In the recently published ‘Visual Detection of Surface Defects Based on Self-Feature Comparison in Robot 3-D Printing,’ Chinese researchers from the College of Mechanical Engineering at Zhejiang University (both the State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems and the Key Laboratory of 3D Printing Process and Equipment of Zhejiang Province) delve into the challenges of robot 3D printing, how to pinpoint defects more clearly, and ways to overcome them.
Defects, ranging from surface quality issues to problems that cause complete collapse may occur in a variety of cases, but the researchers add that it is critical to avoid false detection rates and to be able to distinguish defects versus characteristics of parts. With early detection, users can correct issues quickly—reducing the amount of material (and time and effort) wasted.
“Defect detection is a hot research field. The existing defect detection methods can be divided into two groups: machine vision-based monitoring systems and laser scanning-based monitoring systems,” stated the researchers. “The former mainly uses cameras to take pictures, while the latter can measure the height of the object, which cannot be achieved by a monocular vision-based system.”
Both traditional techniques and deep learning methods rely on defect detection algorithms—with researchers developing either as they apply to their specific fields. For most works that have already been produced, scientists focus on finding defects that are in the upper part of parts made via FDM 3D printing. Defects often appear when layers are ‘irregular,’ as well, giving merit to outer surface detection.
For this study, the research team developed a way to separate defects from characteristics—via comparing theoretical projection contours and the experimental contours of products. The main software used was Visual Studio 2015, and the robot 3D printer was based on the Japanese Mitsubishi RV-6SD 6-DOF robot, accompanied by the German Basler acA1600-20gm camera and computer.
The algorithm for detecting defects consists of:
- 3D printing processing steps
- Contour detection
- Identifying defects and own characteristics
The image processing technology captures details from the projected picture and the captured picture—while defects, as well as characteristics, are noted as parameters of the contours in the picture are compared with the model.
“When the similarity of parameters between the former contour and one of the latter contours reaches a threshold, it means the contour is its own feature, not the defect, and vice versa,” explain the researchers.
The self-feature extraction method allows visual points to be highlighted via coordinates and direction of the camera, with feature points projected onto theoretical pictures, resulting in self-feature pictures.
“Note that in theory, the minimum size of defects the method can detect is 8.5 pixels by 8.5 pixels and as for the real physical size, it needs to be converted by the camera parameters and detection distance,” concluded the researchers.
“In future work, the processing time of the proposed algorithm should be further shortened so that it could satisfy the need for real-time online detection. And to improve the robustness of the detection system, materials of printing objects, experimental environments, and equipment should be taken into consideration.”
What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.[Source / Images: ‘Visual Detection of Surface Defects Based on Self-Feature Comparison in Robot 3-D Printing’]
You May Also Like
Graphene 3D Printing Enables Water Treatment Applications
Aerogels, formed by replacing the liquid in a gel material with a gas so the solid remains the same size, are extremely porous, lightweight yet strong solids, not dissimilar in...
3D Printed Artificial Leaves Could Generate Oxygen on Mars
Researchers at the Delft University of Technology (TU Delft) have developed a method for bioprinting algae to create living, photosynthetic materials that are tough and resilient. The resulting study, published...
3D Printing News Briefs, May 2, 2021: Intech; 3DPrinterOS & Octoprint; BEAMIT; ITB, ITK, & University of Manchester; Makerbot; Satori & Oxford University
We’re going to take care of business first in today’s 3D Printing News Briefs, and then move on to some research and education. Intech Additive Solutions is reporting multiple orders...
TU Wien & Cubicure Develop Ivory Substitute for 3D Printing Restoration Pieces
Ivory, a hard, white material consisting mainly of dentine, makes up the tusks of several large animals, such as walruses, narwhals, and elephants. For a long time, the material was...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.