In the recently published ‘Determining the tribological properties of different 3D printing filaments,’ Romanian researchers examine 3D printing filaments in-depth, with a focus on pinpointing suitable materials for fabricating parts that come into contact with one another. In this research, they study friction coefficients as materials are in contact with a metallic disc.
While ‘vast research’ has been performed in the area of friction coefficients and wear of 3D printing materials, here the researchers center their study around Zortrax filaments, analyzing eight polymers, with each printed on a Zortrax M200 Desktop 3D Printer. Ultimately, the team will choose a material for fabrication of a new shoe sole.
“Mass printing custom fit 3D soles is considered one of the future directions in athletic shoe manufacturing and Adidas in collaboration with Carbon have already started research and production in this area,” explain the researchers.
The following filaments were used:
- Z-ABS – optimal for beginners
- Z-GLASS – a translucent material
- Z-HIPS – meant for larger parts
- Z-PCABS – offers strength and durability
- Z-PETG – resistant to acids, solvents, alkalis, and salt
- Z-ESD – provides electrostatic protection
- Z-PLA PRO – reduces shrinkage to obtain fine details
- Z-ASA PRO – resistant to UV, humidity, heat, and is good for the outdoors
(Note from the researchers: the Z-ULTRAT sample filament broke before printing was completed, so this material was excluded from the study.)
The pin-on-disc method was used in testing, as the researchers placed three pins in sockets on a disc, located 100mm from the center. This was rotated at 350rpm, and the disc was cleaned after each test due to continued residue.
“The first load was the disc itself that accounted for a loading force of 10.17 N. After that, a first weight was added, and the total load force was 11.72 N. The second weight was added after that to increase the load force to 14.91 N, then the third to increase the load force to 17.13 N, and finally the fourth for a total load force of 18.55 N,” explained the researchers.
The same testing mechanism was used in analyzing wear behavior, as the metal disc rotated with the pins on it—at maximum force load of 18.55 N for 5 minutes, then 10 minutes, 15 minutes, and 20 minutes.
Sample 9 (Z-ASA PRO) proved to offer the highest wear percentage, while sample 7 (Z-ESD) demonstrated the lowest wear percentage. Sample 3 (Z-HIPS) offered the highest friction coefficient, ‘followed closely’ by sample 9 (Z-ASA PRO). Sample 5 (Z-PETG) demonstrated the lowest friction coefficient.
“In conclusion, if the interest is to develop soles with low wear behavior and high friction, one recommendation is to use the Z-GLASS material, if the mechanical behavior corresponds with the product requirements. If one needs a balance between friction and wear (like in the day-to-day shoes), then materials corresponding to the sample 1 (Z-ABS) and 8 (Z-PLA PRO) are recommended.
“For soles requiring low friction (for example sportive dancing) material nr 5 (Z-PETG) is recommended. If the wear is not considered a pressing issue, for good friction, material number 3 (Z-HIPS) is recommended,” concluded the researchers.
This study brings together two areas that are receiving substantial attention right now in the study of materials and their properties, as well as 3D printing and additive manufacturing processes in the production of shoes as companies like Adidas have announced a 4D running shoe, Nike has produced footwear with a 3D printed upper sole, and New Balance is getting in on the 3D printed footwear market too.
What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.[Source / Images: ‘Determining the tribological properties of different 3D printing filaments’]
You May Also Like
3D Printing Foam Concrete: Investigating Production Techniques
In the recently published ‘Investigations on the foam concrete production techniques suitable for 3D printing with foam concrete,’ authors V. Markin, G. Sahmenko, V.N. Nerella, M. Nather, and V. Mechtcherine...
TU Dresden: CONPrint3D for Monolithic 3D Printing in Construction
Researchers from the Technische Universität Dresden have been exploring challenges within the construction industry. In their recently published paper, ‘Large-scale digital concrete construction – CONPrint3D concept for on-site, monolithic 3D...
Truth in 3D Printed Construction? “Nobody 3D Printed an Entire Building”
At 3DPrint.com, we’ve always been very skeptical about the goings-on in 3D printed construction. A lot of houses have been 3D printed in 24 hours, each time while conveniently forgetting...
Researchers Assess the Use of 3D Printing Geo-Polymer Concrete
In the recently published ‘Life Cycle Assessment of 3D Printing Geo-polymer Concrete: An Ex-ante Study,’ authors Yue Yao, Mingming Hu, Francesco Di Maio, and Stefano Cucurachi examine the development of...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.