3D printing is starting to break into the mainstream, and in 2018, the global additive manufacturing market was estimated to have generated revenues of $9.3 billion. By 2020, it could grow to nearly $14 billion. 3D printing is gaining popularity due to its ability to enable rapid prototyping, reduce production costs, increase supply chain efficiency and manufacture unique items. It also has the potential to be a more sustainable method of manufacturing.
Reduced Shipping Needs
With mass manufacturing, materials, parts and final products are often shipped long distances, creating significant levels of carbon emissions. With 3D printing, however, you can manufacture goods closer to the end user. Retailers can produce items in stores, manufacturers can make replacement parts for machinery on-site and consumers can even print items directly in their homes. This dramatically reduces the distances goods must be shipped.
Another major benefit of 3D printing is its ability to help companies reduce their waste. In CNC manufacturing, up to 70 percent of the materials used to fabricate parts can end up as scraps. With additive manufacturing, rather than cut away parts of a larger piece of material, you create the product by laying down material layer by layer. This means there’s no scrap and no waste. Reducing the amount of resources used has a positive environmental impact and also helps reduce costs.
Sustainable Material Options
Manufacturers that use 3D printers can choose among various sustainable, recyclable and environmentally friendly solutions, particularly with the evolving. While plastic is a common material for 3D printing, some researchers are developing printing methods using natural materials, primarily water- based or cellulose-chitin material.
Two of the most common materials used for printing plastic items are ABS and PLA. These materials become soft and malleable when they’re heated, meaning you can reuse material from old products to create new ones using a 3D printer. Regrinding ABS and reusing that as a 3D printing material is already being done. ABS is not nearly as environmentally friendly as PLA being a petroleum-based material. It can be reused multiple times, however. PLA is made from plants, most often corn. PLA is not perfect, seven liters of water are needed to make the material and corn is a food source. A PLA made from agricultural waste would be far superior. In other materials such as PET 3D printing materials have been successfully made from post-consumer recycled plastic bottles (mixed with around 10% new PET). Researchers are also looking into ways to use other natural substances as 3D printing material, such as algae, coffee grounds and cellulose, which is a structural component of plants’ primary cell walls.
Reduced Energy Use
Although exactly how 3D printing adoption on a large scale would impact energy use is still uncertain, some studies suggest that it may reduce energy consumption over the lifecycle of a product. In one study, researchers from Michigan Technological University analyzed the energy required to print objects with a 3D printer compared to what was needed to manufacture them in a factory overseas and ship them to the U.S. The researchers found that printing the items took between 41 and 64 percent less energy. Part of this reduction was because 3D printing doesn’t require as much material, and part of it was due to the reduced need for shipping.
Not only that, but additive manufacturing also offer the opportunity to produce renewable energy sources. Sandia recently 3D printed solar cells that receive solar power up to 20 percent more effectively than current technology using high-termperature nickel alloy Iconel and a powder bed fusion. Sandia is only one example of applications for additive manufacturing in the energy industry.
There are also some environmental challenges associated with 3D printing. Using a 3D printer results in the emission of nanosized particles that could be harmful. The emission rate is similar to activities such as cooking on a stove, burning scented candles or smoking a cigarette indoors, one study noted. It’s advised only to use a 3D printer if you have proper ventilation.
The environmental impact of 3D printing an object is also significantly influenced by the type of material used. If you use plastics that are environmentally harmful, the impact will be much higher than if you use a sustainably produced material. Fixing this issue will require a broader change in the materials used in manufacturing.
The additive manufacturing sector is still young, but it has a lot of potential to help manufacturing become more sustainable. Companies and consumers must make a conscious effort to make sustainability a priority in matters related to 3D printing.
Emily is an environmental and manufacturing writer. You can read more of her work on her blog, Conservation Folks.
You May Also Like
U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory: 3D Printing Customized Ear Plugs for Soldiers
Researchers JR Stefanson and William Ahroon recently completed a study for the U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, releasing their findings in ‘Evaluation of Custom Hearing Protection Fabricated from Digital Ear...
On-Demand Surgical Retractor 3D Printed by the U.S. Air Force
The U.S. Department of Defense is using even more of its mind-boggling budget on additive manufacturing (AM) for virtual inventory and on-demand spare parts. This time, the world’s most dangerous...
West Point: Bioprinting for Soldiers in the Battlefield
Last summer, U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel Jason Barnhill traveled to an undisclosed desert location in Africa with a ruggedized 3D printer and other basic supplies that could be used to...
Australian Army Enters 3D Printing Pilot Program, Partnering with SPEE3D & CDU
3D printing will soon be assisting members of the military in Australia, as a 12-month pilot training program has begun in a $1.5 million partnership with SPEE3D and Charles Darwin...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.