The quality of what your 3D printer is producing should obviously be measured by more than layer height, but it is easy to focus on that one aspect. With so much competition in the 3D printing marketplace, we should remember to delve deeper in exploring what type of print quality we are receiving. Recently, test model files were released from MAKE 3D Shoot Out 2015 so you can do just that.
Andreas Bastian from the MAKE 3D Shoot Out 2015 testing team focused on looking at print quality under more of a microscope, to gain real quantitative data, with his new set of Fusion 360 designed test models. With the release of these files on Thingiverse, anyone can use the test models, and can share their information. That should lead to some very interesting conversations in the 3D printing community.
- Dimensional accuracy
- Surface finish
- Overhang capabilities
- Deposition control
- Motion mechanics
- Motion control
- Material properties
- Slicing algorithms
What makes measuring these factors more complex though is that what you modify or change in one of the aforementioned aspects or qualities can relate to the others, as they are often entwined in the printed processes. What was necessary was for each of those ‘geometries’ to be measured individually in terms of quality, and Bastian provides that level of in-depth evaluation with a ‘more parametric and quantitative assessment of print quality than could be achieved by comparing any number of more traditional printed models.’
Bastian recommends that for looking at performance of the printer, software, and materials you should print the models using either default or medium settings, which should be a layer height of 0.2 mm, and default speeds and temperatures. It’s very important to note also that if you are measuring quality data from multiple machines, use the same printing materials for each one for consistency. Click here for a detailed, technical list of what you should be looking for in each item being evaluated.
You are invited to make an “I Made One” button, and your results are welcome for sharing, provided you include:
- Photo(s) of your completed test prints
- Machine make and model
- Slicer and slicing settings (layer height, number of shells, print temperature, extrusion multipliers, speeds)
- Print time
- Filament source
All 26 machine reviews were published in Make’s Annual Guide to 3D Printing 2015 (Volume 42). Will you be producing an “I made one” button? Please let us know, as well as sharing your thoughts regarding the 3D printed models used for measuring 3D printer quality in the 3D Printer Quality Testing forum at 3DPB.com.
A few more previews of the print accuracy tests:
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Stay up-to-date on all the latest news from the 3D printing industry and recieve information and offers from thrid party vendors.
You May Also Like
GM’s New Cadillac CELESTIQ to Feature Over 100 3D Printed Parts
The Cadillac CELESTIQ is the wildest car name ever—like the name of a futuristic rocket vehicle from Spy Kids. It’s like a name for a space ship or a fever...
Seurat Plans to Multiply Metal 3D Printing Workforce Tenfold by 2025
Seurat, a metal additive manufacturing (AM) technology and services startup, has announced an ambitious plan to increase its number of employees from 100 to 1,000 by 2025. In a press...
Innovation for Electric Vehicles Polymer 3D Printing – An HP and 3DPrint.com Webinar
As additive manufacturing (AM) has matured, the technology is now primed for widespread adoption in the automotive sector. Already multiple vehicle manufacturers, including Volkswagen and Ford, have announced plans to...
The Benefit of 3D Printing for Engines in Motorsports
Probably most associated with Formula 1, auto racing is the fastest and one of the most technologically advanced sports in the world. Production technology for motorsports, in particular, is at...