today’s 3D Printing News Briefs, 3DEO has won a design competition, and Nexa3D will be demonstrating its expanded line of ultra-fast polymers at this week’s AM Industry Summit. Finally,...

3D Printing Webinar and Virtual Event Roundup, August 9, 2020

We’ve only got four online events to tell you about this week—a summit and a few webinars, one of which is on-demand. Read on to learn more! AM Industry Virtual...


Shop

View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.