Using Semi-Supervised Machine Learning in Laser Powder-bed Fusion Fault Detection
Researchers from the University of Liverpool outline their findings regarding the automatic detection of faults in additive manufacturing products in a recently published paper, ‘Automatic fault detection for laser powder-bed fusion using semi-supervised machine learning.’ Their work continues an ongoing trend in perfecting 3D printing and additive manufacturing techniques to enhance numerous industries currently delving into the technology.
The scientists have created a machine learning algorithm, using a semi-supervised approach, to detect AM product flaws. The algorithm draws data from parts that are already certified as well as those with unknown quality. While this not only furthers the quality of 3D printing, the approach is much more efficient and affordable—in relation to laser powder-bed fusion printing.
The researchers compiled data using ‘high precision photodiodes,’ a type of very sensitive sensor able to process measurements to assess quality.
“Understanding the correlations between this data and build quality is a challenging area,” state the researchers. “However, advances in machine learning have made it possible to create and apply intelligent algorithms to large datasets for decision making.”
“Such algorithms can identify patterns in large data, after being trained. The current work is based on the hypothesis that, using large amounts of process measurements from L-PBF machines, machine learning can be used to quickly and cheaply classify the success of L-PBF builds.”
The semi-supervised approach is exactly what it sounds like—a mode in between completely supervised with labeled data and defined sets and unsupervised learning where patterns much be discovered with unlabeled data.
“With a semi-supervised approach, the user provides some labeled data and some unlabeled data at the same time,” state the researchers. “The model may then attempt to establish a decision boundary and classifies the data into clusters; based on the characteristics of the provided labeled and unlabeled information.”
The researchers point out that a semi-supervised approach works well in a scenario rich in unlabeled data, with only a few labeled data—saving time and money in the number of experiments performed.
This is a data-based project, based only on patterns from the photodiode measurements, helping the researchers identify the causes of 3D printing defects. Often, they are the result of poor settings, inferior supports, issues with powder, or temperature or material problems. The four following parameters have the most effect on part quality:
- Part bed temperature
- Laser power
- Scan speed
- Scan spacing
For this study, two L-PBF builds were used, and the researchers built 50 tensile test bars, with 25 yielded in each build. Data was gleaned from each build, as ‘the x and y position of the laser was collected alongside time history measurements from 2 photodiodes sensors (sample frequency equal to 100 kHz, resulting in approximately 400 GB of data per build).’
Tensile tests were performed by the research time, and each bar was judged as either acceptable or faulty, with a 77 percent test rate.
“The results show that semi-supervised learning is a promising approach for the automatic certification of AM builds that can be implemented at a fraction of the cost currently required,” concluded the researchers.
“Future work aims to investigate whether classification can be improved through the use of additional, complimentary sensing systems (acoustic sensors and thermal imaging cameras, for example).”
With the inception of 3D printing came the continual marveling of all we can create—but also continual suspicion regarding whether the parts can hold up for functional use, some of it which is meant to be highly industrial. Testing of parts has become an extensive field on its own, whether in improving CT scanning procedures, testing 3D printed motors for the military, or even using robotics for such purposes. Find out more about testing of parts in relation to laser powder-bed fusion here. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.[Source / Images: Automatic fault detection for laser powder-bed fusion using semi-supervised machine learning]
You May Also Like
The Do’s and Don’ts of Additive Manufacturing
The best-use cases for 3D printing aren’t always obvious. When designing an object for additive manufacturing, it’s important to keep the limits and benefits of the process in mind. These...
5 Professional Finishing Options for FDM Parts
Despite the advances of other technologies, Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) remains the go-to 3D printing process for prototypes and simple plastic parts. It’s fast, it’s cheap, and there are thousands...
The Advantages of 3D Printing
In recent years, 3D printers have taken the manufacturing industry by storm. From automobiles to computer parts, products made by 3D printers have undoubtedly played a big role in the...
3D Printing Being Combined with Soldering to Create High-Performance Zeolites
Researchers in China are exploring the use of minerals called zeolites, hoping to harness ‘desirable configurations’ via 3D printing and soldering, which is further outlined in ‘Fabricating Mechanically Robust Binder-Free...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.