Juuso Uusimaki has submitted a thesis to the Master’s Degree Programme in Photonics at the University of Eastern Finland. In ‘3D Printing of plastic optical components & comparison to traditional manufacturing methods’, the author explores the potential for optical components in industrial applications, as well as the benefits of 3D printing such parts.
Because optics are usually made from a variety of different types of glass, there are challenges in dealing with cost and the limited amount of structures that can be created aside from spheres—leading some manufacturers to use carbon-based plastic polymers as an alternative—even more possible today after extensive research has resulted in more efficient manufacturing that wins out over traditional methods.
“Lenses are used to focus light in a certain manner, either to converge or diverge the incident wavefront, essentially altering its propagation direction or wavefront curvature,” states Uusimaki. “Lenses often have at least two refractive surfaces, of which usually one or both are curved in a spherical or aspherical (near-spherical) manner, though the surfaces can even be freeform, meaning any geometrical shape that refracts light in a desired way.”
Lenses can also be used to increase or decrease image size by way of magnification—or the opposite—and optical systems are created by setting up numerous lenses, often seen in devices like cameras, microscopes, and telescopes.
Noting that conventional processes like FDM 3D printing are ‘not really suitable’ for the fabrication of optical components, Uusimaki explains that there are solutions via SLA printing.
“Conventional SLA methods, in general, are relatively cheap and easy for quick prototyping, but the printed objects tend to require post-processing techniques, such as polishing and coating, before they are ready for optical usage,” states Uusimaki. “This is because while printing a curved surface layer by layer, visible edges can appear in the object, and impurities in the material as well as machine inaccuracies may create imperfections in the product.”
Uusimaki contends that techniques like continuous liquid interface production (CLIP) could possibly be the answer for attaining ‘high-optical clarity and nanometer-scale surface resolution,’ along with methods like multiphoton stereolithography (MPS). Here, the author focused on AM of Senop Oy’s aspheric lenses 3D printed with Printoptical® technology.
Numerous samples of two different lenses were fabricated using a variety of process parameters, ultimately resulting in four lenses ‘deemed acceptable.’
“The measurements taken with a tilted-wave interferometer have shown that the technology can already produce micrometer-scale surface accuracies across the whole area of the component without any post-processing or iterative cycles, suggesting that printing centimeter-scale lenses might become a notable option for the early-stage prototyping needs of optical manufacturers in the near future,” concluded the researcher.
“Moreover, having introduced the basic theories governing modern optics, such as the propagation of light and the dispersive qualities of common optical components, a general investigation of transparent polymer materials has shown both their forthand shortcomings when compared to optical glass materials: even though plastic components can generally not rival their glass counterparts when considering stability or optical qualities, they have a competitive edge in certain situations due to their low weights and costs, efficient mass-production capabilities as well as broader optomechanical possibilities.”
3D printing plays a role in many different types of optics today, as researchers examine new materials like flexible thermoplastic polymers, metamaterials with embedded features, and offer other improvements on both the micro- and nanoscale.
What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.[Source / Images: ‘3D Printing of plastic optical components & comparison to traditional manufacturing methods’]
You May Also Like
3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: July 25th, 2021
From compact SLS 3D printing and SOLIDWORKS certifications to full-color 3D printing, 3D printing for cosmetic dentistry, photopolymers, and more, we’ve got a lot of topics covered in this week’s...
Trump the Mundane Performance in Smart Printing — Creality CR-10 Smart Vanquishes with Advanced Functions
In an era that 3D printing functions seems to sit in a stereotyped mundane track, how to renovate turns to be of much importance that often draws the attention of...
3D Printing vs. CNC Machining
What’s the Best Way to Make Your Part? CNC machining is a common subtractive manufacturing technology. Unlike 3D printing, the process typically begins with a solid block of material (blank)...
3D Printing News Briefs, July 17, 2021: SME, Z3DLAB & CNRS, GKN Additive, FibreTuff & RSNA, Nano Dimension & Hensoldt, ioTech
In today’s 3D Printing News Briefs, we’ll tell you about a rebranded case study award, and then a few stories about 3D printing materials. Finishing up, we’re sharing news about...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.