Israeli researchers Lihi Shenhav and Dov Sherman delve into testing 3D printed cell structures, outlining their findings in the recently published ‘Fracture of 3D printed brittle open-cell structures under compression.’
Helpful in many applications due to volume, surface area, and weight, cellular materials are used in critical parts like fuel cells, catalysts, heat exchanges, and more; however, as tissue engineering continues to progress, they are also used in bio-inspired structures.
‘Anticrack’ is a term coined regarding crack propagation—like both biological and earth crust phenomena. While full bulk materials may exhibit crack propagation from tensile stress, porous material cracks may occur during compression causing issues like bone fractures, building collapses, avalanches, and more. There has been very little research performed regarding crack propagation under compression, however, leaving the authors motivated to study more about porous materials and why they break under duress.
The researchers tested samples for the study consisting of brittle cubic and tetragonal structures, with the tops and bottoms comprised of two 3D printed layers, meant to bolster the surfaces and prevent collapse.
“Cellular specimens are characterized by low stiffness and applied loads. The compliance of the loading machine was evaluated by using an infinitely stiff specimen compared to that of the measured specimen. In our case, a steel specimen with the dimensions of the bulk specimen was chosen,” stated the researchers.
“The experiments were carried out under displacement controlled in compression, with_u= 0.1 mm/min. The material response was recorded in terms of load vs. displacement.”
The researchers 3D printed their samples with the 3D Systems ProJet500 HD 3D printer. During experimentation, load was applied for compression using two parallel aluminum plates meant to cause uniform deformation of the samples, testing the following:
- Notched specimens
- Edge-notched specimens
- Central notched specimens
“The effective and homogenized critical stresses under compression, or, alternately, the effective homogenized compressive strength, σc eff, obtained by the critical load over the entire area of the specimen, was found to be 1.45 ± 0.13 and 0.99 ± 0.11 MPa for the cubic and tetragonal-cell structures, respectively,” stated the research team. “The effective elastic modulus, E′, evaluated by the linear relationship between the homogenized stress and strain were 212.1 ±27.3 MPa and 193.9 ± 37.4 MPa, respectively, for the cubic and tetragonal cell structures.
Ultimately, the ‘well-ordered design structure’ exhibited low distribution of both measured and calculated properties, with the connection between critical stress to failure of specimens and critical stress allowing for the calculation of critic parameters. The study also further showed that when local buckling occurs, it is due to compressive stress—as seen in the buckled shape of the column in pre-designed columns.
“Most importantly, we conclude that the fracture energy, ~GIC, of the brittle cellular materials under compression is unequivocally not a material property but depends upon the geometry of both the columns and the specimens. The material properties of the cellular notched structures are dictated by the elastic modulus of the basic material through the Euler buckling theory. The fracture energy of the rectangular open-cell structures can be evaluated quite accurately using very few experiments. There is, practically, no need to evaluate the near-tip strain energy using DIC when accurate-enough results can be achieved by a simpler method such as FEA J-integral along the far-right free surface. Finally, the conclusions of this research are applicable to practical problems in several disciplines and at multiple-length scales: geophysics (earthquakes in the deep crust), engineering (cutting-edge light-weight materials), natural hazards (snow avalanches), and, in medicine (human bones), all of great interest to the fracture community and the associated fields,” concluded the researchers.
“Finally, the conclusions of this research are applicable to practical problems in several disciplines and at multiple-length scales: geophysics (earthquakes in the deep crust), engineering (cutting-edge light-weight materials), natural hazards (snow avalanches), and, in medicine (human bones), all of great interest to the fracture community and the associated field.”
Researchers continue a wide range of experiments in labs around the world, testing strength, compression, and how to improve material and mechanical properties for better 3D printing. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.[Source / Implants: ‘Fracture of 3D printed brittle open-cell structures under compression’]
You May Also Like
3DPrint.com Review of the Creality CR-6 SE
I received a pre-production version of the Creality CR-6 SE 3D printer for review a few weeks ago. I’m pleasantly surprised with this solid printer which is currently on Kickstarter...
Creality CR-6 SE 3D Printer Debuts on Kickstarter with over 1,000 Backers in One Hour
On May 6th, Chinese 3D printer brand Creality made its first crowdfunding project debut on Kickstarter with its latest 3D printer, the CR-6 SE, featuring an innovative leveling-free tech to...
The Creality CR-6 Leveling-Free Tech 3D Printer is Live on Kickstarter
Creality CR-6 SE Leveling-free Tech 3D Printer is live on Kickstarter, The campaign will run from May 6th to June 6th. Super early bird backers can secure their own super...
3D Printing News Briefs: April 23, 2020
We’re talking about 3D printing in education, partnerships, and RC planes in today’s 3D Printing News Briefs. First, Y Soft has announced premium lesson plans and an EDU bundle, while...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.