AM Energy

Optimization of Parameters & Properties with FDM 3D Printed 17-4PH Stainless Steel

HP March 26th Webinar

Share this Article

International researchers have teamed up to improve the results of fused filament fabrication (FFF), releasing their findings in the recently published ‘Optimization of the 3D Printing Parameters for Tensile Properties of Specimens Produced by Fused Filament Fabrication of 17-4PH Stainless Steel.’

During this study, the authors experimented for the best outcome in optimized FFF 3D printing—a method originally created for polymeric materials; however, blends are now available for metal fabrication and the hardware has become much more accessible and affordable. For many applications, achieving suitable mechanical properties is impossible without the use of multicomponent polymeric binder systems.

The researchers used a proprietary binder system and 17-4PH stainless-steel powder for shaping samples based on optimized design. Samples were created on an Original Prusa i3 MK3 FFF 3D printer, using a nozzle with a diameter of 0.4mm.

Dog-bone specimen printed during printing trials (all dimensions are in mm).

“Central composite design is a design of first order (2k—where k is a number of adjustable parameters) extended with additional trials in the center of the design (mean values of parameters) and axis for each parameter, in order to be able to estimate parameters with models of second order,” stated the researchers. “Central composite design consists of 2k trials on the peak values of the observed parameters, 2k trials in axes of each parameter, and trials at the center of the design.”

Model of central composite design with three factors

The team continued, performing both tensile testing and scanning electron microscopy.

Static material testing machine Shimadzu AGS-X 10 kN with tested specimen.

Scanning electron microscope Tescan Vega TS 5136 MM.

“In order to set the FFF parameters for the production of specimens with optimal properties, the criteria for optimization have to be determined,” stated the researchers. “Here, complex optimization based on multiple simultaneous criteria was used.”

In varying printing parameters, the researchers noted that the appearances of the samples changed.

Top and side views of specimens printed at different conditions of the design of experiment (DoE) after tensile testing: (a) trial 7 (temperature 210 °C); (b) trial 5 (temperature 260 °C); (c) trial 10 (flow rate multiplier 95%); (d) trial 13 (flow rate multiplier 127%); (e) trial 2 (layer thickness. 0.12 mm); (f) trial 6 (layer thickness. 0.28 mm).

Morphology of three-dimensional (3D) printed parts investigated by scanning electron microscopy at different magnifications: (a) 39×; (b) 300×; (c) 2300×; (d) 2400×.

“A lower extrusion temperature interfered with material deposition, resulting in more air gaps and reduced minimal cross-section of the specimens and, therefore, lower tensile properties,” concluded the research team. “Extrusion at lower temperatures also negatively affected the bond between two different layers, which led to lower tensile properties. In this research, only the polymer components (45% vol.) were melted during FFF process; therefore, the effect of extrusion temperature on tensile properties was not as strong as in the case of FFF of pure polymer materials.

“The results of this analysis can be used in future research for comparison with properties of final parts obtained after green parts undergo debinding and sintering. This comparison will show if the same trend between tensile properties obtained after FFF and after sintering are present, and if the level of the effect of tensile properties obtained after the FFF process holds after the specimens are sintered.”

As 3D printing continues to impact nearly every industry today, researchers conduct a wide range of research with stainless steel, to include creating better grades of material, testing the effects of various gases, and testing different hardware.

What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

[Source / Images: ‘Optimization of the 3D Printing Parameters for Tensile Properties of Specimens Produced by Fused Filament Fabrication of 17-4PH Stainless Steel’]

Share this Article


Recent News

AddUp Announces Deputy CEO & Innovations in Medical & Injection Molding AM

3D Printing News Unpeeled: Solenoids, Hydrogel Buildings and Missiles



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

3D Printing News Briefs, February 17, 2024: Shot Blasting, Service Bureaus, & More

In today’s 3D Printing News Briefs, we’re starting out with post-processing, as SKZ Würzburg is using a shot blast system from AM Solutions for its research. Moving on to business,...

MIT Researchers Use AI to Optimize Stiffness and Toughness Balance in 3D Printed Parts

In January, researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s (MIT’s) Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) published a study in the journal Science Advances, which details an algorithm they...

Northrop Grumman Taps GKN Aerospace for 3D Printed Solid Rocket Motors

At the beginning of January, UK aerospace manufacturer GKN Aerospace announced it was investing over $60 million to boost its additive manufacturing (AM) capacity in Trollhättan, Sweden. Now, GKN is...

3D Printing News Unpeeled: 3D Printed Golf Clubs, an India Made SLS Printer, MIT Liquid Metal and a Vietnamese Trauma Implant

After Cobra’s King putters, the firm now has a line of 8 clubs that use MJF binder jet. The Agera and others have different sized insets and cost $349. The...